Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

New competitive realities: How successful leaders respond

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "New competitive realities: How successful leaders respond"— Presentation transcript:

1 New competitive realities: How successful leaders respond
Athens, Greece Fall 2005 Dave Ulrich

2 Goals for today THINK: About new competitive realities that shape what leaders need to know and do BEHAVE: Do little things that make a difference FUN: Enjoy the experience together

3 Outline for the Session
5 competitive realities Competitiveness does not equal strategy, but strategy * organization Organization does not equal structure, but capability Capabilities are not defined by the giver, but the receiver through the value they create Leadership is not an event or person, but a brand HR practices, departments, and professionals must respond

4 1. Competitiveness is not just strategy, but strategy * organization
Formulation of strategy Unique position in industry Importance of clarity Focus on growth or costs Execution of strategy Simple is not easy Knowing is not doing

5 1. Competitiveness is not just strategy, but strategy * organization
Leader role: create a logic for strategic thinking that focuses on content (what is our strategy) and process (how we set our strategy) Vision: define where we are headed Goals: set targets and milestones Actions: create a menu of choices Follow up: measure, track, and communicate

6 1. Competitiveness is not just strategy, but strategy * organization

7 1. Competitiveness is not just strategy, but strategy * organization

8 2. Organization is not structure, but capability
Define an organization less by its hierarchy than by its capabilities Capabilities represent what the organization is known for and/or good at doing Capabilities turn strategy into action and sustained results (a pattern, not an event)

9 2. Organization does not equal structure, but capability
Individual Organizational Technical Individual Technical Abilities e.g., manufacturing, sales, finance, IT, marketing Organizational Technical Competencies e.g., marketing, manufacturing, finance Social Individual Social Abilities e.g., sharing information, making decisions, managing conflict, getting work done Organizational Social Capabilities e.g., talent, leadership, collaboration, efficiency,

10 2. Strategy/capability/action framework
CURRENT STATE FUTURE STATE 1 4 STRATEGY 2 5 CAPABILITY/ ORGANIZATION 3 6 ACTION RESULT

11 2. Organization does not equal structure, but capability
Possible Capabilities TALENT: Intellectual capital, know how, competencies, skills, commitment, workforce SPEED: Agility, adaptation, flexibility, cycle time, responsiveness SHARED MINDSET: Culture change, transformation, firm identity, firm equity, firm brand, shared agenda LEARNING: Knowledge management, sharing best practices, COLLABORTION: boundary-less, teamwork, sharing information INNOVATION: Administrative innovation, product creation, strategic innovation ACCOUNTABILITY: Performance, execution, implementation LEADERSHIP: Competencies, bench strength, quality of management, leadership brand STRATEGIC CLARITY: Shared competitive agenda, strategic priorities, shared point of view EFFICIENCY: Reengineering, reduce costs CUSTOMER SERVICE: Customer focused organization, customer centric or intimacy

12 2. Organization does not equal structure, but capability
Capability Audit Given our strategy, how important are each of the following capabilities? Importance (1= low; 7 = high) priority Talent: the ability to have people who are competent and committed and in the right jobs at the right time Speed: the ability to make change happen, fast --- to respond to market conditions quickly and adapt and adopt new programs Shared mindset: the ability to create or change a culture; to undergo transformation and change the identity of the firm; to shift the firm brand Learning: the ability to generate and generalize ideas with impact Collaboration: the ability to make the whole more than the sum of the parts through 1+1 = 3 or 1+1 = 1 (e.g., mergers, acquisitions) Innovation: the ability to try and do new things in strategy, product, and/or administrative process

13 2. Organization does not equal structure, but capability
Capability Audit (continued) Importance (1= low; 7 = high) priority Accountability: the ability to set and meet commitments on time and within budget Leadership: the ability to build a leadership brand of both attributes and results at all levels of the organization Strategic clarity: the ability to form a clear strategy for growth that is shared throughout the organization Efficiency: the ability to reduce costs Customer Service: the ability to serve targeted customers and gain customer share TOTAL: Reference: Capitalizing your capabilities, Harvard Business Review, June 2004

