Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The S-121 Maritime Limits and Boundaries Standard

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "The S-121 Maritime Limits and Boundaries Standard"— Presentation transcript:

1 The S-121 Maritime Limits and Boundaries Standard
A Status Report Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee (HSSC 9) November 6-10th, Ottawa, Canada S121PT

2 Point of Origin Developed as part of a request from the UN Division for Oceans and Law of the Sea (DOALOS) to enable member States to meet their obligation to depositing their maritime limits and boundaries.  IHO S-121 describes how to encode and exchange digital maritime limits and boundaries, and the associated juridical zones as described under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).  The specification was developed as part of a request from the UN Division for Oceans and Law of the Sea (DOALOS), and enables member States to meet their obligation to depositing their maritime limits and boundaries.  Under UNCLOS States are able to deposit their Maritime Limits and Boundaries using either charts or lists of coordinates so S-121 requires encodings which can support differing member State requirements using an accessible and comprehensive format.  As it stands the S121 project team has built a data model that can feed three main use cases (1)        Support for the deposit of member states Maritime Limits and Boundaries to DOALOS (a human-computer readable format). (2)        Support for exchange of maritime limits and boundaries data between member states. (3)        Support for production of charts for use in S-101 and S-57 navigation system.  The project team in the last year 9 months has consolidated and agreed on the core features of the model. The model was refined following a comprehensive review in May The current version of the model will be exposed for discussion in the upcoming meeting (20th-21st September 2017) to address both the core feature attributes and the remaining part of the standard which provides the integration with ISO This allows for the administration Party, Roles, Rights, Restrictions, Responsibilities associated with Maritime Limits and Boundaries.  With the recent changes and increased interest in the standard, a website ( was built to raise awareness, improve communications and facilitate access to the current advancements made by the project team. As of September 2017, the team has:   Built the conceptual model An example case of an data model implementation The immediate priorities are to:  Agree the latest iteration of the model with all stakeholders Refining the deposit exchange format. More work will have to be done in creating and refining the exchange formats in the next few months Begin discussions on symbology for all use cases. Consider metadata and exchange set creation Start testbed creation with 3rd party software vendors and suppliers. It is hoped that shortly after the next meeting in December that the standard will reach a significant milestone allowing it to enter a pilot stage. This will be in conjunction with the OGC and will involve participation by industry participants as well as member States in a test bed project. It is expected that shortly after the meeting in December, that the S121PT will be able to produce further recommendations and submissions to the S100WG. S121PT

3 Mandate Support the management and exchange of a State’s Maritime Sovereignty, Sovereign rights extents and associated juridical zones as described under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).  The mandate stems from UN General Assembly resolutions requesting the Secretary-General to improve the existing geographic information system for the deposit by States of charts and geographical coordinates concerning maritime zones, including lines of delimitation in particular by implementing, in co-operation with relevant international organizations technical standards for the collection, storage and dissemination of the information deposited, in order to ensure compatibility among the Geographic Information System, electronic nautical charts and other systems developed by these organizations. Picture: S121PT

4 Terms of Reference S-121 MLBs Project team was tasked to:
Define a proposed data model; Create an S-100 conformant product specification for MLBs to support coastal States’ depository obligations in accordance with the Convention; Determine if S-100 needs to be extended to facilitate the implementation of the deposit obligation of coastal States’ under the Convention. The terms of references initially presented at the first S121 Project Team meeting were refined to better match the mandate. Picture: S121PT

5 The S-121 MLBs Standard Structure
Based on two levels which follows the basic premise of ISO TC211 of the separation of the “carrier from the content”. Administer, manage and maintain MLBs Data Model Distribute and make MLBs accessible Exchange formats Separate the carrier from the content. Where the carrier is the exchange format and the content been the administered information is quite only logical. For example, before producing a financial report, incomes and expenditures are to be gathered and logically organized. Thus before exchanging MLBs, a State administer, manage and maintain the MLBs in some form of data model. The S-121 data model is by all means not meant to be prescriptive, but instead it aims to be as open as possible. The data model, is really what hold the most information about the MLBs, whereas exchange formats may be only representing a subset of the information found in the data model, a subset extracted and formatted in such a way to fit specific purposes or use cases. S121PT

6 50 Members representing:
Participation 50 Members representing: 13 Member States 9 active 6 International Body Members, Liaison and Bodies of Interest UN-DOALOS, ABLOS, IHB ISO TC211, INSPIRE UN-GGIM 6 Observing Industry Members S121PT

