Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

AIF Florida Water Forum Carol Howard Orlando, FL Sept. 21, 2017

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "AIF Florida Water Forum Carol Howard Orlando, FL Sept. 21, 2017"— Presentation transcript:

1 AIF Florida Water Forum Carol Howard Orlando, FL Sept. 21, 2017
11/13/2018 AIF Florida Water Forum Contemporary Private Funding Structures for Water Resource Projects Sept. 21, 2017 Carol Howard Orlando, FL

2 Poseidon Water Poseidon Water: Leading U.S. water infrastructure development specialist employing a performance-based, Public-Private Partnership approach Founded in 1995; headquartered in Boston, MA with presence in CA, FL, and TX Developer of Carlsbad Desalination Plant and other water infrastructure projects Majority owned by Brookfield Infrastructure Partners Brookfield Asset Management: Global owner and operator of alternative assets 115-year track record in real assets with a global presence (100 offices or locations; ~55,000 employees) $250B of assets under management (AUM) – $135B in U.S. (~11,000 employees) Brookfield in Florida (as of Dec 2016): Assets: $4.6B AUM Employees: ~180 Projects/Assets: ~82 11/13/2018

3 Brookfield | Florida Presence
11/13/2018

4 What is a P3 Concession? Public-Private Partnership (“P3”) is a method of delivering public infrastructure in which significant risks are transferred to the private sector developer, builder, operator, and finance partner, while the public agency retains certain risks and has the ability to retain project/asset ownership Alignment of interests between Public and Private sector Guaranteed on-time and on-budget performance Accelerated delivery of critical project infrastructure Public asset investment is protected because facility condition and performance is guaranteed for a long-term period (30 to 50 years) Provides greater “value-for-money,” reflecting the added value of risk transfer (operation, maintenance, compliance, financing, delivery, etc.) using a P3 approach as compared to a traditional project delivery 11/13/2018

5 Public-Private Partnership is Not Privatization
11/13/2018 P3 Concession Overview Development: Project Company funds upfront development expenses to fully define the project, secure permits, and establish final pricing Construction: Project Company provides project funding (debt & equity), potentially including tax-exempt public financing through Private Activity Bonds, WIFIA and State Revolving Funds Risk Transfer: Public Partner only pays if Project Company meets performance obligations Creates real value for taxpayers by transferring the risk of cost overruns, schedule delays, performance shortfalls, and deferred maintenance Debt Burden: Preserves public partner debt capacity with potential for credit improvement Expedited Schedule: Accelerated project delivery is not constrained by lengthy procurement processes Project/Asset and operations reverts to public agency at end of P3 contract term Public-Private Partnership is Not Privatization 11/13/2018

6 Typical P3 Concession Structure
Key Agreements Payments Management Services Agreement Project Company Operations & Maintenance Provider Engineering, Procurement, and Construction Contractor Water Purchase Loan O&M Service Agreement EPC Agreement Public Agency/Off-taker Debt Provider: Bond Investors or Banks Project Revenues Debt Proceeds/ Repayments Equity Contribution Agreement 11/13/2018

7 Addressing Common P3 Concession Concerns
Benefits Higher Cost of Funding Incentivizes overall lower lifecycle cost Public Agencies lack sufficient public funding to meet water infrastructure needs Ability to combine public and private funding sources; traditional tax-exempt public financing is not always the lowest cost financing for municipal facilities P3 entities are able to access a wide range of financing options, including both taxable and tax-exempt (Public) debt & equity P3 is Privatization Public Private Partnership is not Privatization Flexibility to structure P3 Projects as concession agreements, service/lease agreements or full asset ownership by the Project Company under Public oversight Roles and responsibilities of Public and Private Partners are well defined in agreement Board/Utility Control P3 Concession Contract defines controls desired by the Public entity in the system/assets Public entity maintains oversight and step-in rights Scope book, standards and regulation, guarantees, revisions/approval rights ensures Public entity controls O&M Integration Difficulties Agreement structured to integrate O&M of Project Company with existing operations Option for Public employees to work for the Project Company Transfer of the Project and its operations to the Public entity at end of the contract term Contract restricts Public Entity Agreement payments is an operating cost, similar to debt payments, overhead, O&M costs, etc. associated with Public financing P3 is based on a performance-based contract; Public entity doesn’t pay if Project Company doesn’t meet performance obligations P3 provides long-term price and rate certainty No Value to Risk Transferred Value-for-money (VfM) analysis is a useful tool to evaluate value of risk transfer Multiple components of projects can be delivered using split delivery method Inclusion of long-term equity is the critical component that drives performance, efficiency and innovation 11/13/2018

