Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Doripenem vs Meropenem: a summary of International and Belgian published data Françoise Van Bambeke, Unité de Pharmacologie cellulaire et moléculaire Louvain.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Doripenem vs Meropenem: a summary of International and Belgian published data Françoise Van Bambeke, Unité de Pharmacologie cellulaire et moléculaire Louvain."— Presentation transcript:

1 Doripenem vs Meropenem: a summary of International and Belgian published data
Françoise Van Bambeke, Unité de Pharmacologie cellulaire et moléculaire Louvain Drug Research Institute Université catholique de Louvain Brussels, Belgium Advisory Board AstraZeneca, Brussels – 02/02/2009 02/02/2009 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board

2 Classification of parenteral carbapenems
Group 1 Limited activity on non-fermentative Gram(-) Ertapenem Panipenem Group 2 Active on non-fermentative Gram(-) Impinem Meropenem Biapenem Doripenem Group 3 Group 2 + MRSA CS-023 (investigational) Shah et al. CMI (2008) 14 suppl. 1 : 02/02/2009 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board

3 Structure of the molecules
no lateral chain methyl subst.  Resistance to -lactamases No endocyclic S  Strong binding to PBP  VERY broad spectrum Zwitterion Penetration in Gram(-), including Pseudomonas meropenem doripenem 02/02/2009 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board

4 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board
In vitro activity 02/02/2009 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board

5 In vitro activity against selected Gram-(-) bacteria
Range of MIC90 values organism Nb strains DOR MEM Enterobacter spp 3951 E. coli 17483 ESBL (+) 886  0.06 Klebsiella spp 5920 K. pneumoniae 1625 88 Proteus mirabilis 2052 0.12-1 40 0.25 0.12 Serratia spp 619 Acinetobacter spp 2974  8-32 > 8-32 Pseudomonas aeruginosa 11990 0.5->8 1-16 non -S 937 16-64 1 (to 2) dilutions difference in MIC, most often in advantage to MEM ! Keam, Drugs (2008) 68: 02/02/2009 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board

6 Susceptibility to resistance mechanisms
Influence of resistance mechanisms in Pseudomonas carbapenem MexAB MexEF OprD metallo -lactamase imipenem S r / R R meropenem r doripenem nd R : MIC > 8 mg/L r : MIC < 8 mg/L Dalhoff et al., Biochem. Pharmacol. (2006) 71: 02/02/2009 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board

7 Selection of resistance in vitro
MPC in Pseudomonas frequency of resistance selection: < ~ 10-8 MIC/Cmin > 6 Tam et al. AAC (2005) 49:4920-7 Sakyo et al., J. Antibiot. (2006) 59: 02/02/2009 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board

8 Pharmacokinetics / Pharmacodynamics
02/02/2009 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board

9 Comparative PK profile
Single dose PK parameter DOR MEM (500 mg) (1g) Cmax (mg/L) 20.2 26 50-60 Prot. binding (%) 8.9 2 AUC (mg.h/L) – 8 h 44.1 T ½ (h) 0.93 1 Zhanel et al., Drugs (2007) 67: 02/02/2009 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board

10 Comparative PK profile
Bolus vs Prolonged infusion parameter DOR (500 mg) MEM (1g) (Bol) (Prol) Cmax (mg/L) 23 8 112 30 AUC (mg.h/L) – 8 h 36 17 136 186 T > CMI 1 55 80 75 98 T > CMI 4 27.5 57 73 T > CMI 8 17.5 - 46 58 Kim et al., AAC (2008) 52: Jaruratanasirikul et al., AAC (2005) 49: 02/02/2009 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board

11 Doripenem : PK/PD modeling
PK/PD in support to dosing : t > MIC ~ 35 % 500 mg ; q 8 h 4 h infusion : MIC = 8 MPC 33 % 70 % 1 h infusion : MIC = 2 Bhavnani et al., AAC (2005) 49: 02/02/2009 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board

12 Meropenem: PK/PD modeling
PK/PD in support to dosing : t > MIC ~ 35 % 1 g ; q 8 h 3 h infusion : MIC = 18 0.5 h infusion : MIC = 8 MPC 40 % 65 % Li et al. J Clin Pharmacol. (2006) 46:1171-8 02/02/2009 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board

13 Doripenem : PK/PD modeling
Probability of target attainment rate based on Monte Carlo simulation 0.5 h infusion : MIC = 2 4 h infusion : MIC = 4 Ikawa et al., Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. (2008) 62:292-7 02/02/2009 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board

14 Meropenem : PK/PD modeling
Probability of target attainment rate based on Monte Carlo simulation 0.5 h infusion : MIC = 1.5 1 g ; q 8 h 3 h infusion : MIC = 4 Li et al., J. Clin. Pharmacol (2006) 46: 02/02/2009 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board

15 Meropenem vs Doripenem: PD vs EUCAST bkpts
(500 mg 3 x) MEM (1 g 3 x) EUCAST enterobacteriaceae 1 / 4 2 / 8 Pseudomonas PD short infusion 2 PD prolonged infusion 4 Li et al., J. Clin. Pharmacol (2006) 46: 02/02/2009 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board

