1. Math Compaction
Mitch aulakh

2. Background
Investigation of EAP Data and ongoing efforts to fully implement an integrated pathway
Combined ready and conditional rates stayed high for our summative students
How do we ensure that we continue to serve the students that are reaching for the highest level of math possible?

6. What Courses do Our Summative Students Take?
MVUSD Summative Math Student Course Breakdown
Course title
Number
Percent
Adv Alg II/Trig 1
0.2%
Adv Trig 76
14.0%
AP Calculus AB 97
17.8%
AP Calculus BC
AP Statistics 12
2.2%
Calculus 27
5.0%
Other 11
2.0%
Math Stdy IB SL
Pre Calculus
291
53.5%
Prob & Stats
Total
544
25.2%

7. Comparing Old Methods 8th Grade Algebra 1
Pre-Algebra
Grade 8*
Algebra 1
(39.9% State)
(37.1 % County)
Grade 9
Geometry
Grade 10
Algebra II
Grade 11
Pre-Calc
“The K-7 standards contain the prerequisites to prepare students for
Algebra I by 8th grade…” pg. 84
*Data reflect CST taking rates for

8. Comparing Old Methods 7th Grade Algebra 1
(6.0% State)
(7.6% County)
Grade 8
Geometry
Grade 9
Algebra II
Grade 10
Pre-Calc
Grade 11
Calculus AB or BC
*Data reflect CST taking rates for

9. Breaking Down New StandardsRP NS EE F G SP
Total
Grade 6 7 15 12 4 9 47
Grade 7 11 6 13 43
Grade 8 2 5 36 14 28 31 22 26
126 RN Q CN VM
SSE
APR
CED
REI IF BF LE TF
Int 1 3 2 4 7 9 6
Int 2 5 1 8
Int 3
Total 11 12 25 CO
SRT C
GPE
GMD MG ID IC CP MD
Total
Int 1 10 3 11 59
Int 2 9 5 2 68
Int 3 1 4 6 52 13 12 15
179

10. Integrated Math Rollout
Implement one year of integrated pathway to start students on a cohort
Mix of integrated and traditional math pathways temporarily
At what point do we begin compaction? Do we double up on classes, create accelerated tracks, look for dual enrollment opportunities, etc…?
What does the research say as far effective practices for acceleration?

11. Questions?