1. 10.06.2011 Nino Abzianidze PhD. Student E-Mail: nineza_abzianidze@hotmail.com Telefon: +41 (0) 44 634 501 Adresse: Affolternstrasse 56, 8050 Zurich, Switzerland Internet: http://www.nccr-democracy.uzh.ch Perception of Abkhaz as Enemy by Georgian Print Media in 1991-93

2. Table of contents I. Introduction I.II Aim of the research I.III Research Question and Hypothesis I.IV Methodology II. Theoretical Framework III. Case study IV.I Identification of perceptions of Abkhaz by Georgian media in 1991-93 IV. II Uncertainty of the enemy image – stable or unsteady? iV. Conclusions 210.06.2011

3. 3 Introduction Why Abkhaz? Problem of Abkhazia still significant Returning land factor of people Why perceptions? Crucial role of a well-defined image of the enemy Georgians vs. ??? Why media? Perceptions may vary according to the different layers of society Print media as one of the social groups

4. 10.06.20114 Aim of the Research Identify how Abkhaz were perceived by the Georgian print media in 1991-93 How well- defined was perception of the enemy image? At what extent did the enemy image imply Abkhaz? Was the perception of the enemy image affected by the government changes?

5. 10.06.2011 Research Questions and Hypothesis How well-defined were perceptions of Abkhaz as enemy by the Georgian print media in 1991-93? - Abkhaz as an ethnic group - Abkhaz as separatists Did the government change affect perception of Abkhaz as the enemy? Perception of the enemy by Georgian print media was not well defined i.e. was uncertain. Though, Abkhaz people were not perceived as enemy Despite the change of governments, uncertainty of the enemy image was maintained. Though, the state of war could have affected certain aspects of perceptions. 5

6. 10.06.20116 Research Period 1991-1993 –Divided into three time periods Gamsakhurdia period – June-December, 1991 Military/State Council period – January-Sept., 1992 Shevardnadze period – October-September, 1993 Division made according to the government changes

7. 10.06.20117 Methodology The Case Study –Literary Georgia – sample of 122 articles Arguments: Tribune of writers, scholars and other public figures Published more analytical than news-based articles. As a result of government change in 1991-92 editorial stuff was changed ( editorial stuffs supported existing Gov.) Definitions: Articles for analyzes – articles, which concern issue of Abkhazia, including those, which concern the issue at the smallest extent Analytical articles – articles, which along with the facts contain assessments and analyzes on a certain issue. Data – citations of certain parts of relative articles.

8. 10.06.20118 Theoretical Framework Postulates of the CONSTRUCTIVIST approach and the IMAGE THEORY combined in the book Face of the Foe (2010) by Kjeld Hald Galster. –Twofold dimension of the enemy image –Problem of uncertainty over the enemy image

9. 10.06.20119 Theoretical Framework Enemy Image Tangible component Intangible component Intelligence Deep-rooted pers. Abkhaz as separatists Abkhaz as ethnic group Uncertainty about the enemy Multi-faceted enemy

10. 10.06.201110 1 st part – Identification of the perception of Abkhaz by Georgian print media Two steps of observation Abkhaz as ethnic group Abkhaz as political separatists Did the perception of Abkhaz depict clear picture of the ENEMY?

11. 10.06.201111 1 st part – Identification of the perception of Abkhaz by Georgian print media Abkhaz as ethnic group Genuine Christian Abkhaz of Georgian origins Islamist Absua came from North Caucasus in XVI and XVII centuries Citation for Evidence: In order to restore historical justice I think it is necessary to restore ancient name of Georgian inhabitants of Abkhazia and to call them Georgian Abkhaz. And those, whom we call Abkhaz today, should be called Absua Abkhaz. (Sulakauri, 1993. We should call Georgian Abkhaz and Absua Abkhaz, April 2, p. 3)

12. 10.06.201112 1 st part – Identification of the perception of Abkhaz by Georgian print media Abkhaz as political separatists Separatists – political elite, not the Abkhazian people Abkhaz political elite – provocateur of separatist sentiments among Abkhaz people Abkhaz people – Brothers and Friends Citation for Evidence: Unfortunately, we have to say that some politicians with no ability of foresight still push diligent and high moral Abkhaz man to confront Georgians. (Tasoev, 1992, Tomorrow could be late! March 8, p. 10)

13. 10.06.201113 1 st part – Identification of the perception of Abkhaz by Georgian print media Ethnic Group Abkhaz VS. Absua Separatists Ordinary people VS. Political elite

14. 10.06.201114 1 st part – Identification of the perception of Abkhaz by Georgian print media Multi- faceted image of the enemy Enemy #1 – Absua Separatists Enemy #2 - Former President and his supporters Enemy #3 – Confederation of Mountainous People Enemy #4 - Russia

15. 10.06.201115 2 nd part – Uncertainty of the enemy image – stable or unsteady? Step 1 Content analyze of the last articles of each period enemy image in the conflict remained uncertain along the whole research period Step 2 Trends of slight change in perceptions Previously Abkhaz politicians and Absua separatists After Abkhaz man and Abkhaz tend to become part of the enemy image

16. 10.06.201116 Conclusion –Hypothesis proved By combination results of observing Abkhaz as ethnic group and Abkhaz as separatists and adding to this all the components that enemy image implied, a picture of multifaceted enemy, which does not include indigenous Abkhaz people is obvious. –Hypothesis proved Government change did not affect major trends of perceptions of Abkhaz by the print media, i.e. multi- faceted enemy image remained uncertain. The state of war definitely caused some trends of slight change, which contributed to the uncertain and multifaceted enemy image once more. Part 1Part 2

17. 10.06.201117 Perspective for PhD project Aim: –Generalizing research –Extending time and scope of the research –Adding comparative component

18. 10.06.201118 Perspective for PhD project Shaping Political Identities through Mass Media in Post-War Settings A Comparative Study of the Caucasus and the Western Balkans –Cases of Georgia and Bosnia-Herzegovina

19. 10.06.201119 Perspective for PhD project Focus on representation not the perception Proposed RQ: –Do media contribute to the reconciliation of the warring parties in the post-war environment?

20. 10.06.201120 Perspective for PhD project Case of Georgia Focus on war periods – 1991-1996/2006-2011 Abkhaz + South Ossetians More representative media

21. 10.06.201121 Perspective for PhD project Proposed methodology: – Content Analyzes –Quantitative approach –Survey

22. 10.06.201122 Questions –Is this rough picture of the PhD project on the right track? –What would be your suggestions concerning methodology? –What would be your suggestions for further steps?

23. 10.06.201123 Thank you!