Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Comparative Advantage & International Trade Lecture 4

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Comparative Advantage & International Trade Lecture 4"— Presentation transcript:

1 Comparative Advantage & International Trade Lecture 4
The PPF Comparative Advantage & International Trade Lecture 4 Dr. Jennifer P. Wissink ©2018 John M. Abowd and Jennifer P. Wissink, all rights reserved. September 4, 2018

2 Announcements-MACRO Fall 2018
Second Graded MEL quiz for “600 points” due at 11pm Thursday night. Get ‘er done! And submitted. For each quiz: You can check answers using Results after the quiz is past due. If you have any issues with your i>clicker remote or your REEF Polling app, please stop in to the Academic Technology Center, 123 Computing & Communications Center building (on the Ag Quad, near Bailey Hall), between 9:00am – 5:00pm, Monday – Friday. I will be around all this afternoon from 1:15pm-4:00pm so stop by if you need to. TA office hour grid is now posted. Check it out.

3 Cornell Transitions Project – Please Help!
The research: investigating the transition between high school and college The team: led by faculty member Michelle Smith The ask: your instructor will send you a link to a 10 minute survey. Please fill it out before 11:59 PM Friday September 7. Thank you: this survey is voluntary, and your participation will help us with the goal of improving educational support for undergraduates. The Carrot: Each and every student in the class will receive 30 MEL points at the end of the semester if 75% of the enrolled students participate. The link:

4 The PPF: Measuring Total and Marginal Opportunity Cost
Butter lbs. Guns tons 40 39 1 37 2 30 3 21 4 5 4

5 The PPF: Seeing Total and Marginal Opportunity Cost

6 Increasing MOC: So Why The Bowed-Out PPF Curve?
Two-fold answer: (1) Heterogeneous factors of production (2) The “Law of Diminishing Marginal Returns” (LDMR): As you add more and more of a variable factor to some activity, in the presence of a fixed factor, the marginal contribution of the variable factor will eventually decline.

7 Checking For The LDMR: Look At Marginal Product of Inputs
The “Law of Diminishing Marginal Returns” (LDMR): As you add more and more of a variable factor to some activity, in the presence of a fixed factor, the marginal contribution of the variable factor will eventually decline Consider the marginal product of labor in each technology. Marginal product of labor in making output “O” = MPLO MPLO = (change in output O) / (change in Labor) MPLO = (ΔO) / (ΔL) So consider the Marginal Product of Labor in Guns the Marginal Product of Labor in Butter

8 Checking For The LDMR In Guns & Butter
MPLG 2 1 3 4 5 production function for Guns MPLG BUTTER K L Butter MPLB 1 21 2 30 3 37 4 39 5 40 production function for Butter MPLB

9 So to Review… Heterogeneous factors of production and/or
The “Law of Diminishing Marginal Returns” (LDMR) imply increasing marginal opportunity costs, that is to say, a “bowed-out” PPF B PPF G

10 The LDMR & “The Dismal Science”
Thomas Malthus & David Ricardo English 19th century economists Worried about fixed supply of land, LDMR, increasing population and their inability to feed themselves. Why Economics Is Really Called 'the Dismal Science‘ (Thomas Carlyle) Where did they go wrong?

11 Location of the PPF & PPF Gymnastics
Suppose we have growth via… new technology, science, innovation R&D increases in labor productivity increases in kapital productivity investments in human and economic kapital newly found/acquired resources What happens to the PPF? B PPF-old PPF-new G

12 i>clicker question
Suppose Country Alpha is efficiently making both Guns and Butter. Suppose there is a technological innovation in the butter sector. Which one of the following is true? The economy can make more guns, but not more butter as compared to before. The economy can make more butter, but not more guns as compared to before. The economy is inside its PPF and will move to a point on its PPF. The economy can make more guns and more butter as compared to before. The economy has to make more guns and more butter as compared to before. B PPF-new PPF-old G

13 The PPF & MOC Applied to International Trade
Very nice application of PPF. Nice way to introduce the ideas of absolute advantage and comparative advantage. David Ricardo, again. Some consider him the grandfather of international trade theory. Very influential in pioneering the theory of comparative advantage, inter alia. Very interesting, very bright guy. Had a lot of say about the “corn laws” in England…, and more. 13

14 The Idea Of Comparative Advantage & Trade
Specialization and free trade will benefit all trading parties, even when some are “absolutely” more efficient producers than others. Need to understand absolute vs. comparative advantage. Paul Samuelson on CA, “…the best example he knows of an economic principle that is undeniably true yet not obvious to intelligent people.” Paul A. Samuelson, Economist, Dies at 94 (NYTimes obit):

15 Absolute vs. Comparative Advantage
Absolute advantage: if your country uses fewer resources to produce a given unit of output than the other country. Comparative advantage: if your country can produce an output at a lower marginal cost in terms of other goods foregone than the other country. Every country (or person, or economy) has a comparative advantage at some activity. Absolute advantage is not important and may not always happen. Sometimes people or countries have the absolute advantage in nothing! Yet trade possibilities still exist. It’s all about comparative advantage.

16 i>clicker question
Suppose this production information for England and Portugal. Assume they can make as many units of cloth and wine as they have hours of labor for. Labor can be divided in any way between cloth and wine within the country. Labor cannot move between the countries. Given the table, who has the absolute advantage in wine? England Portugal Both England and Portugal Neither Not enough information to know LABOR (L) HOURS REQUIRED ENGLAND PORTUGAL 1 yd. cloth 2 hours 1 hour 1 barrel wine 40 hours 10 hours

17 i>clicker question
Suppose this production information for England and Portugal. Assume they can make as many units of cloth and wine as they have hours of labor for. Labor can be divided in any way between cloth and wine within the country. Labor cannot move between the countries. Given the table, who has the comparative advantage in wine? England Portugal Both England and Portugal Neither Not enough information to know LABOR (L) HOURS REQUIRED ENGLAND PORTUGAL 1 yd. cloth 2 hours 1 hour 1 barrel wine 40 hours 10 hours

18 Each Country’s PPF Assume L=80 hours in England.
LABOR HRS REQUIRED ENGLAND PORTUGAL 1 yd. cloth 2 hours 1 hour 1 barrel wine 40 hours 10 hours Each Country’s PPF Assume L=80 hours in England. Assume L=80 hours in Portugal. England’s PPF Portugal’s PPF

19 The Combined PPF W W England’s PPF 8 Portugal’s PPF 2 40 80 C C


Download ppt "Comparative Advantage & International Trade Lecture 4"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google