1. PHIL 2525 Contemporary Moral Issues
Lec 5
Chapter 3: Subjectivism
PHIL 2525 Contemporary Moral Issues

2. Protagoras: Agnostic
"Concerning the gods, I have no means of knowing whether they exist or not or of what sort they may be, because of the obscurity of the subject, and the brevity of human life.

3. Protagoras: Moral Skeptic
"Man is the measure of all things: of the things which are, that they are, and of the things which are not, that they are not"

4. The main points of Protagoras’ moral skepticism:
There is no ultimate moral truth
Our individual moral views are equally true
The practical benefit of our moral values is more important than their truth
The practical benefit of moral values is a function of social custom rather than nature

5. William Graham Sumner:
We learn [the morals of our society] as unconsciously as we learn to walk and hear and breathe, and [we] never know any reason why the [morals] are what they are. The justification of them is that when we wake to consciousness of life we find the facts which already hold us in the bonds of tradition, custom and habit.”

7. David Hume 1711 - 1776 Simple subjectivism...
‘morality is a matter of sentiment rather than fact…’
A sense like our other senses...filtering our experience...

8. The agent: the person doing (or not doing) the action
The receiver: the person directly affected
The spectator: the person watching and judging

9. Hume's moral theory: Agents perform actions.
Receivers experience pleasure or pain.
Spectators sympathetically experience the pleasure or pain.
The moral spectator's sympathetic pleasure or pain constitutes a moral assessment of the agent's character trait, thereby deeming the trait to be a virtue or a vice.

10. Hume's moral theory: Agents perform actions.
Receivers experience pleasure or pain.
Spectators sympathetically experience the pleasure or pain.
The moral spectator's sympathetic pleasure or pain constitutes a moral assessment of the agent's character trait, thereby deeming the trait to be a virtue or a vice.

11. Hume's moral theory: Also important: The agent performs an act
The receiver either benefits or suffers
The spectator judges what he sees
If the spectator approves, the act was moral
If the spectator disapproves, the act was immoral
Also important:
Moral actions stem from character:
Virtuous
Vicious

12. Sympathy is the key...

13. Hume: simple subjectivism...
“defines virtue to be whatever mental action or quality gives to a spectator the pleasing sentiment of approbation; and vice the contrary.”

14. Simple subjectivism seems good and easy and tolerant...
But it has traps:
It cannot account for moral disagreement

15. Simple subjectivism seems good and easy and tolerant...
But it has traps:
It cannot account for moral disagreement
It implies that we’re always right

16. Simple subjectivism seems good and easy and tolerant...
But it has traps:
It cannot account for moral disagreement
It implies that we’re always right
It makes morality itself a useless concept

17. Simple subjectivism seems good and easy and tolerant...
But it has traps:
It cannot account for moral disagreement
It implies that we’re always right
It makes morality itself a useless concept
It reduces moral choices to mere likes and dislikes

18. The Second Stage: Emotivism
Emotivist Thesis:
moral judgments -- though they have the surface grammar of statements -- are really disguised commands.

19. 3.5: Rachels responds: Moral judgments must be supported by reasons...
If you like peaches, you don’t have to defend your preference
But if you like torturing cats, you should have a reason

20. 3.5: Rachels’ counterproposal:
There are moral facts...
It's a false dichotomy to think
Either there are moral facts in the same way that there are facts about stars and planets
Or else "values" are nothing more than the expression of subjective feelings.
Maybe there’s a third way...

21. 3.5: Rachels "Moral truths are truths of reason:
that is...a moral judgment is true if it is backed by better reasons than the alternatives." P 45

22. Conventional ethical relativism
If we are all our own moral arbiters, how can there be any ‘morality’?
Conventionalism tries to blunt the harshness of that by requiring ‘social acceptance’

23. Traps here also...
Hitler had social acceptance for his invasion of Poland
George Bush had social acceptance for his invasion of Iraq

24. 3.7 The Question of Homosexuality...

25. Rachels conclusion...
moral thinking and moral conduct are a matter of weighing reasons and being guided by them
in focusing on attitudes and feelings, Ethical Subjectivism seems to be going in the wrong direction

26. Leopold and Loeb 1924
Clarence Darrow for the defence

27. Charles Manson

28. Ashley...

29. Ashley

30. Ashley

31. Ashley

32. Katie Thorpe