14 2. Organization does not equal structure, but capability
OUTCOME OF AN ORGANIZATION/HR AUDIT Defining and prioritizing the organization’s capabilities required for success Gaining alignment from key stakeholders about what organization is required to succeed Figuring out where to allocate resources to win

15 2. Organization does not equal structure, but capability
Leader’s role in capability building See strategy as three, not two steps Audit capabilities Create capability plans that turn strategy into action

16 2. Organization does not equal structure, but capability

17 2. Organization does not equal structure, but capability

18 3 Capabilities are defined by the receivers more than the givers
Capabilities come from the value they deliver to key stakeholders Value is defined by the receiver more than the giver

19 3. Capabilities are defined by the receivers more than the givers
Value is defined by the receiver more than the giver

20 3. Receivers of value that leaders create
Customer Share Employee competence and commitment Leaders Investor intangibles Line manager: Organization capabilities

21 3. Receivers of value that leaders create
Service External sensing Customer Share Talent Accountability Learning Quality of leadership Employee competence and commitment Leaders Investor intangibles Market value Speed Shared mindset Collaboration Innovation Strategic clarity Efficiency Line manager: Organization capabilities

22 3. Capabilities are defined by the receivers more than the givers
Leaders role in defining value Focus on value created more than activity Recognize that there are multiple stakeholders in determining value Manage the paradoxes of competing stakeholders

23 3. Capabilities are defined by the receivers more than the givers

24 4. Leadership is not an event or person, but brand
Define what leadership means Specify why leadership matters Lay out an agenda to be a branded leader or build a leadership brand

25 4. History of Leadership Theories
What’s next? 9 1,9 9:9 80’s/90’s Universal Principles 70’s/80’s Situational 1,1 9,1 Figure out what decade you are in based on your response to the last question. 50’s Great Man Leaders have certain physical and mental attributes 60’s One Best Way Leaders are theory X or theory Y; 9:9 managers 70’s Situational Leaders know when to be high task and when to be high collaborative 80’s & 90’s Universal Leaders follow certain key principles Principles Review 50’s draw a circle; 60’s: draw a matrix with task and people with dot in upper right; 70’s: draw a bell curve on the 60’s diagram; 80’s and 90’s: put a dot in the middle of the bell curve. Before doing 2000’s, ask, “what is common so far about leadership?” What is occupation of people who write theories about leadership? Blake and Mouton, Hertzberg, etc. psychologists What do psychologists write about: individual issues, motivation, etc. Show previous page responses: what decade is this list from? What’s next? 2000’s What’s next in leadership development? 60’s 1 9 One best way 40’s/50’s “Great Man” theory of leadership- mental/physical attributes

26 4. Leadership as a Brand 1. Product 2. Firm 3. Leadership
Insert Nestle logo Point out some product brands in the room; What’s average price difference between a generic and a brand? 30% Firm Brand: Dick has talked to you about this. Name companies that have external brand image consistent with internal culture? SW Airlines; Nordstrom’s etc. Culture that resonates with customers. Example: male who is wearing something from Nordstrom’s? who made the product? What’s it worth to have customers who have this kind of trust? Leadership Brand: leadership pipeline that builds investor and customer confidence in the future. All 3 levels have a common formula for strength of brand: Does this product/firm/leadership do what it promises to do AND how many people are aware of it. Efficacy X awareness. What company consistently gets high marks for strength of leadership brand? GE. Let’s look at what happens.

