Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

A comparison of results with eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy from the Vascular Quality Initiative and the Mid-America Vascular Study.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "A comparison of results with eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy from the Vascular Quality Initiative and the Mid-America Vascular Study."— Presentation transcript:

1 A comparison of results with eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy from the Vascular Quality Initiative and the Mid-America Vascular Study Group  Joseph R. Schneider, MD, PhD, Irene B. Helenowski, MS, PhD, Cheryl R. Jackson, MSN, MS, RN, Michael J. Verta, MD, Kimberly C. Zamor, MD, Nilesh H. Patel, MD, Stanley Kim, MD, Andrew W. Hoel, MD  Journal of Vascular Surgery  Volume 61, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015) DOI: /j.jvs Copyright © 2015 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

2 Fig Predicted patient survival (%) vs time of follow-up (years) for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The upper and lower traces for conventional CEA (CCEA; black lines) and eversion CEA (ECEA; red lines) represent the standard error of the mean, which never reaches or exceeds 10% for either CEA type. Journal of Vascular Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2015 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions


Download ppt "A comparison of results with eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy from the Vascular Quality Initiative and the Mid-America Vascular Study."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google