16 Meropenem vs Doripenem: stability for prolonged infusion
% of intact molecule remaining after the indicated time of incubation at room T° DOR MEM End of infusion 95-97 % (4h) ~ 95 % (3h) 12 h 93-95 % ~70 % Time > 90 % (literature) > 12 h 5.15 h (SmPC) 8 h Psathas et al., Clin Ther. (2008) 30: Viaene et al., AAC (2002) 46: 02/02/2009 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board

17 Meropenem vs Doripenem: MICs vs EUCAST bkpts
MIC distribution in enterobacteriacae (USA strains) Pillar et al., Antimicrob Agents Chemother : 02/02/2009 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board

18 Meropenem vs Doripenem: MICs vs EUCAST bkpts
MIC distribution in Pseudomonas (USA strains) Pillar et al., Antimicrob Agents Chemother : 02/02/2009 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board

19 Meropenem vs Doripenem: MICs vs EUCAST bkpts
MIC distribution in Pseudomonas (Canada) ICAAC 2008 C 02/02/2009 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board

20 Meropenem vs Doripenem: MICs vs EUCAST bkpts
MIC distribution in Pseudomonas (Europe) ~ 90 % ~ 90 % ~ 90 % ~ 90 % ~ 80 % ~ 75 % ~ 80 % ~ 80 % ECCMID 2008 P1168; 2007 P1664; 2087 02/02/2009 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board

21 Meropenem : MICs in Belgium vs EUCAST bkpts
MIC distribution in Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas ~ 100 % ~ 85 % ~ 75 % What about doripenem ? ICAAC 2008 C1 097 02/02/2009 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board

22 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board
Clinical efficacy 02/02/2009 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board

23 Respiratory tract infections
doripenem Keam, Drugs (2008) 68: 02/02/2009 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board

24 Respiratory tract infections
meropenem; ~ 20 % of Pseudomonas study Nb patients randomized Treatment regimen Response rate (clinical) Response rate (bacterio) HAP 211 MEM 1 g q8h 89 /87 * 89 / 91 * (Cefta 2g + Tob 1mg/kg) q8h 72 / 72 * 67 / 69 * 84 81 73 Cefta 2 g q8h + AMK 15 mg/kg 72 76 VAP 140 MEM 1 g q8hv b 82.5 74.5 66.1 53.3 * ventilated patients (70 %) Sieger et al., Crit Care Med. (1997) 25: Mouton et al., J Antimicrob Chemother. (1995) 36 Suppl A:145-56 Alvarez Lerna et al., J. Chemother. (2001) 13:70-81 02/02/2009 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board

25 Respiratory tract infections: DOR vs IMI
Microbiological success Chastre et al., Crit. Care Med. (2008) 36: 02/02/2009 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board

26 ICU infections: MEM vs IMI (Belgian study)
Patient characteristics Verwaest et al., Clin. Microbiol. Infect. (2001) 6: 02/02/2009 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board

27 ICU infections: MEM vs IMI (Belgian study)
Clinical/microbiological response Verwaest et al., Clin. Microbiol. Infect. (2001) 6: 02/02/2009 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board

28 ICU infections: MEM vs IMI (Belgian study)
microbiological response Verwaest et al., Clin. Microbiol. Infect. (2001) 6: 02/02/2009 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board

29 Intra-abdominal infections : DOR vs MEM
Design Patients with IAI, surgical intervention < 24 h + AB needed exclusion : uncomplicated infections APACHE II > 30 life-threatening illness necrotizing pancreatitis / pancreatic abcess infection by pathogen R to one of the studied drugs Patients profile 91 % APACHE II < 10 60 % appendix; 20 % colon 10 % post-operative Treatment DOR 500 mg x 3; 1h vs MEM 1 g x 3 ; 5 minutes Lucasti et al., Clin. Ther (2008) 30:868-83 02/02/2009 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board

30 Intra-abdominal infections: DOR vs MEM
Microbiology Lucasti et al., Clin. Ther (2008) 30:868-83 02/02/2009 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board

31 Intra-abdominal infections: DOR vs MEM
Clinical success Lucasti et al., Clin. Ther (2008) 30:868-83 02/02/2009 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board

32 Intra-abdominal infections: DOR vs MEM
Microbiological evaluation Lucasti et al., Clin. Ther (2008) 30:868-83 02/02/2009 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board

33 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board
Safety profile 02/02/2009 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board

34 Safety - Intra-abdominal infections
Lucasti et al., Clin. Ther (2008) 30:868-83 02/02/2009 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board

35 Comparative safety profile
Lucasti et al., Clin. Ther (2008) 30:868-83 02/02/2009 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board

36 Meropenem safety profile
Linden, Drug Saf. (2007) 30:657-68 02/02/2009 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board

37 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board
Neurotoxicity binding affinity for GABA receptors depending of (+) charge of the side chain drug IC 50 (mM) imipenem 0.5 meropenem 27.6 doripenem 50.0 X 55 X 1.8 Dalhoff et al., Biochem. Pharmacol. (2006) 71: 02/02/2009 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board

38 Meropenem safety profile
Linden, Drug Saf. (2007) 30:657-68 02/02/2009 AstraZenaca-Advisory Board


Download ppt "Doripenem vs Meropenem: a summary of International and Belgian published data Françoise Van Bambeke, Unité de Pharmacologie cellulaire et moléculaire Louvain."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google