Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Quantum mechanics on giant scales

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Quantum mechanics on giant scales"— Presentation transcript:

1 Quantum mechanics on giant scales
Gravitational wave detectors Quantum nature of light Quantum states of mirrors Nergis GRC, March 2010

2 Outline Quantum limit in gravitational wave detectors
Origins of the quantum limit EM vacuum fluctuations Interactions of light with mirrors Getting past the quantum limit Experiments Quantum optics Quantum optomechanics Necessary building blocks in the classical regime Progress toward the quantum regime

3 Gravitational waves (GWs)
Prediction of Einstein’s General Relativity (1916) Indirect detection led to Nobel prize in 1993 Ripples of the space-time fabric GWs stretch and squeeze the space transverse to direction of propagation Emitted by accelerating massive objects Cosmic explosions Compact stars orbiting each other Stars gobbling up stars “Mountains” on stellar crusts

4 GW detector at a glance Mirrors hang as pendulums Quasi-free particles
Respond to passing GW Filter external force noise 4 km 20 kW Optical cavities Mirrors facing each other Builds up light power Lots of laser power P Signal  P Noise  10 W

5 Quantum noise in Initial LIGO
Shot noise Photon counting statistics Radiation pressure noise Fluctuating photon number exerts a fluctuating force

6 Advanced LIGO Quantum noise limited
Radiation pressure noise Stronger measurement  larger backaction Shot noise More laser power  stronger measurement

7 Origin of the Quantum Noise Vacuum fluctuations

8 Quantum states of light
Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle Coherent state (laser light) Squeezed state Two complementary observables Make on noise better for one quantity, BUT it gets worse for the other X1 and X2 associated with amplitude and phase X1 X2

9 Quantum Noise in an Interferometer
Caves, Phys. Rev. D (1981) Slusher et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. (1985) Xiao et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. (1987) McKenzie et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. (2002) Vahlbruch et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. (2005) Goda et al., Nature Physics (2008) Radiation pressure noise Quantum fluctuations exert fluctuating force  mirror displacement X1 X2 Laser X1 X2 Shot noise limited  (number of photons)1/2 Arbitrarily below shot noise X1 X2 X1 X2 Vacuum fluctuations Squeezed vacuum

10 Radiation pressure rules!
Experiments in which radiation pressure forces dominate over mechanical forces Opportunity to study quantum effects in macroscopic systems Observation of quantum radiation pressure Generation of squeezed states of light Quantum ground state of the gram-scale mirror Entanglement of mirror and light quantum states Classical light-oscillator coupling effects en route (dynamical backaction) Optical cooling and trapping Light is stiffer than diamond

11 Reaching the quantum limit in mechanical oscillators
The goal is to measure non-classical effects with large objects like the (kilo)gram-scale mirrors The main challenge  thermally driven mechanical fluctuations Need to freeze out thermal fluctuations Zero-point fluctuations remain One measure of quantumness is the thermal occupation number Want N  1 Colder oscillator Stiffer oscillator

12 Mechanical vs. optical forces
Mechanical forces  thermal noise Stiffer spring (Wm ↑)  larger thermal noise More damping (Qm ↓)  larger thermal noise Optical forces do not affect thermal noise spectrum Fluctuation-dissipation theorem Connect a high Q, low stiffness mechanical oscillator to a stiff optical spring  DILUTION Dilution – a fraction of the energy of the oscillator is stored in the optical field instead of in the elastic flexing of the wire, or in the acoustic modes The optical spring shifts the oscillator's resonant frequency while leaving its mechanical losses unchanged. The mechanical quality factor $Q_M$, as limited by those losses, is increased by the factor $\Omega_{\rmeff} / \Omega_M$, where $\Omega_M$ is the natural frequency of the free mechanical oscillator. We refer to this as ``optical dilution'', analogous to the phenomenon of ``damping dilution'' that accounts for the fact that the $Q$ of the pendulum mode can be much higher than the mechanical $Q$ of the material of which it is made~\cite{saulsonPRD1990,dilution}. This mitigation of intrinsic thermal noise is possible because a fraction of the energy is stored in the (noiseless) gravitational field. In the case of the pendulum, the dilution factor depends on the amount of elastic energy stored in the flexing wire compared to the energy stored in the gravitational field -- approximated by the ratio of the gravitational spring constant to the mechanical spring constant. Optical dilution accounts for the fact that thermal noise in our mechanical oscillator is reduced due to energy stored in the optical field (the optical spring force acts similar to the gravitational force). True for any non-mechanical force ( non-dissipative or “cold” force ), e.g. gravitation, electronic, magnetic