27 What the metaphor of leadership brand offers
4. Leadership as a Brand What the metaphor of leadership brand offers Brand focuses outside/in and the impact of leaders Brand puts leadership into business language Brand applies across all levels of leaders Brand is sustainable in the organization; not a person, but a leadership brand for all leaders Brand has efficacy; it has to be real or it does not last Brand adds value and focuses on value created Brand is unique and tied to strategy and not generic Brand evolves over time to meet needs of customers Brand turns firm brand into actionable choices and decisions Point out some product brands in the room; What’s average price difference between a generic and a brand? 30% Firm Brand: Dick has talked to you about this. Name companies that have external brand image consistent with internal culture? SW Airlines; Nordstrom’s etc. Culture that resonates with customers. Example: male who is wearing something from Nordstrom’s? who made the product? What’s it worth to have customers who have this kind of trust? Leadership Brand: leadership pipeline that builds investor and customer confidence in the future. All 3 levels have a common formula for strength of brand: Does this product/firm/leadership do what it promises to do AND how many people are aware of it. Efficacy X awareness. What company consistently gets high marks for strength of leadership brand? GE. Let’s look at what happens.

28 4. Leadership as a Brand Point out some product brands in the room; What’s average price difference between a generic and a brand? 30% Firm Brand: Dick has talked to you about this. Name companies that have external brand image consistent with internal culture? SW Airlines; Nordstrom’s etc. Culture that resonates with customers. Example: male who is wearing something from Nordstrom’s? who made the product? What’s it worth to have customers who have this kind of trust? Leadership Brand: leadership pipeline that builds investor and customer confidence in the future. All 3 levels have a common formula for strength of brand: Does this product/firm/leadership do what it promises to do AND how many people are aware of it. Efficacy X awareness. What company consistently gets high marks for strength of leadership brand? GE. Let’s look at what happens.

29 4. Leadership as a Brand Point out some product brands in the room; What’s average price difference between a generic and a brand? 30% Firm Brand: Dick has talked to you about this. Name companies that have external brand image consistent with internal culture? SW Airlines; Nordstrom’s etc. Culture that resonates with customers. Example: male who is wearing something from Nordstrom’s? who made the product? What’s it worth to have customers who have this kind of trust? Leadership Brand: leadership pipeline that builds investor and customer confidence in the future. All 3 levels have a common formula for strength of brand: Does this product/firm/leadership do what it promises to do AND how many people are aware of it. Efficacy X awareness. What company consistently gets high marks for strength of leadership brand? GE. Let’s look at what happens.

30 4. Leadership as a Brand Point out some product brands in the room; What’s average price difference between a generic and a brand? 30% Firm Brand: Dick has talked to you about this. Name companies that have external brand image consistent with internal culture? SW Airlines; Nordstrom’s etc. Culture that resonates with customers. Example: male who is wearing something from Nordstrom’s? who made the product? What’s it worth to have customers who have this kind of trust? Leadership Brand: leadership pipeline that builds investor and customer confidence in the future. All 3 levels have a common formula for strength of brand: Does this product/firm/leadership do what it promises to do AND how many people are aware of it. Efficacy X awareness. What company consistently gets high marks for strength of leadership brand? GE. Let’s look at what happens.

31 4. Leadership as a Brand Point out some product brands in the room; What’s average price difference between a generic and a brand? 30% Firm Brand: Dick has talked to you about this. Name companies that have external brand image consistent with internal culture? SW Airlines; Nordstrom’s etc. Culture that resonates with customers. Example: male who is wearing something from Nordstrom’s? who made the product? What’s it worth to have customers who have this kind of trust? Leadership Brand: leadership pipeline that builds investor and customer confidence in the future. All 3 levels have a common formula for strength of brand: Does this product/firm/leadership do what it promises to do AND how many people are aware of it. Efficacy X awareness. What company consistently gets high marks for strength of leadership brand? GE. Let’s look at what happens.

32 Leadership brand = higher stock price
Bob Nardelli Welch retires at GE. In contention for his job are Jeff Immeldt, Bob Nardelli and Jim McNurney. Immeldt gets job at GE. Nardelli goes to Home Depot and McNurny to 3M What happens to stock price? Recent article in Economist tells the story. Jack Welch Jim McNurney

33 “19 GE stars immediately added an astonishing $24
“19 GE stars immediately added an astonishing $24.5 billion to the share prices of the companies that hired them… with no change in GE’s share price..” Transition: How do you create leadership development process that has this impact?

