Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Dr. Roger Ginder Econ 338 Fall 2009 Lecture # 6

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Dr. Roger Ginder Econ 338 Fall 2009 Lecture # 6"— Presentation transcript:

1 Dr. Roger Ginder Econ 338 Fall 2009 Lecture # 6
Dairy Marketing Dr. Roger Ginder Econ 338 Fall 2009 Lecture # 6

2 Top Milk Production States, 2008
Source: NASS, USDA, Milk Production, 2/15/09 2

3 USDA, Federal Milk Marketing Administrator, Tulsa, 2/2005

4 USDA, Federal Milk Marketing Administrator, Tulsa, 2/2009

5 DAIRY PRODUCTON GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION
Would you expect the production to grow in the south and northeast where per-capita production is low? Why or Why not? Iowa has surplus per-capita consumption– Is that good or bad for the future of the industry here

6 Geographic Distribution of U.S. Milk Production
Where is the milk produced Which areas are increasing production Which areas are decreasing production

7 USDA, Federal Milk Marketing Administrator, Tulsa, 2/2009

8 Milk Production: 2007 vs 2002 USDA, Federal Milk Marketing Administrator, Tulsa, 2/2008

9

10 Regional Milk Production
as a Percent of Total U.S. Production Central Source: Federal Milk Market Administrator, Tulsa, April, 2008

11

12

13

14

15

16

17 Increases in CA + FO Milk Marketings
December 2007 vs December 2002

18 Decreases in CA + FO Milk Marketings
December 2007 vs December 2002

19 Production Costs By Region
How do the different regions in the U.S. compare with respect to production costs and net returns? What effects are the differences in cost structure likely to have on where U.S. production takes place?

20 Statistical Regions Pre 2002
MILK: NORTHEAST: New York, Pennsylvania and Vermont SOUTHEAST: Florida and Georgia UPPER MIDWEST: Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin CORN BELT: Iowa, Missouri and Ohio SOUTHERN PLAINS: Texas PACIFIC: Arizona, California and Washington Source: ERS, USDA

21 Source: USDA, ERS

22 Regional Production Returns Per Cwt., 2003
Source: ERS, USDA

23 Regional Production Returns Per Cwt., 2008
Source: ERS, USDA

24 Production Costs & Returns Per Cwt., Heartland Region
Source: ERS, USDA 24

25 Production Costs & Returns Per Cwt., Heartland Region
Source: ERS, USDA 25

26 Production Costs & Returns Per Cwt., Fruitful Rim Region
Source: ERS, USDA

27 Production Costs & Returns Per Cwt., Fruitful Rim Region
Source: ERS, USDA 27

28 Production Costs & Returns Per Cwt.,
How can producers in California pay more for feed and get lower prices for milk and still be more profitable than midwest producers??? Lower Variable Costs Per Hundred Weight More Hundred Weight of Milk Sold

29 Example Average Cost Curve
Cost/Cwt. Example Average Cost Curve $23/cwt $20cwt 17.5 k 20.5 k Cwt. of Milk Produced

30 FEED COST PER CWT – IMPACT OF VOLUME
California = /mo to feed/cow prod = 20,500 Iowa = /mo to feed/cow prod = 17,500 Annual Av Cost/CWT CA = $110/mo * 12 mo = $1320  20,500# = $6.40/cwt Iowa = $105/mo * 12 mo = $1260  17,500 = $7.20/cwt Iowa = $100/mo * 12 mo = $1200  17,500# = $6.80/cwt Iowa = $95/mo * 12 mo = $1140  17,500# = $6.50/cwt Iowa = $90/mo * 12 mo = $1080  17,500# = $6.17/cwt

31 Supply Curve Concept What producers will choose to supply at different product prices ---with all variables other than product price equal Technology, Regulation, Prices of Inputs, Prices of Other Commodities etc. are held constant A very restrictive set of assumptions

32 Price $/# Supply P m 1 Pm Q m 1 Quantity # of milk supplied Q m

33 Demand Curve Concept What Consumers will choose to buy at different product prices ---with all variables other than product price equal Consumer tastes and preferences, Consumer Income, Prices of Other Goods, Prices of Substitutes, Prices of Complements Also A very restrictive set of assumptions

34 Price $/# Supply Pm Demand Quantity # of milk demanded Qm

35 Price $/# Supply Pm Demand Quantity # of milk supplied # of milk demanded Qm

36 Elasticity of Supply Percent change in quantity supplied that results from a 1% change in price Determines how much more producers will put on the market when price increases Determines how much less producers will put on the market when price falls

37 Relatively Inelastic Supply
Price $/# Supply P1 Po Qo Q1 Quantity # of milk Relatively Inelastic Supply

38 Relatively Elastic Supply
Po P1 Qo Q1 Supply Price $/# Quantity # of milk Relatively Elastic Supply

39 Do You Think That Elasticity of Supply Could Differ by Region?
Different Production Systems Different Cost Structures Which Regions Would You Expect to Have a Less Elastic Supply Curve? Which Would You Expect to Have a More Elastic Supply Curve?

40 Relatively Inelastic Supply
Price $/# Supply P1 Po Qo Q1 Quantity # of milk Relatively Inelastic Supply

41 Relatively Elastic Supply
Po P1 Qo Q1 Supply Price $/# Quantity # of milk Relatively Elastic Supply

42 Shifts in the Supply Curve
If we relax the assumption that all else is equal the supply curve can shift For example assume that input costs decrease for all producers Producers will be willing to supply more product at all points on the supply curve The supply curve will shift downward and to the right

43 Factors that can shift supply: 1. New technology
Price So S1 Po P1 Do Qo Q1 Quantity Factors that can shift supply: 1. New technology 2. Changes in input costs 3. Raw material or resource availability 4. Legal or government program constraints on production

44 Questions?

45 Appendix

46 Statistical Regions Pre 2002
MILK: NORTHEAST: New York, Pennsylvania and Vermont SOUTHEAST: Florida and Georgia UPPER MIDWEST: Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin CORN BELT: Iowa, Missouri and Ohio SOUTHERN PLAINS: Texas PACIFIC: Arizona, California and Washington Source: ERS, USDA 46

47 Production Costs & Returns Per Cwt., 2000
Source: ERS, USDA 47

48 Production Costs & Returns Per Cwt., 2000
Source: ERS, USDA

49 Production Costs & Returns Per Cwt., Heartland Region
Source: ERS, USDA


Download ppt "Dr. Roger Ginder Econ 338 Fall 2009 Lecture # 6"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google