1. Volume 67, Issue 3, Pages 569-576 (March 2015)
Multifocality and Prostate Cancer Detection by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Correlation with Whole-mount Histopathology 
Jesse D. Le, Nelly Tan, Eugene Shkolyar, David Y. Lu, Lorna Kwan, Leonard S. Marks, Jiaoti Huang, Daniel J.A. Margolis, Steven S. Raman, Robert E. Reiter 
European Urology 
Volume 67, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
DOI: /j.eururo
Copyright © Terms and Conditions

2. Fig. 1
Results for a 62-yr-old male with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (biopsy Gleason score 4+3, prostate-specific antigen 11 ng/ml) and two high-suspicion regions of interest (image grade 4/5) at the mid-gland on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed with (A) T2-weighted imaging, (B) dynamic contrast-enhanced, and (C) diffusion-weighted imaging. (D) Both the left-sided index tumor (Gleason 3+4) and right-sided tumor (Gleason 3+3) observed on radical prostatectomy were detected by MRI; two additional small foci of Gleason 3+3 were missed.
European Urology  , DOI: ( /j.eururo )
Copyright © Terms and Conditions

3. Fig. 2
Rate of tumors detected and missed by multiparametric MRI, as stratified by maximal tumor diameter, Gleason score, index status, and tumor focality for all unique tumor foci (n=283). The index tumor is that with the highest Gleason score; if multiple foci had the same grade, the largest was considered the index lesion.
European Urology  , DOI: ( /j.eururo )
Copyright © Terms and Conditions

4. Fig. 3
Rate of tumors detected and missed by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, as stratified by maximal tumor diameter, Gleason score, and index status for solitary tumors (n=44, top) and multifocal tumors (n=239, bottom).
European Urology  , DOI: ( /j.eururo )
Copyright © Terms and Conditions