Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Radiotherapy for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Radiotherapy for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression"— Presentation transcript:

1 Radiotherapy for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression
Dirk Rades, MD Professor and Chair Department of Radiation Oncology University of Lübeck, Germany

2 Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression
MSCC in 5-10% of all cancer patients most common primaries: Breast-Ca (~25%) Prostate-Ca (~20%) Lung-Ca (~20%) Myeloma (10-15%) Renal Cell Cancer (~10%) Localization: cervical <10% thoracic 60-80% lumbar 15-30% Prasad et al. Lancet Oncol 2005 Lesion of dorsal elements Lesion of vertebra

3 “True“ MSCC = Motor Deficits
=> Poor Survival Prognosis Year N pts. Median OS (mos.) Sorensen et al Helweg-Larsen et al Rades et al Hoskin et al Maranzano et al Overall Treatment Time ?

4 Evaluation of five radiation schedules and prognostic factors for MSCC
in a series of 1,304 patients Schedule Time N Pts. 1 x 8 Gy 1 day 261 5 x 4 Gy 1 week 279 10 x 3 Gy 2 weeks 274 15 x 2.5 Gy 3 weeks 233 20 x 2 Gy 4 weeks 257 Rades et al., JCO 2005

5 Improvement of Motor Deficits

6 Particularly important for long-term survivors !
SCORE-1: Long-course (10x3 Gy, 15x2.5 Gy, 20x2 Gy) vs. Short-course RT (1x8 Gy, 5x4 Gy) Particularly important for long-term survivors ! Rades et al., ASCO IJROPB 2011

7 Survival-Score (N=1,852) Rades et al., Cancer 2008
at 6 months (%) Score Type of primary tumor Breast cancer Prostate cancer Myeloma/lymphoma Lung cancer Other tumors 78 66 85 25 40 8 7 9 3 4 Other bone metastases Yes No 48 65 5 Visceral metastases 17 80 2 Interval tumor diagnosis to MSCC 15 months >15 months 41 71 Ambulatory status Ambulatory Non-ambulatory 31 Time of developing motor deficits 1-7 days 8-14 days >14 days 26 55 6 Rades et al., Cancer 2008

8 5x4 Gy vs. 10x3 Gy (randomized SCORE 2 - Trial)
Rades et al., JCO 2016

9 5x4 Gy vs. 10x3 Gy (randomized SCORE 2 - Trial)
Rades et al., JCO 2016

10 Matched-Pairs (N=242): 1x8 Gy vs. 5x4 Gy (≤35 points)
Rades et al., IJROBP 2015

11 Matched-Pairs (N=410): 1x8 Gy vs. 5x4 Gy (all patients)
Matched-Pair Analysis (1:1): (age, gender, ECOG, tumor, N vertebrae, bone mets, visc. mets, interval FD-MSCC, ambulatory st., time developing motor deficits) Local Control of MSCC Overall Survival Rades et al., unpublished

12 In addition to RT: Corticosteroids
Effective ? => Yes Appropriate Dose ??

13 SCORE-1 Study: Bisphosphonates
Rades et al., IJROBP 2011

14 In addition to RT: Decompressive Surgery
surgery plus 10 x 3 Gy (N=50) vs. 10 x 3 Gy alone (N=51) ability to walk after treatment: 42/50 (84%) vs. 29/51 (57%) p=0.001 maintaining ambulatory status: median 122 vs. 13 days p=0.003 overall survival: median 4.2 vs. 3.3 months p=0.033 Surgery only for selected patients (10-15%): KPS  70, OS  3 mos., no paraplegia > 48 hrs., 1 spinal segment, no myeloma 10 years to accrue (not all eligible patients included ?) 10% more ambulatory patients than in other series small number of patients (statistical power ?) surgery-related complications: primary 12%; salvage 40% Patchell et al., Lancet 2005

15 Surgery + RT vs. RT alone [N=324] Matched-Pair Analysis (1:2):
(age, gender, ECOG, tumor, N vertebrae, bone mets, visc. mets, interval FD-MSCC, ambulatory, time developing motor deficits, RT) S + RT RT alone P better motor function 27% 26% 1-year local control 90% 91% 1-year survival 47% 40% Rades et al., JCO, 2010

16 Recurrence after Short-course RT
Re-RT for MSCC (appears safe, if BED120 Gy2) Rades et al., IJROBP 2005, CANCER 2008

17 Recurrence after Long-course RT Surgery, if possible and indicated

18 Recurrence after Long-course RT
- if Surgery is not possible - Re-RT ? => high precision RT Also an Option for Less Radiosensitive Tumors ?

19 Less Radiosensitive Tumors
Dose Escalation Rades et al., IJROBP, 2011

20 Less Radiosensitive Tumors: RS/SBRT

21 RS/SBRT: Late Toxicity - Vertebral Fractures
Yamada, IJROBP 2008 N=93 IG-IMRT 1 x 24 ( ) Gy 2% (EQD2 = 82 – 141 Gy) Rose, JCO 2009 N=62 IG-IMRT 1 x 24 ( ) Gy 39% Garg, Cancer 2012 N=61 RS 1 x Gy 21% (EQD2 = 66 – 141 Gy) Jawad, JNS 2016 N=594 RS/SBRT median 1 x 20 Gy 6% (EQD2 = 100 Gy) Chang, Spine 2016 review of 38 studies 14%

22 RS / SBRT: Spinal Cord Tolerance
RTOG 06-31: Dose Constraints for SF-RS: Spinal cord 5-6 mm cranial / caudal to target: 10% < 10 Gy 0.35 ml < 10 Gy 0.035 ml < 14 Gy Cauda equina: 5 ml < 14 Gy 0.035 ml < 16 Gy Sahgal et al., IJROBP 2010: 1 x 10 Gy (EQD2: 30 Gy) = safe Kirkpatrick et al., IJROBP 2010: 1 x 13 Gy (EQD2: 49 Gy) 3 x 6.7 Gy (EQD2: 43 Gy) risk of myelopathy <1%

23 (multidisciplinary evaluation)
MSCC (multidisciplinary evaluation) surgery indicated and possible Surgery not indicated / not possible intermediate radiosensitivity very radiosensitive tumors (lymphoma, myeloma, germ cell tumors) less radiosensitive tumors SBRT ? (studies) prognosis ≤2 months prognosis 3-6 months prognosis >6 months systemic therapy? surgery + long-course RT [Corticosteroids, Bisphosphonates] SBRT [Corticost., Bisphosph.] Single Fraction [Corticosteroids] or BSC Short-course RT [Corticosteroids] Long-course RT [Corticosteroids, Bisphosphonates] Patients with MSCC require an individual (personalized) treatment approach !

24 Thank You Very Much for your Attention and Best Regards from Lübeck !


Download ppt "Radiotherapy for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google