Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Lake Effect Storms
2
Cold Air Moving Over Water Surface – Steam Fog
Cold air off continent moves over relatively warm water surface Fluxes of heat and moisture from water into air (bulk formulae):
4
Lidar Observation of Steam Fog
5
Lidar Observation of Steam Fog
6
Lidar Observation of Steam Fog
7
Lake Effect Storm Types
Wind/Shear Parallel Bands Shore Parallel Bands Shore based Midlake Mesoscale Vortex
8
Lake Superior Lake Effect
9
Shore Parallel Bands Land breeze mesoscale circulation
Deeper than wind parallel bands ( up to 4 km AGL) Very intense precipitation over a small area May be short lived or last several days
10
Lake Ontario Lake Effects
11
Lake Erie Shore Parallel Band December 24, 2001 Buffalo
12
Lake Erie Shore Parallel Band December 24, 2001 Buffalo
13
Lake Michigan Shore Parallel Band
14
Lake Michigan Shore Parallel Band
15
Lake Michigan Shore Parallel Band
16
Lake Michigan Shore Parallel Band
17
Lake Michigan Shore Parallel Band
18
Shore Parallel Bands Wind blows roughly parallel to major axis of lake
Air warms from heat flux from water creating a strong land-water air temperature contrast Land Breeze is created forcing a land breeze front and meso-beta scale convergence Meso-beta scale lifting of air to as high as 4 km AGL (compared to 1 km AGL for wind parallel bands) along land breeze front (s) Land breeze fronts usually combine into single convergence line Parallel to shoreline of lake Pushed to downwind shoreline when winds are not completely parallel to shoreline Down center of lake when winds are exactly parallel to shoreline of lake
19
Shore Parallel Bands Most intense snows of all the different lake-effect snow types, because: Concentrates all of the absorbed moisture and heat along a single narrow band Mesoscale lifting deepens the system to several kilometers allowing precipitation processes to be more efficient Colder than –20 C Deeper layer Bergeron – Findeisen Process Bands extend off shore and drop massive amounts of snow over small region Buffalo, NY (Lake Erie, WSW wind) Gary, Indiana (Lake Michigan, Northerly wind)
20
Wind or Shear Parallel Bands
Rayleigh Benard Instability Relatively shallow, i.e. depth of Boundary Layer So shallow, often can not form a viable precipitation process Long periods of light snow
21
Lake Michigan Wind/Shear Parallel Band
22
10 and 13 January, 1998
23
UW Volume Imaging Lidar at Lake-ICE
24
Characteristics of Wind Parallel vs. Shore Parallel Bands
25
Growth of Planetary Boundary Layer Across Lake
26
Visible Satellite Loop
Cloud rolls over water Spectacular Cloud streets over land Effect of lake shoreline Gravity waves perpendicular to flow 1704 UTC UTC
27
Detailed Study of Shore Parallel Bands
28
Sounding and Hodograph of Winds Incident on Western Shore
29
Rayleigh Numbers
31
Origins of Bands
32
Type “B” Waves
33
Wave Duct Leading to Type”B” Bands
34
Shore Parallel Bands Most intense snows of all the different lake-effect snow types, because: Concentrates all of the absorbed moisture and heat along a single narrow band Mesoscale lifting deepens the system to several kilometers allowing precipitation processes to be more efficient Colder than –20 C Deeper layer Bergeron – Findeisen Process Bands extend off shore and drop massive amounts of snow over small region Buffalo, NY (Lake Erie, WSW wind) Gary, Indiana (Lake Michigan, Northerly wind)
35
Predicting Wind Parallel Lake Effect Storms
Lake temperature minus 850 mb temperature >13C Wind fetch >100 km Wind speed moderate to high, i.e. >10 m/s
36
Predicting Shore Parallel Lake Effect Storms
Wind nearly parallel to long axis of lake Lake temperature minus 850 mb temperature >13C (can occur with less temperature contrast) Wind speed light to high, i.e. > 5 m/s
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.