Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byVanessa Roberts Modified over 6 years ago
1
STUDY ON FEATURES OF CLINIC, BIOCLINIC AND DIAGNOSIS THE SUBTYPE OF ACUTE LEUKEMIA IN VIETTIEP FRIENDSHIP HOSPITAL, Dr: Pham Thi Loc Hematology and blood transfusion department Hai Phong University Medicine and Pharmacy
2
Introduction Acute leukemia (LA) is a group of malignant conditions of hematopoietic system with two common types, namely acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The treatment is very difficult and proportion of failure is too high. The accurate typing of the disease can improve survival proportion. HP used technique cytochemical staining to confirm the type of AL more exact. NIHBT used to immunophenotyping and cytogenetics to determine subtype of AL 1
3
Objectives of the study
Describe the characteristics of clinic, bioclinic and diagnosis of AL in Viettiep Friendship Hospital, Determine subtype of AL following the classification of F.A.B in these cases.
4
1. Location and time of research
Materials and methods 1. Location and time of research Hematology department in VietTiep Friendship Hospital from 1/ / 2016. 2. Selected criterion: Diagnosis with Blast ≥ 30% in bone marow 3. Sample: convenient, not probable Chose 102 patients with group retrospective: 71 cases and group prospective: 31 cases 4. Study design: retrospective and prospective processes 5. Data processing: SPSS 20.0
5
6. Diagnostic criterion on this research Diagnosis anemia: WHO 2012
Materials and methods 6. Diagnostic criterion on this research Diagnosis anemia: WHO 2012 Diagnosis infection: WHO 2012 Diagnosis AL: F.A.B and WHO 2001 Diagnosis subtype of AL: F.A.B and WHO 2001
6
results and discussion
1. Characteristics of clinic and bioclinic of patients Table 1: the rate of patients with ages age n = 102 Percentage ≤ 30 19 18.6 30- 39 11 10.8 40- 49 8 7.8 50- 59 27 26.5 60- 69 10 9.8 ≥ 70 Mean age 53.5 ± 19.9 N.T.M.An(1998): age > 60t =25% Đ. H. Anh(2006): age> 50t = 12.3%
7
results and discussion
Table 2: rate of patients with age and sex Group ages male female n % < 30 14 22.6 5 12.5 30 – 39 7 11.3 4 10.0 40 – 49 3 4.8 50 – 59 16 25.8 11 27.5 60 – 69 8 12.9 2 5.0 ≥ 70 13 32.5 total 62 100% 40 100 X ± SD 51.5 ± 20.1 56.6 ± 19.3
8
results and discussion
Table 3: priciple clinical symptoms prognostic Number of patient (n=102) Percentage Fatigue, anemia 90 92.8 Petechia 47 48.5 fever 44 45.4 Bone pain 21 21.6 N.T.L.Hương (2013) anemia:82.9% petechia :50.7%, infection: 58.3% bone pain: 9.8%. N.T.Hải(2010) anemia: 88.7%, petechia : 59% inf: 62% bone pain: 11.3%
9
results and discussion
Table 4:clinical symptoms liver, spleen, lymph node Clinical signs n = 102 Percentage Enlarged liver 15 14.7 Enlarged spleen 43 42.2 Enlarged node 32 32.4 Enlarged liver and spleen 5 4.9 Enlarged liver and node 7 6.9 Enlarged spleen, node 13 12.8 Enlarged liver, spleen, node D.H.Anh (2006) liver: 26.2% spleen: 18.5% lymph node: 27.7% N.T.L.Hương (2013) liver: 22.0% spleen: 19.5% node: 14.6%
10
results and discussion
Chart 1: anemia’s level on clinic 1: minor level 2: medium level 3: major level
11
results and discussion
Table 5: some blood tests test unit X ± SD Min Max GOT U/l 45.5 ±77.7 10.0 608.0 GPT 42.1±77.4 5.0 605.0 Ure mmol/l 5.6±0.2 2.5 12.8 Creatin Mmol/l 87.6±3.5 56.0 395.0 Ca++ 2.4±0.2 1.6 2.80 K + 3.6±0.1 2.1 4.8 Glucose plasma 6.1±0.2 2.9 17.4 N.T.T.Hải (2010) GOT: 81,1±128, GPT: 51.6± 118.6, ure: 6.6±4.6, cre: 73.2±21.8, Ca++: 2.2± 1.2 K+: 3.8± 21.8, glucose: 6.6±4.6
12
results and discussion
