Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

By Lewis Dijkstra, PhD Deputy Head of the Economic Analysis Unit,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "By Lewis Dijkstra, PhD Deputy Head of the Economic Analysis Unit,"— Presentation transcript:

1 How the science of cities can help European policy makers: new analysis and perspectives
By Lewis Dijkstra, PhD Deputy Head of the Economic Analysis Unit, DG Regional and Urban Policy European Commission 1

2 Overview Data revolution Defining cities
New analysis and links to the urban sustainable development goal indicators Density Land use changes Green space Public transport

3 A data revolution More micro data (population register, business register, patents) More geo-coded data (building register, census…) More remote sensing data (water, green, imperviousness, buildings…) More big data (smart phones, geotagged pictures, messages…)

4 Copernicus Urban Atlas
Thematic classes based on CORINE Land Cover nomenclature But more specific for built-up areas, and less specific outside urban areas Geometric resolution of 1:10,000 Minimum mapping unit of 0.25 ha in urban areas, 1 ha in other areas Imagery reference year: 2006 and 2012

5 CORINE Land Cover

6 Urban Atlas

7 Sealed Surface Layer 22 November, 2018

8 GHSL 22 November, 2018

9 What makes a city? Buildings, mass, proximity People, density, size
Exchange, intensity, distance Functions, specialised, variety Political Economically linked Labour market, commuting zone

10 Population distribution within a city
To find out IF a municipality contains a city To define an 'urban centre' To measure access to transport, green space… To measure weighted density instead of average density To measure exposure to air quality

11 Urban centre versus administrative city

12 EU-OECD city and commuting zone definition in three steps
Define an urban centre of or more Define a city based on this urban centre (consisting of one or more municipalities) Define a commuting zone based on this city (including check for polycentric cities) IMPORTANT! Cities are selected based on the population of their centre, not total population

13 One, two, three

14 Three grid concepts Urban centres = contiguous (excluding diagonals) cells with a density of at least inhab/km2 and a minimum of inhabitants (after gaps filled with majority rule) Urban clusters = contiguous (including diagonals) cells with a density of at least 300 inhab/km2 and a minimum of inhabitants (no gap filling) Rural grid cells = cells outside urban clusters

15 Three degrees of urbanisation
Three grid concepts (Cork, IE) Three types of municipalities

16 Three types of municipalities
Cities > 50% pop. in urban centres Towns and suburbs > 50% pop. in urban clusters < 50% pop. in urban centres Rural area > 50% pop. in rural grid cells Urban areas = Cities + Towns and Suburbs

17 Density drops away from the centre

18 Share of built-up area drops away from the centre

19 Share of built-up area drops away from the centre (cumulative)

20 Density or land use indicators
Target 11.b holistic disaster risk management Population density measured over continuous urban footprint Target 11.3 sustainable urbanization (& 11.a) Ratio of land consumption rate to population growth rate at comparable scale Problems Urban footprint or building footprint What is land consumption? What scale?

21 Proposal land use efficiency indicator
Measure built-up area (building footprint) per inhabitant based on GHSL for Cities following the EU-OECD definition and Commuting zone (if commuting is available) or Suburbs following degree of urbanisation or A buffer based on population size of a city Monitor the changes in built-up area per capita over time (land use efficiency) Cities with a high efficiency can reduce it, cities with low efficiency should increase it.

22

23 Measuring access to public transport: input data
Location of all public transport stops Timetables of services: 2 groups: bus and tram train and metro Population per building block based on: detailed population grids census tracts neighbourhood statistics plus disaggregation using land use data and/or imperviousness if needed

24 Spatial distribution of population matters
No location awareness: assuming uniform population density throughout the city High-resolution spatial distribution of population: Opportunities for new indicators

25 Frequency of departures
Average stops an hour from 6:00 to 20:00 on a normal week day Very high More than ten departures an hour for both medium- and high-speed modes High More than ten departures an hour for one mode, but not both Medium Between four and ten departures an hour on one or both modes, but no access to more than ten departures and hour Low less than four departures an hour for one or both modes, but no access to more than four departures an hour Null No access within walking distance

26 Typology of frequency classes
Very high Access to more than ten departures an hour for both medium- and high-speed modes High Access to more than ten departures an hour for one mode, but not both Medium Access to between four and ten departures an hour on one or both modes, but no access to more than ten departures and hour Low less than four departures an hour for one or both modes, but no access to more than four departures an hour Null No access within walking distance

27 Stockholm: areas and population by access to public transport and its frequency
844, ,135, ,542, ,042,000 inh inh inh inh.

28 Access to public transport in Brussels

29 Target 11.2 Public transport
Share of people living within 0.5 km of public transit [running at least every 20 minutes] in cities with more than 500,000 inhabitants Specify the city definition to be used Km of high capacity (BRT, light rail, metro) public transport per person for cities with more than 500,000 inhabitants Why not measure access to high capacity public transport?

30

31 Green spaces in Brussels, 2012

32 Access to green spaces by size

33 Target 11.7 Green and public space
Area of public space as a % of total city space Share of residents within 0.5 km of accessible green and public space Accessible is extremely difficult to determine Public space: roads, sidewalks, squares? Proposal: share of residents with Almost no open space in a buffer of 0.5 km No green space of at least x m2 within 0.5 km This avoids the problem of measuring access, but it will be a subset of the population with no access

34 Conclusion Data revolution is in full swing, but we need
a universe of cities using a single methodology Understand population distribution within cities Be aware of the modifiable area unit problem: Use uniform building blocks (like grid cells) Use population with access rather than area share When using area shares, use a grid definition, not an administrative one Take full advantage of new continuous, high resolution data sets (vs coarse and binary data)

35 More information EU-OECD City definition
New degree of urbanisation


Download ppt "By Lewis Dijkstra, PhD Deputy Head of the Economic Analysis Unit,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google