8 Potential P3 Concession Risk Allocation
Risk Description Project Company Public Agency Permitting Financing Interest Rate x Construction Technology Operating Performance Electricity Consumption Pricing Water or Wastewater Supply & Quality Regulation/Change in Law 11/13/2018

9 When Does a P3 Concession Make Sense?
Situation Notes Underinvestment and/or Operational/ Maintenance Difficulty Where transfer of operating performance to a qualified and experienced private sector operator will improve system reliability and performance Where system has been chronically underinvested in or has deferred maintenance and significant upgrade/ capital investment is required Consent Decree Requiring a new technology and/or significant capital investment, i.e. Cranston Wastewater Concession (See Case Study) Financial Constraint Budget or debt limitation or existing liability such as pension obligation, operating deficit or high utility debt burden New Technology Where the public agency is more comfortable transferring the technology risk to the private sector, i.e. Carlsbad Desalination Project Advanced Schedule Where project delivery is needed in a tight timeframe, the private sector can guarantee delivery on a date certain, fixed-price basis. For example, to meet permit compliance or water supply constraint Regional Project Where no regional governance or organization exists or to serve an existing regional agency 11/13/2018

10 11/13/2018 Concession Case Study

11 Cranston Wastewater Concession | Overview
11/13/2018 Cranston Wastewater Concession | Overview Project Description: Poseidon entered into a 25-year concession to Lease, Upgrade, Operate, Maintain, and Transfer the City of Cranston’s wastewater treatment system System Overview: 23 MGD WWTP, 250-mile collection system, and pump stations Project Value: $77M in non-recourse debt & equity, including $48M upfront lease payment to the City of Cranston Equity: $8.6M Taxable Institutional Debt: $39.5M from New York Life and John Hancock (8.05%) Tax-exempt Revenue Debt: $28.5M (5.8%) from RI Clean Water Finance Agency1 Agreed capital improvement program ensured system modernization/expansion to meet customer needs, regulatory requirements (incl. Consent Decree), and deadlines Status: 25-year concession term from 1997 – 2022 First Large-Scale WWTP P3 & Upgrade in the U.S. 1 Now the Rhode Island Infrastructure Bank (“RIIB”) 11/13/2018

12 Cranston | Project Benefits
11/13/2018 Cranston | Project Benefits City received $48M upfront payment to repay outstanding sewer debt and cover the City’s budget deficit Expected to yield $76M in accumulated savings and $24M in present-value benefits (by reducing rate of user fee increases and avoiding tax increases) Lease structure maintained public ownership and City continued to set rates, handle billing and collection, and enforce their pretreatment program City avoided significant bond issuance; and net payment was expected to be viewed positively by credit rating agencies; credit rating has significantly improved since contract inception from Baa2/BBB+ to A1/AA- (Moody’s/S&P) System and WWTP employees retained Performance-based contracting approach transfers risk to private entity, drives innovation and increased efficiency, and delivers greater value, price certainty, and long-term savings over the contract duration 11/13/2018

13 Florida P3 Legislation HB 85: enrolled in 2013
Qualifying Project: includes water/wastewater facilities Responsible Public Entity: counties, municipalities, school boards, regional entities, state subdivisions Unsolicited Proposals: permitted Proposal Requirements: Conceptual design/plan General financing plan Proposed user fees or lease/service payments over the term Proposal Ranking: Professional Qualifications, General Business Terms, Innovative Design Techniques, Cost-reduction Terms, and Finance Terms 11/13/2018

14 Questions? _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Carol Howard –


Download ppt "AIF Florida Water Forum Carol Howard Orlando, FL Sept. 21, 2017"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google