1. Implementation 3 Project Review 17.3.2004
VirtuCo
Implementation 3
Project Review

2. Agenda Project status Used work practices Completed work
achieved goals in the iteration
project metrics
Used work practices
Completed work
Mobile demo
Plans for the next iteration
Sami Hanhijärvi

3. Status of planned goals
Multiplayer tank game
Done to the promised extent
Peer testing
Done
Produced information about the reliability of the system
Finalize implementation
Only bug fixes left
Sami Hanhijärvi

4. Status of planned deliverables
Project plan
Update to match delivery plans
Technical documentation
Architecture description of new requirements added
Test case specifications
Updated to cover the game
Test report
Created for ran tests
Sami Hanhijärvi

5. Realization of the tasks
Quite as planned
Some shifts between parallel tasks
Sami Hanhijärvi

6. Working hours by person
Realized hours in this iteration
Plan in the beginning of this iteration
Real
Plan
Diff
Hannu
34+1 38 -3
Jorma
18+1 33
-14
Kaarle
52+1 39 14
Kai
23+1 18 6
Petteri
49+1 12
Sami
36+3 46 -7
Ville
10+1 7 4
Total
222+9
219 PP I1 I2
Subtot I3 DE
Total
Hannu 30 67 55
152 36 22
210
Jorma 25 54 93
172 24 14
Kaarle 70 53
153 40 17
Kai 32 89 45
166 27
Petteri 41 72 57
160 18
Sami 59
159 21
220
Ville 44
203 9 8
257
465
451
704
194
121
1490
Latest plan (inc. realized hours and other updates)
Work distribution could have been better.
Delivery tasks clarified, planned hours reduced. PP I1 I2 I3
Subtot DE
Total
Hannu 30 67 55 35
187 16
203
Jorma 25 54 93 19
191
210
Kaarle 70 53
206 4
211
Kai 32 89 45 24
190
207
Petteri 41 62 57 50 2
212
Sami 59 39
198 18
220
Ville 44 11
214
257
465
451
231
1398 74
1472
Sami Hanhijärvi

7. Hours per work type in I3
Sami Hanhijärvi

8. Hours per work type in the whole project
Sami Hanhijärvi

9. Quality metrics
Issue metrics PP I1 I2 I3
Peer
Total
Reported 92 4 25 10 11
142
Closed 8
132
Open 6 3 9
Implementation 3
Blockers
Critical
Major
Minor
Trivial
Total
Total open 2 3 9
This iteration reported 4 8 6 21
Peer testing produced bugs that are more informative than bugs to be fixed
Sami Hanhijärvi

10. Quality assessment J K Bugs remain, but many are out of our scope.
Functional area
Coverage
Quality
Comments
Conversation 3 J
Works overall. One minor bug remains.
Push messages 2
Works, problems with actual internet connections and JBoss.
Tank game K
Some critical bugs in extreme situations.
User management
Works overall.
Legend
Coverage:
0 = nothing
1 = we looked at it
2 = we checked all functions
3 = it’s tested
Quality:
J = quality is good
K = not sure
L = quality is bad
Bugs remain, but many are out of our scope.
Sami Hanhijärvi

11. Software size
Lines of code I1 I2 I3 DE
Client total
2114
5895
9971
Client comments
946
2404
3804
Server total
2006
4592
5958
Server comments
941
1958
2458
Common total
204
156
202
Common comments
109 99
132
Total
4324
10643
16131
Comments
1996
4461
6394
Lines of code per programming hour I1 I2 I3 DE
Functional lines of code 15 17 40
Any line of code 27 28 61
Sami Hanhijärvi

12. Risks MIDP2.0 phone Time underrun
Neutralized, when phone was received.
Software worked quite easily with phone.
Time underrun
Didn’t happen, because scope was limited in I2
Sami Hanhijärvi

13. Work practices Unit tests Refactoring Usability tests Sami Hanhijärvi

14. Unit tests Metrics (testclasses / actual classes)
client: 12 / 38 = 31,6%
common: 0 / 3 = 0%
server: 5 / 63 = 7,9%
all: 17 / 104 = 16,3%
Presentation held in review
Sami Hanhijärvi

15. Refactoring Used while adding new functionality
A presenation is held in review.
Sami Hanhijärvi

16. Usability tests Usability was considered when creating tank game
Peer tests worked also as usability tests
A presentation is held in review.
Sami Hanhijärvi

17. Results of the iteration
Software
Tank game
Demonstration
New documentation
Peer test report
Sami Hanhijärvi

18. Lessons learned NDS doesn’t allow network connections in Linux.
Sami Hanhijärvi

19. Service overview
by Jorma Rinkinen
Sami Hanhijärvi

20. Demonstration
Sami Hanhijärvi

21. Plans for the next iteration
Goals
Good documentation
Deliverables
Final report
PSE documents
Auth. & billing considerations
SW package
Risks
Minor time underrun risk
Sami Hanhijärvi