13 Optical springs and damping
Restoring Damping Anti-damping Anti-restoring Radiation pressure of light in an optical cavity  force on mirror Detune a resonant cavity to higher frequency (blueshift) Real component of optical force  restoring But imaginary component (cavity time delay)  anti-damping Unstable Can stabilize with feedback Cavity cooling Optical spring Blue shift (flaser > fcavity) optical spring Red shift (flaser < fcavity)  cavity cooling

14 Experimental cavity setup
10% 90% 5 W Optical fibers 1 gram mirror Coil/magnet pairs for actuation (x5)‏

15 10 W, frequency and intensity stabilized laser External vibration isolation

16 Trapping and cooling Dynamic backaction cooling
Stable optical trap with two colors Stiff! Stable! T. Corbitt et al., Phys. Rev. Lett 98, (2007)

17 Active feedback cooling
Measure mirror displacement Filter displacement signal Feed it back to mirror as a force Controller PDH Laser Continuous measurement  measurement-induced decoherence EOM PBS QWP Continuous measurement  measurement-induced decoherence

18 Optical spring with active feedback cooling
Experimental improvements Reduce mechanical resonance frequency (from 172 Hz to 13 Hz) Reduce frequency noise by shortening cavity (from 1m to 0.1 m) Electronic feedback cooling instead of all optical Cooling factor = 43000 Teff = 6.9 mK N = 105 Mechanical Q = 20000 Cooling factor larger than mechanical Q because Gamma = Omega_eff/Q. The OS increases Omega but doesn’t affect Gamma (OS is non-mechanical), so Q must increase to keep Gamma constant. T. Corbitt, C. Wipf, T. Bodiya, D. Ottaway, D. Sigg, N. Smith, S. Whitcomb, and N. Mavalvala, Phys. Rev. Lett 99, (2007)

19 Classical noise, be vanquished
Squeezed Vacuum fluctuations Two identical cavities with 1 gram mirrors at the ends Common-mode rejection cancels out laser noise

20 Squeezing Squeezing 7 dB or 2.25x
T. Corbitt, Y. Chen, F. Khalili, D.Ottaway, S.Vyatchanin, S. Whitcomb, and N. Mavalvala, Phys. Rev A 73, (2006)

21 Present status Blue curve = noise with 50 mW of input power and detuning = 1 Red line = noise level required to observe sqz and quant. rp with 5 W of input power

22 Thermal noise, be vanquished!
All glass suspension Bonded with vacseal Glass fibers drawn in-house Large “ears” to isolate mirror from fiber bending point Many iterations on assembly and handling 18 hours

23 Present status 4x Scattered light?

24 Heating, cooling and quanta
Teff = 0.8 mK N = 35000 Wipf, Bodiya, et al. (March 2010)

25 Benchmarking with the free particle SQL
Assuming Q = 1

26 Quantum measurement in gravitational wave detectors

27 Active feedback cooling + spring
Measure mirror displacement Filter displacement signal Feed it back to mirror as a force Controller PDH Laser EOM PBS QWP

28 Cooling the kilogram-scale mirrors of Initial LIGO
Teff = 1.4 mK N = 234 T0/Teff = 2 x 108 Mr ~ 2.7 kg ~ 1026 atoms Wosc = 2 p x 0.7 Hz LIGO Scientific Collaboration

29 Closing remarks

30 Classical radiation pressure effects
Stiffer than diamond 6.9 mK Stable OS Radiation pressure dynamics Optical cooling 10% 90% 5 W ~0.1 to 1 m Corbitt et al. (2007)

31 Quantum radiation pressure effects
Wipf et al. (2007) Entanglement Squeezing Mirror-light entanglement Squeezed vacuum generation

32 LIGO Quantumness N = 234 SQL N = 1

33 Cast of characters MIT Collaborators Thomas Corbitt Christopher Wipf
Timothy Bodiya Sheila Dwyer Nicolas Smith Edith Innerhofer MIT LIGO Lab Collaborators Yanbei Chen and group Stan Whitcomb Daniel Sigg Rolf Bork Alex Ivanov Jay Heefner LIGO Scientific Collaboration


Download ppt "Quantum mechanics on giant scales"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google