1. LAMP Project work 2015/16 An overview
Betsy Scott RMN, Msc, FHEA
LAMP Project Lead

2. LAMP Project work 2015/16: An overview
‘Shape of caring review’ would continue to make preceptorship an important component of professional development.
An opportunity to take stock of where our respective Trust were with our own programmes
An opportunity to identify areas of excellent practice, to benchmark to
Comparative Study of the uptake of the HENCEL preceptorship standards across London
Comparative study of the preceptorship programmes across London

3. London Preceptorship: an overview
Management
Support for preceptees
Evaluation and Quality Improvement

4. Methodology
Questionnaires
Focus groups
7 out of 9 Trusts responded

5. Management All London Trusts ran a preceptorship Programme
All were Nursing focused
Workbook
Workshop programme
Named lead
Line managers informed the named lead
Database of preceptees
One Trust ran a module for preceptors
Trusts & HEI’s – Workshop programme
Mentors

6. Support of Preceptees Named preceptor
Team approach vs individual support
Protected time for preceptor
Protected time to attend workshops
Training Needs analysis
Appraisal
Emotional Resilience

7. Workshop themes Medicines Management Accountability Career Development
Managing conflict
Delivering safe care +
Physical Health/ Diabetes/Clozapine Management/ Escalating physical health concerns
Emotional Intelligence
Leadership
Quality improvement
Reflection
Safe Staffing
Raising concerns
Team Working
Medicines Management
Values
Communication
Therapeutic Boundaries
Assessment, interventions and care planning
Common blood results
Risk assessment & Management
Managing emergencies & Crisis situations
Mental Health Act / Capacity Act
Delegating to junior staff
Delivering CQUIN targets
Financial aspects of commissioning

8. Evaluation and Quality Improvement
Questionnaires
Structured programme – Executive Nurse
Board Level
Aligned to the organisations appraisal framework
Commitment to the 6c’s
Preceptees contributed to the development of future programmes
Workshops were evaluated
Career paths beyond preceptorship
Cost of programmes
Preceptors
Mentors
Quality Improvement:
No Standardised evaluation tool
Some formal standardisation across London
More collaboration across Trusts
Board level
Cost of programmes
Preceptors involvement in future development
Role of the Mentor
Career paths beyond preceptorship
Training needs analysis – Appraisal
Thematic analysis – Feedback loops – Training Teams – HEI’s
Mentors informing Simulated practice Curriculums
More partnership working between HEI’s and Trusts
Leads given time and support

9. Conclusion Safe landing Time to step back and breathe
Preceptorship leads should continue to meet