Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

High temperature steam electrolysis (HTSE) for hydrogen production:

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "High temperature steam electrolysis (HTSE) for hydrogen production:"— Presentation transcript:

1 High temperature steam electrolysis (HTSE) for hydrogen production:
from material developement to stack operation Julie Mougin, G. Gousseau, B. Morel, F. Lefebvre-Joud, F. Le Naour, F. Chauveau, J.C. Grenier CEA-Grenoble, France ICMCB-Bordeaux, France Fourth NEA Information Exchange Meeting on Nuclear Production of Hydrogen Chicago, Oakbrook, 13 – 16 April 2009 "WP6 Green Fuel Cell meeting - Grenoble 19/01/06"

2 HTSE: from material development to stack operation
Outline Introduction Experimental Stack/SRU design New cell electrode material Results Stack performances and short-term durability SRU performances New cell electrode performance Conclusions

3 Instrumented SRU (single repeat unit) Materials and components
Introduction High temperature steam electrolysis (HTSE) = one of the most promising “clean” processes for massive production of hydrogen Nuclear energy considered to provide electricity and heat to split water molecule into H2 and O2 Necessity of highly efficient systems in order to avoid too many dedicated nuclear power plants  each component has to be optimized, from the balance of plant to the stack and to the solid oxide electrolyzer cell (SOEC) CEA (French Atomic Energy Commission) is carrying out researches in this field:  To identify and understand specificities of stack environment To investigate new solutions in stack environment Instrumented SRU (single repeat unit)  To increase hydrogen production and durability Cell materials, coatings and sealings Materials and components Several designs specific to HTSE  One low-weight stack Stack design

4 Experimental: Stack Stack designed at CEA targeting:
Low weight: stamped sheets High compactness: 2 MW/m3 of power density Easy assembling Simple operation Planar and square cells: 150 x 150 mm², active area 200 cm² Electrolyte supported cell: TZ3Y electrolyte: 90 µm thick Ni-CGO hydrogen electrode LSM oxygen electrode Interconnects: Inconel600 no coatings up to now Two short stacks made of 3 cells tested

5 Experimental: SRU SRU designed in the framework of the European Project RelHy (coordinated by CEA, FP7) Design Robust, easy to instrument Planar and square cells: 120 x 120 mm², active area 100 cm² Electrolyte supported cell or electrode supported cell Electrolyte supported cell: TZ3Y electrolyte: 90 µm thick Ni-CGO hydrogen electrode (La,Sr)(Co,Fe)O3 oxygen electrode (LSCF) Glass sealings Crofer22APU with coatings

6 Experimental: cell with new electrode material
New electrode material jointly developed by ICMCB and CEA: Nickelate Nd2NiO4+δ for oxygen electrode Mixed electronic and ionic conductivity due to large oxygen overstoichiometry Screen printed on commercial half electrolyte supported cell Oxygen electrode Nd2NiO4+δ 30 µm TZ3Y electrolyte: 90 µm thick Hydrogen electrode Ni-CGO 30 µm Tested in planar and circular button cell: active area 3.14 cm² (diam. 20 mm) Comparison with the same electrolyte supported cell but containing classical LSM oxygen electrode

7 Experimental: testing procedure
Stack: T = 820°C Pure water vapor at the hydrogen electrode SRU: T = 800°C Several ratio of H2O/H2 to the hydrogen electrode 90% H2O / 10% H2 70% H2O / (10% H2 / 20% N2) 50% H2O / (10% H2 / 40% N2) Cell: T = °C Gas to the hydrogen electrode: 35% H2O / 37% H2 / 28% Ar Stack/SRU/cell Performance: i-V curve ASR measured at 1.3 V Stack durability: Under galvanostatic control to achieve ~ 1.3 V per cell

