Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCathleen Butler Modified over 6 years ago
1
Low Cost Fundus Camera P15590 September 30th, 2014
Presented by: Daniel Sui, Ian Morency, Kevin Labourdette, Kyle Burden, Thomas Casero, Quang Huynh September 30th, 2014 Kyle
2
Overview Background Functional Decomposition Concept Development
Problem Statement Current Product House of Quality Functional Decomposition Concept Development Engineering Analysis System Level Proposal Risk Assessment Test Plan Updated Project Plan Kyle
3
Background Diabetic Retinopathy Fundus Camera Our Goals Vein Damage
Reduce Risk Many drawbacks Our Goals Low Cost No Medical Dilation Ian High-power camera Inner Eye Diabetic Retinopathy 40% mild to moderate risk Severe risk ~40% chance of blindness (4 years) Risk can be reduced ~35%
4
Background - Problem Statement
Current State Only in Optometrist offices Expensive Complicated Desired State Easily Accessible Inexpensive Intuitive to use Project Goals Research current systems and patents Develop Working Prototype Constraints FDA Requirements Ian
5
Background - Current Product
Device Issues: Prohibitively expensive Pupil dilation required Requires specialized medical personnel Heavy and large Difficult setup Tom Leads to: Inconvenient regular screenings Low patient compliance Vision loss
6
Background - HOQ Engineering Requirements Customer Requirements
Correlation Kevin Customer reqmts - voice of customer: what do they want or need? desired attributes Engineering reqmts - voice of engineer: what are the tech needs? often called specifications How do they correlate? - House of Quality CRs - rows, ERs - columns, CR v. ER - middle, ER targets & benchmarking - bottom, CR benchmarking - right Our focus is ER vs CR & ER targets/benchmarking Fundamental Question: If the ER is successfully achieved will the customer be satisfied? Assessment: 9- Strong Corr., 3- Med. Corr., 1- Weak Corr., 0- Not Corr. (empty rows = customer need not addressed, empty columns = superfluous EM, too many relationships = EM too broadly defined) TAKEAWAYS: Too broad: ease of use, consistent alignment system, non invasive Importance: High - Reduce alignment time, high quality photo (I thought cost (19) & portability (16)) Low - Measure patients refractive error (recording aberration adjustment), image display preview 8 6 7 4 13 2 12 5 10 11 3 9
7
Background - HOQ Kevin
8
Functional Decomposition
Why? How? Dan
9
Concept Development 1 - Table Top
Quang - talk about morph table Include morph table selection process pros and cons
10
Concept Development 2 - Faceplate
Kevin
11
Concept Development 3 - ClaRITy
Tom
12
Concept Development 4 - iPad Case
Kyle
13
Concept Development 5 - Goggles
IanMask face support Blocks out ambient light Consistent Takes Two pictures simultaneously L/R Picture of equal quality Much more expensive Lightweight Easy to transport Usable by all ages More difficult to engineer Controlled via computer Requires external software Easy to use/design controls Requires doctor to have computer
14
Concept Development 6 - iPhun
Dan
15
Concept Development 7 - Fundus Gun
Ian
16
Engineering Analysis - Lens Material
Glass High optical quality Cheap Plastic Lightweight Good optical quality Shatter resistant Easily processed Polycarbonate Impact resistant Thin 3D Printed Lens UV light curing Lighting fixtures Heavy Thick Shatters easily Scratches easily Poor optical quality Expensive Not designed for optical lenses Quang
17
Engineering Analysis - System Power
Faceplate Component Make/Model mA V W Cost Comments SLR Camera Nikon D3300 $550 410 gram weight Servo motor HS-311 160 4.8 0.768 $8 Torque 3.7 kg-cm 850 nm IR lamp COM-09469 50 1.6 0.08 $0.95 LED flash lamp COM-11118 80 3.4 0.272 $1.50 16-20 candela LED indicator COM-09592 20 2 0.04 $0.35 Controller Arduino Uno 500 5 2.5 $50 via USB power Dan
18
Engineering Analysis - Budget
Kevin
19
Engineering Analysis - Lighting
Light Spectrum UV: nm Visible: nm IR: 800nm-1mm Long Wavelengths - Low Energy “Infrared Imaging of Sub-Retinal Structures in the Human Occular Fundus” Visibility of Fundus Features Need to see Retinal Vessels Sub-retinal Hemorrhage Sub-retinal Deposits nm Show details Low risk of damage Ian
20
Engineering Analysis - Data Transfer
Question: Feasibility of data transfer methods for Ophthalmic images Options: Wi-Fi Bluetooth Wired USB Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) DICOM standard Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA) Health Information for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH) FDA Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act Class II 510(k) process Kyle
21
Engineering Analysis - iDevice
Question: Feasibility of iPhone/iDevice camera use Basis: iPhone 5 back camera 4.12mm focal length 1/3.2” sensor size Given working distance 1.5-2”, ~38-50mm Average eyeball diameter 24mm Real working distance: 62-74mm Calculated image distance: mm FOV dimensions determined from interpolated sensor size 68.6x51.4mm Much larger than eyeball diameter Need additional magnification/zoom Tom
22
Selection Criteria Low Cost Adheres to FDA/Safety Regulations
Portability Usability Reliability Diagnosable Image Adheres to FDA/Safety Regulations Patient Comfort Plausibility Cost Time Engineering Ian
23
Pugh Table - Datum 1 Highest (+) Rating Kevin Lowest (-) Rating
24
Pugh Table - Datum 2 Highest (+) Rating Kevin Lowest (-) Rating
25
Pugh Table - Datum 3 Highest (+) Rating Kevin Lowest (-) Rating
26
System Level Proposal System Power - Wall Plug
Illuminate Retina - IR then LED Flash Capture Video - Camera Display Video - External Monitor Support Head - Face down Direct Eye - Internal target Position Camera - Controlled on GUI Focus Image - Auto / on GUI Metadata - Input to GUI Connect to comp - Network/USB Package File - DICOM Kyle Some Whys: Stability Consistency Comfort
27
Risk Assessment Quang - alex leaving after first semester
28
Test Plan Dan
29
Updated Project Plan Next 3 weeks: Kyle
30
Summary Background Functional Decomposition Concept Development
Problem Statement Current Product House of Quality Functional Decomposition Concept Development Engineering Analysis System Level Proposal Risk Assessment Test Plan Updated Project Plan Kyle
31
Questions
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.