Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published bySusanne Bäcker Modified over 5 years ago
1
Prognostic relevance of Masaoka and Müller-Hermelink classification in patients with thymic tumors
Didier Lardinois, MD, Renate Rechsteiner, MD, R.Hubert Läng, MD, Matthias Gugger, MD, Daniel Betticher, MD, Christian von Briel, MD, Thorsten Krueger, MD, Hans-Beat Ris, MD The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 69, Issue 5, Pages (May 2000) DOI: /S (00)
2
Fig 1 Histologic features of thymic tumors according to the Marino and Müller-Hermelink classification. (A) medullary tumor, (B) mixed tumors, (C) organoid tumor, (D) cortical tumor, (E) well-differentiated thymic carcinoma, and (F) endocrine carcinoma (hematoxylin and eosin, original magnification ×400). The Annals of Thoracic Surgery , DOI: ( /S (00) )
3
Fig 2 Kaplan-Meier–generated overall survival curves of patients after complete resection of thymic tumors according to the (A) Masaoka staging and (B) Marino and Müller-Hermelink classification. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery , DOI: ( /S (00) )
4
Fig 3 Kaplan-Meier–generated disease-free survival curves of patients after complete resection of thymic tumors according to the (A) Masaoka staging and (B) Marino and Müller-Hermelink classification. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery , DOI: ( /S (00) )
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.