8 Results: Stack performances
i-V curves obtained at 820°C in pure water vapor at the hydrogen electrode ASR (.cm²) at 1.3 V Test 1 Test 2 Cell 1 2.45 2.95 Cell 2 2.37 2.24 Cell 3 1.93 2.73 Design validated through two consistent tests Hydrogen production: 6.7 and 6.6 mg/cm²/h at 1.3V Corresponding steam utilization: 64% and 52% For comparison: single cell performance: ASR = 1.4 .cm² Loss of 0.5 to 1.6 .cm² due to contacting issues in the stack Next step: coatings and contact layers on interconnects

9 Results: Stack durability
Durability curve at 820°C – galvanostatic control (36 A) Lowest degradation rate on central cell Higher degradation rates on extreme cells Event: V increase associated to T increase Crack in the cell ? U (t=0) U (t=406 h) Degradation ΔV/1000 h %/1000 h Cell 1 1.40 1.67 0.677 49 Cell 2 1.24 1.29 0.123 10 Cell 3 1.33 1.52 0.468 35

10 Results: SRU performance
i-V curves obtained at 800°C in H2O/H2/N2 (several ratio) ASR50/50 =0.86 .cm² ASR70/30=0.84 .cm² ASR90/10= 0.77 .cm² Cathodic gas composition: secondary effect on the SRU performance

11 Results: SRU performance
i-V curves obtained at 800°C in H2O/H2/N2 (several ratio) Gas mixture at cathode side ASR (.cm²) at 1.3 V H2 production (mg/cm²/h) at 1.3V H2 production (mg/cm²/h) at 1.5V Steam utilization rate (%) at 1.5 V 50%H2O -10%H2- 40%N2 0.86 18.7 26.2 62 87 70%H2O -10%H2- 20%N2 0.84 19.8 28.0 47 67 90%H2O -10%H2 0.77 20.9 29.9 39 55 Performances improved compared to stack thanks to the use of improved cell and of coatings Lowest target of the RelHy project achieved: 30 mg/cm²/h

12 Results: cell performance
i-V curves obtained at °C in H2O/H2/Ar Current density Cell voltage Hydrogen production Nd2NiO4+ LSM Performance increase thanks to Nd2NiO4+: 1.7, 3 and 4.2 times at 850, 800 and 750°C respectively  Nd2NiO4+ particularly appropriate for T<800°C T (°C) ASR at 1.3 V (.cm2) H2 production (mg/cm²/h) at 1.3 V 750 0.96 15.0 800 0.58 23.9 850 0.43 32.5 Good H2 production: level better than RelHy SRU due to improved electrode material

13 Results: cell performance
i-V curves obtained at °C in H2O/H2/Ar Current density Cell voltage Hydrogen production Nd2NiO4+ LSM Hysteresis effect: Joule heating effect? Activation phenomenon?

14 Conclusions The stack design has been validated through two consistent tests of 3 cells stacks: ASR ~ 2-3 .cm² at 820°C H2 production ~ 7 mg/cm²/h at 1.3 V Degradation rate evaluated for 400 hours: 10% /1000h on central cell 35 and 49% /1000h on extreme cells SRU: ASR ~ .cm² at 800°C H2 production ~ 20 mg/cm²/h at 1.3 V Cell with new oxygen electrode Nd2NiO4+: ASR ~ 0.6 .cm² at 800°C H2 production ~ 24 mg/cm²/h at 1.3 V Performances 3 times higher than with regular LSM oxygen electrode Material particularly suitable at T<800°C

15 Perspectives Stack: Use of coatings and contact layers to improve performances and durability Test of 1 kWe stack SRU: Durability test Further improvement of performances Cell with new oxygen electrode Nd2NiO4+: Integration into large cells Test in stack/SRU environment Durability test

16 Ackowledgments Colleagues:
From CEA: André Cahtroux, Patrick Mayoussier, Patrick Le Gallo, Pierre Baurens From ICMCB: Jean-Marc Bassat, Fabrice Mauvy From ECN: Jan-Pieter Ouweltjes The French research Agency (ANR) and its Hydrogen and Fuel Cells program (Pan-H) for co-financing the SEMI-EHT project The European Commission for co-financing the RelHy project


Download ppt "High temperature steam electrolysis (HTSE) for hydrogen production:"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google