7 WWW.S-121.COM Development Status
In the last year 10 months the S121PT: Consolidated and agreed on the core features of the model (Dec. 2016). Refined the model following a comprehensive review (May 2017). Discussed core feature attributes and the integration of the ISO19152 standard describing the Party, Roles, Rights, Restrictions, Responsibilities associated with Maritime Limits and Boundaries. (Sept. 2017). Two member States have shown their interest in using the standard to deposit their limits in the near term. (Sept. 2017). Presented and published the new communication strategy (Sept. 2017). The project team in the last year 9 months has consolidated and agreed on the core features of the model. The model was refined following a comprehensive review in May The current version of the model will be exposed for discussion in the upcoming meeting (20th-21st September 2017) to address both the core feature attributes and the remaining part of the standard which provides the integration with ISO This allows for the administration Party, Roles, Rights, Restrictions, Responsibilities associated with Maritime Limits and Boundaries.  With the recent changes and increased interest in the standard, a website ( was built to raise awareness, improve communications and facilitate access to the current advancements made by the project team. As of September 2017, the team has:   Built the conceptual model An example case of an data model implementation The immediate priorities are to:  Agree the latest iteration of the model with all stakeholders Refining the deposit exchange format. More work will have to be done in creating and refining the exchange formats in the next few months Begin discussions on symbology for all use cases. Consider metadata and exchange set creation Start testbed creation with 3rd party software vendors and suppliers. It is hoped that shortly after the next meeting in December that the standard will reach a significant milestone allowing it to enter a pilot stage. This will be in conjunction with the OGC and will involve participation by industry participants as well as member States in a test bed project. It is expected that shortly after the meeting in December, that the S121PT will be able to produce further recommendations and submissions to the S100WG. S121PT

8 Currently Have: Functional Conceptual and Implementation model available online (HTML and EA files) Informative documentation (Cover page, Draft Overview) Draft Product Specification compliant with S-100 template Draft Encoding document Additional information (papers, info letter and presentations) Implementation Guidelines for ArcGIS and QGIS (this week) Hypothetic and real life implementation example (this week) Under UNCLOS States are able to deposit their Maritime Limits and Boundaries using either charts or lists of coordinates so S-121 requires encodings which can support differing member State requirements using an accessible and comprehensive format.  As it stands the S121 project team has built a data model that can feed three main use cases (1)        Support for the deposit of member states Maritime Limits and Boundaries to DOALOS (a human-computer readable format). (2)        Support for exchange of maritime limits and boundaries data between member states. (3)        Support for production of charts for use in S-101 and S-57 navigation system.  The project team in the last year 9 months has consolidated and agreed on the core features of the model. The model was refined following a comprehensive review in May The current version of the model will be exposed for discussion in the upcoming meeting (20th-21st September 2017) to address both the core feature attributes and the remaining part of the standard which provides the integration with ISO This allows for the administration Party, Roles, Rights, Restrictions, Responsibilities associated with Maritime Limits and Boundaries.  With the recent changes and increased interest in the standard, a website ( was built to raise awareness, improve communications and facilitate access to the current advancements made by the project team. As of September 2017, the team has:   Built the conceptual model An example case of an data model implementation The immediate priorities are to:  Agree the latest iteration of the model with all stakeholders Refining the deposit exchange format. More work will have to be done in creating and refining the exchange formats in the next few months Begin discussions on symbology for all use cases. Consider metadata and exchange set creation Start testbed creation with 3rd party software vendors and suppliers. It is hoped that shortly after the next meeting in December that the standard will reach a significant milestone allowing it to enter a pilot stage. This will be in conjunction with the OGC and will involve participation by industry participants as well as member States in a test bed project. It is expected that shortly after the meeting in December, that the S121PT will be able to produce further recommendations and submissions to the S100WG. S121PT

9 Next Priorities Support the members in their implementation efforts (Nov. 2017). Provide and update guidance document as needed. (Nov. 2017). Refining the deposit exchange format. (Dec. 2017). Ready a draft a pilot project proposal with the OGC a strategy to actively involve 3rd party software vendors and suppliers. (Dec. 2017). Revise documentation (Dec. 2017). S121PT

10 Next Meeting Objectives
United Nation Headquarters, New York, Dec. 4-8th 2017 Receive and discuss the member implementation Fine tune the model with all stakeholders Begin discussions on symbology for all use cases. Consider metadata and exchange set creation Reach an agreement on the OGC pilot strategy S121PT

11 Expectations It is hoped that shortly after the next meeting in December that the standard will reach a significant milestone allowing it to enter a pilot stage. This will be in conjunction with the OGC and will involve participation by industry participants as well as member States in a test bed project. It is expected that shortly after the meeting in December, that the S121PT will be able to produce further recommendations and submissions to the S100WG. S121PT

12 Challenges INTEGRATION SCOPE ADMINISTRATION
ISO and S-100 have nomenclature differences. S-100 Dictionary not supporting multiple definitions for a single entry, forcing the creation of unwanted complex attribute and object names. SCOPE MLBs are the foundation delimiting the marine juridical domain. Sensible issue dear to the Member States. The integration of ISO makes the standard expendable to other usages such internal management, marine cadaster, fisheries. ADMINISTRATION First S-100 standard organising the information objects to support administration and legal description. Separates the carrier (exchange format) from the content (administered data). Challenges Links: Images

13 Questions: Picture: S121PT


Download ppt "The S-121 Maritime Limits and Boundaries Standard"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google