Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Safety and Effectiveness of Intravenous Pentamidine for Prophylaxis of Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia in Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Patients Loriel.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Safety and Effectiveness of Intravenous Pentamidine for Prophylaxis of Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia in Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Patients Loriel."— Presentation transcript:

1 Safety and Effectiveness of Intravenous Pentamidine for Prophylaxis of Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia in Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Patients Loriel Solodokin, PharmD. Assistant Professor of Pharmacy Practice, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences University Clinical Oncology Pharmacist, Dana Farber Cancer Institute/Massachusetts General Hospital BIT 3rd Annual World Congress of Pediatrics November 2, 2017

2 Conflicts of Interest None of the study investigators have anything to disclose concerning possible conflicts of interest related to this presentation

3 Background Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP)
Opportunistic infection Breakthrough infection rate sans prophylaxis 22%-45% in HIV negative children with hematological malignancies Advent of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) Significantly ↓ PCP incidence in pediatric hematology/oncology patients Mortality rates Lower in non-HIV/AIDS patients vs. those with HIV/AIDS Children: (non-HIV+, with ALL) Crozier F. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs Pyrgos V, et al. Paediatr Respir Rev Hughes WT, et al. N Engl J Med

4 PCP Risk Factors In HIV negative children
High-dose, prolonged steroid therapy Chemotherapy-induced immunosuppression Solid organ/bone marrow transplant (BMT) Primary immune deficiency Malignancy diagnosis Crozier F. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs Pyrgos V, et al. Paediatr Respir Rev

5 PCP Prophylaxis: Guideline Recommendations
Line of Therapy Drug Dosing First-line (Gold Standard) Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) Children: 5 mg/kg/day divided BID x 2-3 consecutive days/week Adolescents/adults: 1 DS tab daily x 2-3 consecutive days/week (max: 320 mg TMP/day) Second-line Pentamidine IV: ≥ 2 yrs: 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks Inh: ≥ 5 yrs: 8 mg/kg, via Respirgard II nebulizer, every 4 weeks (max: 300 mg/dose) Atovaquone 1-3 mo or > 24 mo: 30 mg/kg/dose 4-24 mo: 45 mg/kg/dose ≥ 13 yo: 1500 mg daily (max: 1500 mg/day) Dapsone Infants and children: 2 mg/kg/dose daily OR 4 mg/kg/dose weekly Adolescents: 100 mg/day in 1-2 divided doses (monotherapy) (max: 100 mg/day or 200 mg/wk) TMP/SMX breakthrough: 0-0.2% Cons to 2nd line agents -Dapsone-heme toxicities (aplastic anemia, dyscrasias, G6PD deficiency, derm, peripheral neuropathy, heptotoxicity) -Atovaquone-PO absorption issues, hepatotoxicity Prevention and treatment of cancer-related infections (Version 1). National Comprehensive Cancer Network Website. Updated August Accessed April 2015. Altman AJ, ed. Supportive Care of Children with Cancer. Baltimore, MD.: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 2004.

6 Previous Data Kim SY, et al. DeMasi JM, et al. Clark A, et al.
Study design Retrospective chart analysis between 1/2001 and 5/2006 Retrospective chart analysis between 1/2005 and 9/2011 Retrospective chart analysis between 1/2010 and 7/2013 Population 232 pediatric oncology pts ± allogeneic/autologous BMT BMT patients: 46% 137 pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant pts Autologous SCT: 32% Allogeneic SCT: 68% 333 pediatric transplant patients BMT patients: 85.2% Intervention Monthly IV pentamidine 4 mg/kg, as second-line prophylaxis, if TMP/SMX not tolerated 4 mg/kg, as first-line prophylaxis IV pentamidine 4 mg/kg every 3-4 wks, as first- or second-line prophylaxis Results Breakthrough rates Total: 1.3% BMT patients: 1.9% < 2 yo: 6.5% < 2 yo + BMT: 9.1% Total: 0% < 2 yo: 0% Total 0.3% Adverse events No significant intolerances Total: 9% Nausea/vomiting (10%) Anaphylactic reactions (2%) Pentamidine d/c: (9%) IV pentamidine → inh pentamidine: (9%) Total (BMT; 6.6%) Tachycardia (2%) Shortness of breath (1.4%) Pancreatitis, QTc prolongation , ↑LFTs (0.7%) Fever, numbness/tingling, anaphylaxis (0.35%) Demasi: one of the anaphylactic rxns occurred d/t inc admin rate of pentamidine. Slower infusion rates did not result in any rxns Higher breakthrough rates in younger patients may be associated with the type of immunodeficiencies seen in younger children and increased drg metabolism in that cohort of patients (elimination half life of IV pentamidine is days Pentamidine frequency (Levy, ER, et al. PIDJ. 2016;35(2): 2009 survey: 20/25 HSCT centers in Primary Immunodeficiency Treatment Consortium use pentamidine as their preferred 2nd line agent --10/20 administer it q4wks --3/20 administer it q3wks --7/20 administer it q2wks (Cowan 2009, personal communication) Kim SY, et al. Pediatr Blood Cancer DeMasi JM, et al. Pediatr Infect Dis J Clark A, et al. Pediatr Transplantation

