1. Planning, Conducting, and Implementing Research Peer Exchanges
David M. Jared, P.E.
Asst. State Research Eng.
Georgia DOT
July 25, 2016

2. Overview Peer exchange concept General mechanics
Varieties of exchanges
Example best practices
Program review and next steps
High-level introduction

3. Peer Exchange Concept
Allows each state DOT research program to evaluate itself through a team of peers where exchange of ideas and best practices could provide mutual programmatic benefit
Each state DOT required to host at least every five (5) years
Written report to FHWA required

4. General Mechanics SP&R Funds may be used Programming
Standalone project
Pooled-fund option: TPF-5(031), “Support Services for Peer Exchanges”

5. Varieties of Exchanges
Traditional
Host state, a few other states, FHWA division staff, academia
Multi-state
Participating states share results
Virtual multi-state
Remote attendance
Third-party facilitation

6. Example Best Practices
Ad hoc participation
FHWA division office staff
Key academic partners
TRB staff
Discussion facilitator
Third-party assistance with travel
Report template
Off-site, complementary activities
Management attendance and/or briefings

7. Program Review & Next Steps
Peer exchange programmatic review
NCHRP , “Support for AASHTO-RAC Activities”
Comprehensive, third-party review of best practices since 2001
Survey of RAC members a key element
Next steps
Results to be presented to RAC and SCOR (2017)
Recommendations for programmatic improvements