1. The Use of the Analytic Hierarchy Process to Aid Decision Making in Acquired Equinovarus Deformity 
Janine A. van Til, MSc, Gerbert J. Renzenbrink, MD, James G. Dolan, MD, Maarten J. IJzerman, PhD 
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 
Volume 89, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
DOI: /j.apmr
Copyright © 2008 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

2. Fig 1
The AHP decision model. Impact of treatment comprises the impact to the patient in the active treatment phase, and daily effort comprises the daily actions needed to maintain the effect of treatment afterward (mainly donning and doffing necessary equipment). *Criteria supported by literature.26
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2008 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

3. Fig 2
Patient case description. Observations were based on extensive manual testing in lying and sitting positions and visual observation of the patient during walking by an experienced physiotherapist. Abbreviations: FAC, Functional Ambulation Category; MRC, Medical Research Council scale.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2008 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

4. Fig 3
The average performance values with standard deviation of the treatments on all level 3 criteria. IFES, implanted peroneal stimulator; SFES, surface peroneal stimulator; SOS, semi-orthopedic shoes; TS, soft-tissue surgery.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2008 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

5. Fig 4
Sensitivity analysis. A 6-dimensional space is presented by showing each combination of weights for 2 criteria in 16 squares. If the preference for treatment is dependent on the weight of other criteria, multiple treatment priorities are piled for a 2-dimensional weight combination.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2008 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions