1. The Utility of Considering Dual-Pol Radar Signatures in the Tornado Warning Process
Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. and Christopher Gitro
Noaa/nws, binghamton, ny
Northeast regional operational workshop
10 december 2013

2. Outline Motivation Previous Research Methodology / Latest Results
Summary / Conclusions
Future Work

3. Motivation

4. NWS ER Tornado Warning Statistics for 2012-2013
* Tabulated for the WFO’s in our study (ALY, BGM, BOX, BTV, BUF, CAR, CTP, GYX, OKX, PBZ, and PHI)
* Total of 62 events for these offices; with 27 of them fully warned and 8 partially warned; for a POD = 0.5 (well below expected performance standards)
* FAR stats (0.79) were similarly below established goals
NWS ER Tornado Warning Statistics for

5. Previous Research

6. Drop Size Sorting / Zdr Arc
From Kumjian and Ryzhkov, 2009
From Romine, et. al, 2008
* Enhanced Kdp (blue) gets displaced left of enhanced Zdr (orange) via preferential size sorting
* Conceptual schematic of differing hydrometeor descents and Zdr arcing

7. ZH
ZDR
KDP
SRV
* EF -1 tornado was on the ground at this time (near Trinity, AL)
* Note the westward displacement of Kdp maxima (lower right) versus Zdr maxima (lower left)
* Also, note the arc- shaped configuration of the Zdr pattern (lower left)
Radar 4-Panel from Northern Alabama at 1620 UTC, 27 April 2011 (from Crowe, et. al, 2012)

8. ZH
ZDR
KDP
SRV
* EF -1 tornado was on the ground at this time (near Trinity, AL)
* Note the westward displacement of Kdp maxima (lower right) versus Zdr maxima (lower left)
* Also, note the arc- shaped configuration of the Zdr pattern (lower left)
Zdr Max
Radar 4-Panel from Northern Alabama at 1620 UTC, 27 April 2011 (from Crowe, et. al, 2012)

9. Methodology / Latest Results

10. Methodology
Favorable initial results (Crowe, et. al, 2012) were further put to the test over the Northeastern U.S. (New England, NY, PA, and NJ)
30 Storms (17 Non-tornadic and 13 Tornadic) were chosen from the 2012 and 2013 convective seasons, each within a potentially favorable synoptic environment for tornadogenesis:
ML CAPE > 700 J/kg
0-6 km Shear > 40 kt
0-1 km Shear > 20 kt
0-1 km SRH > 100 m2/s2
Many radar/storm-scale parameters were tabulated at the lowest tilt
Including specific Zdr and Kdp maximum values, and their separation distances (nmi)
AWIPS/GR2 Analyst sampling and distance measuring tools

11. Radar 4-Panel from Central New York at 2010 UTC, 26 July 2012
* EF -1 tornado was on the ground at this time (near Elmira, NY)
* Once again, note the westward displacement of Kdp maxima (lower right) versus Zdr maxima (lower left)
* Also, note the developing arc-shaped region of enhanced Zdr (lower left)
Radar 4-Panel from Central New York at 2010 UTC, 26 July 2012

12. Radar 4-Panel from Central New York at 2010 UTC, 26 July 2012
* EF -1 tornado was on the ground at this time (near Elmira, NY)
* Once again, note the westward displacement of Kdp maxima (lower right) versus Zdr maxima (lower left)
* Also, note the developing arc-shaped region of enhanced Zdr (lower left)
Zdr Maxx
Radar 4-Panel from Central New York at 2010 UTC, 26 July 2012

13. Statistical Correlations
Strongest correlations to tornadic development (either same volume scan or in the near future):
Zdr and Kdp separation (nmi) – 0.50
Maximum gate-gate shear (kt) – 0.38
Maximum SRM increase within a volume scan – 0.30
Existence/development of a Zdr arc – 0.23
Given approximately 300 data points (radar volume scans), these values are statistically significant to the 99th percentile (Gibbons, 1976)

14. * All 30 storms in the database represented
* Note the typically much larger horizontal separation for tornadic storms (red)
* For the non-tornadic storms (blue), little separation was typically seen (data points tightly clustered around the center of the plot)
Polar Plot of Kdp maxima (red for tornadic storms and blue for non-tornadic storms) versus Zdr maxima (center point)

15. Horizontal Separations (nmi, y-axis) of Zdr and Kdp maxima over time
* Looking at +/- 3 volume scans from T=0
* T=0 is either the time of initial tornado touchdown or tornado warning issuance (null events)
* Note the large differences in separation magnitude between T-2 and T=0
Horizontal Separations (nmi, y-axis) of Zdr and Kdp maxima over time

16. * Once again, looking at +/- 3 volume scans from T=0
* T=0 is either the time of initial tornado touchdown or tornado warning issuance (null events)
* Rotational velocity couplet seems to spike in intensity near T=0 for tornadic storms
Trends of Maximum Gate-Gate Shear (kt, y-axis (Storm Relative Motion)) over time

17. Summary / Conclusions

18. Take Home Points
Horizontal separation of Zdr and Kdp maxima via drop size sorting (enhanced low-level helicity) seemed to be a reliable indicator of tornadogenesis
Matches previous research well over the Southeastern U.S.
Initially promising results perhaps warrants consideration in the tornado warning process
Gate-gate shear values tend to maximize right around the time of touchdown (T=0) in tornadic storms
Although there was a general tendency for Zdr arc formation in Northeast U.S. tornadic storms, drop size sorting appeared to be the more readily apparent phenomenon via radar interrogation

19. Future Work Publish results
Develop methods to make Zdr/Kdp separations easier to recognize in real-time
Continue to evaluate these processes in coming convective seasons

20. Questions ?