7 Study Rationale Limited published data
Hematopoietic stem cell transplant patient population IV pentamidine as second-line agent IV Pentamidine Practice at NYULMC Used when TMP/SMX is not preferred Often given first-line over TMP/SMX Dosed every 3-4 weeks Information gaps IV pentamidine’s effectiveness As first-line prophylaxis In non-transplant population

8

9 Study Objective Describe the effectiveness and safety of IV pentamidine as PCP prophylaxis, when administered every 3 to 4 weeks, in pediatric hematology/oncology patients

10 Study Design IRB approved retrospective chart review
Patients identified from electronic health record databases All patients who received pentamidine Data collected by review of electronic health records Baseline demographics TMP/SMX use and reasons for discontinuation Pentamidine use as a first- and second-line prophylactic agent and frequency of administration Changes in blood pressure, electrolytes, liver/renal/cardiac function Adverse effects Descriptive statistics Demographics: malignancy diagnosis and receipt of chemotherapy/radiation/SCTs Aes: such as nausea, fatigue, and infusion-site reactions

11 Study Design Inclusion criteria Definitions Patient follow-up
Patients ≤ 22 years old Patients who received ≥ 1 dose of IV pentamidine, from 1/2009 to 7/2014, in inpatient and outpatient settings Definitions Possible PCP Hypoxic respiratory distress Radiographic evidence of PCP On treatment for PCP Probable PCP Methenamine silver stain Direct fluorescent antibody Polymerase chain reaction Sputum culture Patient follow-up 6 months post last documented IV pentamidine dose OR Death OR Last clinic visit/hospital admission Patient follow-up: which ever was furthest Orgel E, Rushing T. Pediatr Infec Dis J

12 Study Endpoints Primary Outcome Secondary Outcomes
Incidence of breakthrough PCP Secondary Outcomes Incidence of adverse effects Infusion-site reactions Allergies Nausea Fatigue Blood chemistry changes

13 Population Reviewed, N = 184 Included, n = 122
Not included, n = 62 Age > 22 yrs, n = 39 Inadequate documentation of IV pentamidine in medical record, n = 21 IV pentamidine for PCP treatment, n = 2 Included, n = 122 IV pentamidine first-line, n = 75 IV pentamidine second-line, n = 47

14 Patient Characteristics
Demographic Data* All Patients (N = 122) Age†, yr  5.5 (3-13) Age ≤ 2 yr 24 (20) Sex, male  74 (61) Race Caucasian 50 (41) Other 38 (31) Asian 13 (11) African American 12 (10) Hispanic 7 (6) Unknown 2 (2) Actual weight†, kg  22.2 ( ) BMI†, kg/m2  17.9 ( ) *All values expressed as n (%), unless otherwise specified †Values expressed as median (IQR)

15 Patient Characteristics
Demographic Data* All Patients (N = 122) Diagnosis Acute lymphoblastic leukemia 50 (41) Brain tumor 38 (31) Other hematological malignancy 12 (10) Sarcoma 7 (6) Acute myeloid leukemia 5 (4) Lymphoma 4 (3) Solid tumor 3 (2) Chemotherapy 117 (96) Radiation 24 (20) Concomitant corticosteroids 94 (77) Stem cell transplant Autologous Allogeneic *All values expressed as n (%), unless otherwise specified

