Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byTimo Amsel Modified over 4 years ago
8 July 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [IG-NAN PAR Considerations for NAN] Date Submitted: [11/24/2018] Source: [Benjamin A. Rolfe] Company [Blind Creek Associates] Address  Voice:[ ] Re:  Abstract: Launch a discussion on some considerations for determining project scope and content for the NAN standards activity. Purpose: Stimulate discussion in the Interest Group, looking ahead to Study Group work. Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P Rolfe
Some PAR Considerations
8 July 2008 Some PAR Considerations A Semi-Directed Discussion IG-NAN Denver, 2008 Benjamin A. Rolfe Rolfe
Purpose and Goals Launch some Discussion Thinking about SG work
8 July 2008 Purpose and Goals Launch some Discussion Thinking about SG work Get a Good Start Rolfe
8 July 2008 Process in a Nutshell Rolfe
8 July 2008 Rolfe
Range of TG Options Amendment to 802.15.4 LR-WPAN
8 July 2008 Range of TG Options Amendment to LR-WPAN New PHY MAC enhancements related to PHY Coordination with TG4e for other MAC enhancements New standard in (Neighborly WPAN?) New NBFH PHY New MAC New WG for NAN Obviously new everything Rolfe
Pro/Con of Options Amendment to 802.15.4 LR-WPAN
8 July 2008 Pro/Con of Options Amendment to LR-WPAN Most expedient (maybe) Leverages existing 15.4 inertia and synergies (ZigBee, ISA100) Most constrained approach May not satisfy all the NAN requirements Rolfe
Pro/Con of Options New standard in 802.15
8 July 2008 Pro/Con of Options New standard in More flexible technical approach (more options) May get technically more ideal solution Avoids conflicts with legacy 15.4 Avoids bloating May take longer Rolfe
Pro/Con of Options New WG for NAN
8 July 2008 Pro/Con of Options New WG for NAN Obviously new everything, most flexibility Probably take much longer (but who knows?) Up to EC to decide Rolfe
© 2023 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.