1. A Comparative Survey of Enterprise Architecture Frameworks
Jaap Schekkerman, B.Sc.
President of the Institute For Enterprise Architecture Developments (IFEAD)
Thought Leader Business Technology Strategy & Enterprise Architecture, Capgemini

2. Agenda About the speaker EA Survey 2003 Results – EA Framework Usage
EA Frameworks Comparison
Conclusion

3. Speaker Qualifications - Jaap Schekkerman
Author / Co-Author of several Architecture books & publications
Founder & President of the Institute For Enterprise Architecture Developments, The Netherlands.
Thought Leader Business Technology Strategy & Enterprise Architecture, Capgemini, The Netherlands.
Professional Associations:
Advisory board member of the Federal Enterprise Architecture Certification Institute, USA.
Co-Founder & Alliance member of the Global Enterprise Architecture Organisation, New Zealand.
Member of the 'MANYWORLDS' knowledge network of Business Thought Leaders, USA.
Member of the IEEE 1471 (Recommended Practice for Architectural Description) working group, USA.
Member of the World Wide Institute of Software Architects (WWISA), USA.
Member of the Netherlands Society of Information Architects (GIA), NL.
Member of the SWEBOK (Software Engineering Body of Knowledge) working group of the University of Québec, Montréal.
For more info about my books & publications, visit:

4. Combining EA Research & Best Practices

5. Survey Question: What kind of EA Frameworks are you using?
All Industries / Governments
All Others except the Financial & Insurance Industry
Source: EA Survey 2003, © Copyright: IFEAD
Financial & Insurance Industry
Source: EA Survey 2003, © Copyright: IFEAD
Source: EA Survey 2003, © Copyright: IFEAD

6. Enterprise Architecture Frameworks & the Holistic Perspective
Trends
Holistic Architecture: By 2006, 20% of Global 2000 organizations will integrate holistic enterprise architecture, enterprise program management, enterprise strategy/planning, and IT portfolio management into a common set of IT management processes under the auspices of the CIO’s office. Ten percent will operate these integrated management disciplines outside the IT organization.
Value of Integrated Architecture: By 2007, 50% of Global 2000 enterprises will move beyond a pure technology architecture focus to include enterprise business architecture, enterprise information architecture, and enterprise solution architecture. Architecture teams that fail to move beyond the technical focus will come under increasing pressure to demonstrate business value.
Source: META GROUP RESEARCH ~ EA TRENDS 2004 – 2005.
So, EA Frameworks has to support the holistic perspective……… and more..

7. Enterprise Architecture Frameworks History
CIMOSA
PERA
SAGA

8. Enterprise Architecture Framework (Zachman)
Characteristics:
Positioning Framework
Categorizing Deliverables
Limited usefulness EA
History in Manufacturing
Broad Acceptance
Limited Holistic Perspect.
Planning Tool

9. Integrated Architecture Framework (Capgemini)
Characteristics:
Positioning Framework
History in Enterprise Planning
Separation of Concerns
Categorizing Aspects
Limited Acceptance
Proprietary
Holistic Perspective.
Communication Tool

10. NATO Architecture Framework / C4ISR / DoDAF
Business
Organization Model
Systems
Conceptual Model
Software
Component Model
Information Flow Diagram
System Physical Model
Implementation Model
Node
Connectivity Model
Logical Model
Integration Model
Characteristics:
Positioning Framework
History in Defence
Broad Defence Acceptance
Neutral
Limited Holistic Perspective.
Process / Planning Tool

11. Extended Enterprise Architecture Framework (IFEAD)
Characteristics:
Positioning Framework
History in (Extended) Enterprise Frameworks
Focusing on Collaboration
Separation of Concerns
Broad Acceptance
Neutral / Open
Complete Holistic Perspective.
Communication Tool

12. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Open Systems Architecture (CIMOSA)
Characteristics:
Process Framework
History in Manufacturing
Focusing on Views
Definition of Models
Limited Acceptance
European Initiative
Limited Holistic Perspective
Process Planning Tool

13. The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF v8.x) Enterprise Edition
Characteristics:
Enterprise Architecture Development Methodology
History in Defence
Open Standard
Neutral
Broad Acceptance
Holistic Perspective.
Process / Planning Tool

14. US - Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework (FEAF)
Characteristics:
Enterprise Architecture Reference Framework
History in Enterprise Architecture Planning
US-Gov Standard
Broad US-Gov Acceptance
Holistic Perspective.
Planning & Communication Tool

15. US - Treasury Enterprise Architecture Framework (TEAF)
Functional
Information
Organisational
Infrastructure
Enabler
Who and Why
What, How Much, and
How Frequently
How, Where, and When
Characteristics:
Positioning Framework
History in FEAF
US-Treasury Standard
Broad US-Treasury Acceptance
Limited Holistic Perspective.
Planning & Communication Tool

16. Conclusion Most EA Frameworks have different evolutions
Most EA Frameworks serve different Purposes
Most EA Frameworks are different in Scope
Most EA Frameworks are based on different Principles
Most EA Frameworks have different Structures
Most EA Frameworks are supported by different approaches
Most EA Frameworks are different in compliancy with the Clinger Cohen Act
ISBN X
So, the Question is: Do You Create or Choose your Enterprise Architecture Framework
or or at the author