Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

GLOBAL BUDGET OF ATMOSPHERIC ACETONE

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "GLOBAL BUDGET OF ATMOSPHERIC ACETONE"— Presentation transcript:

1 GLOBAL BUDGET OF ATMOSPHERIC ACETONE
Singh et al This work This work [2000] (a priori) (optimized) SOURCES (Tg yr-1) (37-80) (49-105) (80-110) Terrestrial vegetation (10-20) (0-52) (24-42) Plant decay (4-8) (0-18) (-3-7) Biomass burning (3-10) (2-5) (3-7) Industry (1-3) (1-2) (1-2) Oceans (0-20) (21-33) Oxidation of isoalkanes (12-24) (10-30) (16-26) Oxidation of terpenes, MBO 11 (7-15) (3-15) (3-11) SINKS (Tg yr-1) (37-80) Photolysis (24-51) Oxidation by OH (9-19) Deposition to land (4-10) Uptake by ocean LIFETIME days days days

2 ATMOSPHERIC OBSERVATIONS OF ACETONE (0.2-3 ppbv)
TRACE-A ABLE -3B Surface sites PEM -WB SONEX PEM-TB

3 OCEANIC SIGNATURE IN ATMOSPHERIC ACETONE OBSERVATIONS?
South Pacific [Singh et al., 2001] southern Sweden [Solberg et al., 1996] Low winter values over Europe: ocean sink? High values over South Pacific: ocean source?

4 ROLE OF OCEAN IN ATMOSPHERIC BUDGET OF ACETONE
Biological uptake (Kieber et al., 1990) SINK? H298 = 30 M atm-1; physical uptake limited by both gas- and aqueous-phase transfer hn SOURCE? Zhou and Mopper (1997) Organic microlayer organic microlayer Model sink as adjustable saturation ratio R Model source as proportional To UV-B flux

5 INVERSE MODEL ANALYSIS OF ACETONE BUDGET
Global 3-D model (“forward model”): defines sensitivity of atmospheric concentrations to global sources/sinks (“state vector”) A priori best estimate of sources/sinks (with errors) Observed atmospheric concentrations (with “errors”) A posteriori optimized estimate of sources/sinks

6 CONSTRUCTING THE A PRIORI: SIMULATION OF C3-5 ISOALKANES TO IMPROVE CONSTRAINT ON EMISSIONS
observed model (EDGAR) model (Piccot+) Global propane source of 12 Tg C yr-1, mainly natural gas

7 CONTRIBUTION OF DIFFERENT SOURCES TO A PRIORI BUDGET OF ACETONE (symbols: observations lines: model)

8 FITTING OF OCEAN SATURATION RATIO R TO MINIMIZE MODEL vs
FITTING OF OCEAN SATURATION RATIO R TO MINIMIZE MODEL vs. OBSERVED CHI-SQUARE IN A POSTERIORI OPTIMIZED SOURCES Best fit for R =

9 OPTIMIZED GLOBAL 3-D MODEL SIMULATION OF ATMOSPHERIC ACETONE
a priori sources/sinks; c2 = 1.3 Optimized sources/sinks (including “microbial” ocean sink, photochemical ocean source); c2 = 0.39

10 SURFACE AIR ACETONE CONCENTRATIONS IN OPTIMIZED SIMULATION


Download ppt "GLOBAL BUDGET OF ATMOSPHERIC ACETONE"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google