Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Meeting of the Working Party

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Meeting of the Working Party"— Presentation transcript:

1 Merging national population grids (bottom-up approach) into a European dataset
Meeting of the Working Party "Geographical Information Systems for Statistics" Luxembourg, March 15-16, 2007 Rina Tammisto Statistics Finland, Population Statistics

2 Topics 1) Producing grid data The Finnish data set
2) The Grid data sets compiled for the posters The Nordic data set, The European data set Dissimilarities in the grid data 3) Harmonization challenge Population Statistics

3 1) Producing grid data “The Bottom-up method”
Register based population data The method is based on aggregation of single-unit attribute data Point base data - the location of the point is known The spatial grid net - grid data from statistical data to actual spatial data Population Statistics

4 Attribute data from several registers
Population register Taxation register Register of degrees and curricula Pension registers Employment register Business register Register of vechiles Register of buildings and dwellings Statistical data Population Households and families Employment and workplaces Buildings and housing Population Statistics

5 Grid data production environment
Data warehouse ArcGIS ( ) database; SQL Server database data compiling; by SAS or SQL Server Enterprise Manager spatiality; ESRI ArcSDE ( ) Population Statistics

6 Data producing process - from points to grids
Co-ordinates - attribute data of buildings Joining - population to buildings Data selection - by the attribute data of population IDs of grids - data is aggregated in grid squares A reference point - the lower left corner of the grid cell Data security - if needed Aggregated data is stored Data and the grid net are joined Editing the table structure Checks Population Statistics

7 2) The Grid data sets compiled for the posters
The Nordic Grid poster First poster 1997: Finland and Sweden, Norway 2003, Denmark 2004 The European Grid poster 2006 the four Nordic countries + Austria, Estonia, the Netherlands and Switzerland Data has been compiled by Statistics Finland since 2004 Population Statistics

8 Dissimilarities in the grid data
General comparison of the Nordic data has been done (2003, 2005) dissemination prices co-ordinate systems disclosure control No comparison done concerning producing processes, the quality and characteristics of spatiality Population Statistics

9 2 the middle points of real estates - Sweden, Estonia (rural)
x X Dissimilarities concerning the European grid data set: x x 1 2 The reference point of the data 13 Työpajankatu 3 1 the middlepoint of buildings - Finland, Austria, Estonia (urban), Switzerland 2 the middle points of real estates - Sweden, Estonia (rural) 3 addresses - Denmark, Norway, the Netherlands Population Statistics

10 Dissimilarities concerning the European grid data set:
1) Date, updating frequency 2) Population without spatial information (indirect spatiality) 3) Land area, glaciers, mountain areas 4) The effects of data security on the comparison of data Population Statistics

11 Population Statistics

12 3) Harmonization challenges I
A) Essential: The European Grid Net origo, co-ordinate system, uniform ID-numbers Comparable figures from the unprotected data Describing the core definitions uniformly total land area (-->population density information) population in the grid squares - covers the special population groups without co-ordinates (e.g. pop. living in nursing institutions) Describing the prosesses uniformly Population Statistics

13 EULIS, European Land Information Service
Harmonization and standardization Quality labeling Standardization of services A framework for standardization - Land transactions and registration process methodogy of e.g. SADT Structure Analysis and Design Technics Source: Esa Tiainen, National Land Survey of Finland Population Statistics

14 Describing the grid producing processes
National practises ect., described in a predefined way on predefined forms -->unified prosess flow charts F I N L A N D Population Register Centre Municipality authrity Workflow Phases Organisations and authorities involved Responsibilities, priorities, rights, obligations Population Statistics

15 Organisations and authorities involved
Country 1 Country 2 Workflow Phases Organisations and authorities involved Responsibilities, priorities, rights, obligations Similarities Differences Population Statistics

16 Harmonization challenges II
B) Useful to know: ways to produce, handle, store and deliver grid data Essential? or even possible parts, because of the differences in infrastructures at national levels Data compiling Data updating frequency Classifications Population Statistics

17 Drawing the limit on what to harmonize -> any consequenses at 1 km grid level?
Significance of these national differences depends on the final use of the data Population Statistics

18 Conclusions The need of a joint project for
definition work (standardization work) describing work, e.g. the need of a proper descriptions of the national producing processes Role of Eurostat? support the standardizing work give tools ect. Population Statistics

19 C8 Estimated Population Statistics

20 Thank you for your attention !
Population Statistics


Download ppt "Meeting of the Working Party"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google