16 Patient Characteristics
PCP Prophylaxis* All Patients (N = 122) Pentamidine First-line 75 (61) Second-line 47 (39) Frequency, wks Every 4 wks 68 (56) Every 3 wks 28 (23) Once 25 (20) Duration†, mos 3 (1-6) Total doses† 3 ( ) Third-line agents‡ Atovaquone 2 (2) Dapsone *All values expressed as n (%), unless otherwise specified †Values expressed as median (IQR) ‡Administered after TMP/SMX and IV pentamidine

17 Patient Characteristics
PCP Prophylaxis Before Pentamidine* All Patients (N = 122) SMX/TMP 71 (58) First-line 51 (72) Duration prior to pentamidine†, mos 4.5 (2-11) Reason for discontinuation, n = 51 Myelosuppression 28 (55) Drug interaction 11 (22) Unknown 9 (18) Non-compliance 4 (8) GI symptoms Rash 2 (4) Allergy 1 (2) Inability to take PO medications *All values expressed as n (%), unless otherwise specified †Values expressed as median (IQR)

18 Primary Outcome: Breakthrough PCP Rates
No breakthrough PCP identified during entirety of IV pentamidine treatment course, up to 6 months post discontinuation, death, or last available record

19 Pentamidine Toxicity Profile
Adverse events (AE)*,† All Patients (N = 122) Total number of patients with AE 19 (16) Patients with > 1 AE 4 (21) Discontinuation due to AEs 3 (16) Allergic reaction 5 (26) Nausea Facial/nose/labial/tongue tingling Hypotension‡ Perioral numbness 2 (11) Extravasation 1 (5) Fatigue Blood chemistry changes *All values expressed as n (%), unless otherwise specified † AEs assessed within 3 days of IV pentamidine administration, while changes in electrolytes and other serum levels were assessed with 7 days of IV pentamidine administration ‡n=35

20 Discussion Breakthrough PCP rates throughout follow-up period:
0% for both first (n = 63)- and second (n = 37)-line pentamidine regimens 0% for non-SCT pts (n = 84) 0% for ≤ 2 yo subset (n = 21) Compared to published literature, similar adverse event profile Newly recognized: facial tingling No clinically significant changes in laboratory values noted within 7 days post-pentamidine administration Kim et al. : <2yo n = 31 (13%), non-SCT n = 125 (54%) Demase et al: <2yo n = 12 (9%), non-SCT n = 0 Clark et al: n=333 (0.3%)

21 Study Limitations Single-center study Retrospective chart analysis
No power analysis Retrospective chart analysis Data not available for all patients Inconsistent intrapatient administration intervals No PO TMP/SMX comparator Use of TMP/SMX before/after IV pentamidine may have confounded incidence of breakthrough PCP Not all patients who developed pneumonia were worked up for PCP Lack of clinical PCP may be an underrepresentation Presented data may only be extrapolated to pediatric population

22 Conclusion IV pentamidine is a safe, tolerable, and effective agent for PCP prophylaxis in pediatric hematology/oncology patients No breakthrough PCP was noted throughout the entire course of pentamidine, through 6 months post discontinuation IV pentamidine is a reasonable therapeutic alternative when TMP/SMX is not preferred for PCP prophylaxis

23 Acknowledgements Liana Klejmont, PharmD, BCPS
Clinical Manager, Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Marco R. Scipione, PharmD, BCPS, AQ-ID Pharmacotherapist, Infectious Diseases Yanina Dubrovskaya, PharmD, BCPS, AQ-ID Clinical Manager, Infectious Diseases Jennifer Lighter, MD Pediatric Hospital Epidemiologist John Papadopoulos, BS, PharmD, FCCM, BCNSP Critical Care Pharmacist Director, Pharmacy Residency Program Pharmacotherapist, Critical Care

24

25 Safety and Effectiveness of Intravenous Pentamidine for Prophylaxis of Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia in Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Patients Loriel Solodokin, PharmD. Assistant Professor of Pharmacy Practice, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences University Clinical Oncology Pharmacist, Dana Farber Cancer Institute/Massachusetts General Hospital BIT 3rd Annual World Congress of Pediatrics November 2, 2017


Download ppt "Safety and Effectiveness of Intravenous Pentamidine for Prophylaxis of Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia in Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Patients Loriel."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google