Table 6: basic coagulation tests tests decrease normal rise(kéo dài) p Number of patient % PT 48 47.1 54 52.9 <0.05 APTT 3 2.9 83 81.4 16 15.7 Fib 8 7.8% 82 80.4 12 11.8 N.T.L.Hương (2013) PT decrease: 43.9% APTT rise: 19.5%, FIB low: 12.2%
13
results and discussion
Table 7. Hemoglobin concentration in peripheral blood Hemoglobin ( g/l ) n = 102 Percentage ≤60 10 9.8 61- 80 37 36.3 81-100 36 35.3 15 14.7 >120 4 3.9 Mean Hemoglobin 83.6± 15.7 N.T.L.Hương (2013) hb trung bình: 76.7±18.5 min: 45, max: 118g/l
14
results and discussion
Table 8: number of WBC in peripheral blood WBC (giga/ lit) n = 102 % < 4 12 11.8 4- 10 17 16.7 10,1- 100 53 52.0 > 100 20 19.6 Mean of WBC 62.5 ±128.1 N.T.L.Hương(2013) mean WBC:44.3 ± 81.7 min: 0.5 max: 359
15
results and discussion
Table 9. number of platelet in peripheral blood platelet (Giga/ lít) n =102 Percentage ≤ 20 16 15.7 21- 50 33 32.4 36 35.3 7 6.9 8 7.8 >450 2 2.0 Mean of platelet 60± 54.2 N.T.L.Hương (2013) mean of platelet: 32 ± 43.7 min: 5 max: 104 G/l
16
results and discussion
Chart 2: proportion of blast in peripheral blood N.T.L.Hương (2013) mean of blasts: 43.6± 34.4 min: 0% max: 95%
17
results and discussion
Table 10. number of bone cells Bone cell (Giga/lít) n = 102 percentage < 30 14 13.7 18 17.6 > 100 70 68.6 Mean of bone cell 218.9 ± 177 N.T.L.Hương (2013) mean of bone cell: ± 169, min: 10G/l, Max: 678.5G/l
18
results and discussion
Chart 3: proportion of blasts in bone marrow N.T.L.Hương (2013) mean % blasts in bone: 66.1 ± 18.6 min: 30% max: 92% We are: % blasts in bone: 65.9 ± 20.4 min: 29.5% max: 96%
19
results and discussion
Table 12. proportion of reticulocyte in bone marrow and peripheral blood. reticulocyte X ± SD Min(%) Max(%) reticulocyte in peripheral blood 1.0 ± 0.4 0.3 1.3 reticulocyte in bone marrow 0.4 ± 0.2 0.2 0.7 N.T.L.Hương (2013) % HCl máu: 0.4% ± 0.5%, min: 0.1% max: 1.1%, % HCL tủy TB: 0.4% ± 0.3%, min: 0.1%, max: 0.9% 1
20
results and discussion
Chart 5. Classification of AML with morphology n1= 58 n2= 23 p<0.05 N.T.M.Hương(2013) M0: 2.4%,, M1: 12.2%, M2: 36.6%, M3: 2.4%, M4: 24.4%. M5:19.6%, M6: 2.4%, M7:0%
21
results and discussion
Chart 6. Classification of ALL with morphology n1=13 n2=8 p>0.05 P.Q.Vinh (2006) L1: 18.5%, L2: 74.5% L3: 7.0%
22
results and discussion
Table13: classification of AL with cytochemical staining Cytochemical stain Sudan black Perosidase PAS Esterase Total of patient M1 + - 1 M2 ++ 10 M3 +++ 4 M4 5 M5 3 L1 L2 Total 31
23
results and discussion
Table14: classification of AL with immunophenotyping and cytogenetics (NIHBT) Subtype Immuno phenotype cytogenetic Total of patient M1 CD 13, CD 33 t(9,11) 1 M2 CD 13, HLA-DR t(8,21) 10 M3 CD 15, CD 33 t(15,17) 4 M4 CD 11b, CD 33 +21, +22 5 M5 +8,11q23 3 L1 TdT, CD19 t(9;22) L2 CD3, CD7 Total 31
24
conclusion Characteristic clinic: male/female: 2:1, highest age group with AL >70t. 92.8% anemia, 45.4% infection and 48.5% petechia. Characteristic peripheral blood test: mean of Hb: 83.4± 19.0g/l, platelets: 79.4± G/l , WBC: 62.5± 89.4 G/l, percentage of blood blast: 54.3± 25.2 %. Characteristic of bone marrow test: number of bone cell: ± G/l. percentage of blast in bone marrow: 65.9± 20.4%.
25
conclusion Result of classification of AL in research
In group 1(n= 71): M2= 21.6%, M3= 13.7%, M0, M6, M7 =0%, 19.6% AML not confirm subtype. L1=14.3%, L2= 47.6%, L3=0%, 38.1% patients didn’t confirm subtype. In group 2(n = 31): M2=32.3%, M3 =12.9%, L1= 37.5%, L2= 62.5% .M0, M6, M7,L3 =0%, number of patient didn’t confirm subtype = 0%.
26
Thanks for your attention!
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.