34 4. Six Components to Be or Build the Leadership Brand
1. Compelling case for leadership Need Publicize Declare 2. Declare leadership needed for strategic results 6. Ensure reputation Leadership Brand Assess Measure 3. Assess leaders and leadership 5. Measure impact of investment Invest 4. Invest in leadership capability

35 Assessment of Leadership Brand (source www.rbl.net)
Score lo=1/hi=7 Priority Create a compelling case for leadership To what extent do we link quality of leadership to the performance of our business? 2. To what extent have we articulated a leadership value proposition for our company? 3. To what extent do we avoid leadership loss leaders (e.g., doing events rather than changing processes)? Craft a declaration of leadership 4. To what extent do we have a clear statement of the desired attributes of successful leaders in our company? 5. To what extent do we have a clear statement of the required results of successful leaders in our company? 6. To what extent have we declared a leadership brand that includes both attributes and results? Assess quality of leadership pipeline and leaders 7. To what extent do we have a process in place to identify the quality and quantity of our leadership pipeline? 8. To what extent do leaders receive feedback on their performance from multiple stakeholders?

36 Assessment of Leadership Brand (cont.)
Score lo=1/hi=7 Priority Invest in Leadership 9. To what extent do we offer educational experiences to help leaders develop? 10. To what extent do we offer developmental experiences to help leaders develop? 11. To what extent do leaders have an individual development plan for their development over the next 2 to 3 years? Measure impact of leadership investments 12. To what extent do we measure the impact of the leadership investments we make? 13. To what extent do our leaders deliver the results that our strategy suggests we should? Ensure awareness and reputation 14. To what extent do our leaders have a reputation that matches our strategy? TOTAL:

37 5: Changing HR role (HR is not just for HR)
Views of HR: HR practices People Performance Information Work HR department Strategy Structure HR professionals Roles Competencies Point out some product brands in the room; What’s average price difference between a generic and a brand? 30% Firm Brand: Dick has talked to you about this. Name companies that have external brand image consistent with internal culture? SW Airlines; Nordstrom’s etc. Culture that resonates with customers. Example: male who is wearing something from Nordstrom’s? who made the product? What’s it worth to have customers who have this kind of trust? Leadership Brand: leadership pipeline that builds investor and customer confidence in the future. All 3 levels have a common formula for strength of brand: Does this product/firm/leadership do what it promises to do AND how many people are aware of it. Efficacy X awareness. What company consistently gets high marks for strength of leadership brand? GE. Let’s look at what happens.

38 5: Changing HR role (HR is not just for HR)
Invest in people practices People = competence * commitment Competence: assessment and investment Commitment: engagement and productivity

39 Competence Investment
Given competencies required for the future, how will we assure them? Insert 5 B’s tool Step 1: how well are we doing on each of these? On this list, what 2 items could we do from each of these?

40 Commitment Investment
Sources of commitment Information: legitimate, credible, consistent Behave as if: Engagement, participation Reinforcement Financial, non-financial Given competencies required for the future, how will we assure them? Insert 5 B’s tool Step 1: how well are we doing on each of these? On this list, what 2 items could we do from each of these?

41 5: Changing HR role (HR is not just for HR)

42 5: Changing HR role (HR is not just for HR)
Invest in performance practices Setting standards Allocating rewards (financial and non-financial) Providing follow up and feedback

43 5: Changing HR role (HR is not just for HR)

44 5: Changing HR role (HR is not just for HR)
Invest in information practices Communication strategy Information transmission

45 5: Changing HR role

46 5: Changing HR role (HR is not just for HR)

47 5: Changing HR role (HR is not just for HR)
Invest in work practices Who does the work? (organization structure, reporting relationships) How is the work done? (teams, work processes) Where is the work done? (work space)

48 5: Changing HR role (HR is not just for HR)

49 5 Assuring HR professionalism: (HR roles,)
Play the right HR roles Strategic partner Change agent Administrative expert Employee champion Functional expert Employee advocate HR * LEADER Strategic partner Human capital developer


Download ppt "New competitive realities: How successful leaders respond"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google