1. Economics N. Gregory Mankiw & Mohamed H. Rashwan Principles of
Arab World Edition

2. In this chapter, look for the answers to these questions:
How does the interest-rate effect help explain the slope of the aggregate-demand curve?
How can the central bank use monetary policy to shift the AD curve?
In what two ways does fiscal policy affect aggregate demand?
What are the arguments for and against using policy to try to stabilize the economy?

3. Introduction Earlier chapters covered:
Earlier chapters covered:
the long-run effects of fiscal policy on interest rates, investment, economic growth
the long-run effects of monetary policy on the price level and inflation rate
This chapter focuses on the short-run effects of fiscal and monetary policy, which work through aggregate demand. 2

4. Aggregate Demand
Recall, the AD curve slopes downward for three reasons:
The wealth effect
The interest-rate effect
The exchange-rate effect
Next: A supply-demand model that helps explain the interest-rate effect and how monetary policy affects aggregate demand. 3

5. The Theory of Liquidity Preference
A simple theory of the interest rate (denoted r)
r adjusts to balance supply and demand for money
Money supply: assume fixed by central bank, does not depend on interest rate 4

6. The Theory of Liquidity Preference
Money demand reflects how much wealth people want to hold in liquid form.
For simplicity, suppose household wealth includes only two assets:
Money – liquid but pays no interest
Bonds – pay interest but not as liquid
A household’s “money demand” reflects its preference for liquidity.
The variables that influence money demand: Y, r, and P.
To understand the interest-rate effect and how monetary policy shifts AD, students will need to know how money demand depends on r and P.
The dependence of money demand on Y is not directly needed here (though it becomes important in the discussion of the crowding-out effect later in this chapter).
But if you omit Y from the discussion, students will have trouble understanding why an increase in P causes an increase in money demand. They will think that an increase in P reduces demand for g&s, so people will need less money, not more. In that line of reasoning, students are not holding real income constant.
But this is easily corrected: Explain to your students that real income is what determines the quantity of g&s households want to buy, and P only determines the number of dollars needed to buy that quantity of g&s.
(Notes continued on next slide.) 5

7. Money Demand
Suppose real income (Y) rises. Other things equal, what happens to money demand?
If Y rises:
Households want to buy more g&s,
so they need more money.
To get this money, they attempt to sell some of their bonds.
I.e., an increase in Y causes an increase in money demand, other things equal.
This slide asks “how does money demand depend on Y?” and provides the answer.
The following slides ask how money demand depends on r and P and does not provide the answers, but asks students to figure out the answers themselves. 6

8. ACTIVE LEARNING 1 The determinants of money demand
A. Suppose r rises, but Y and P are unchanged. What happens to money demand? B. Suppose P rises, but Y and r are unchanged. What happens to money demand?
You may be reluctant to allocate class time to this activity, when you could much more quickly just give them the answers. But students will learn these concepts better if they have to figure them out.
Consider having students work in pairs: each student can “test” his or her answer on the other student, and students can pick apart each other’s answers until they are comfortable that they have the correct reasoning. This is a very effective learning experience.
I suggest allowing 4 minutes of class time for students to formulate their answers.
(To motivate students to actually work on the questions during these 4 minutes, you might tell them these questions appeared on exams you have given in this course in the past.)
During these four minutes, circulate around the room, not only to make yourself available in case any students need help getting started, but also to get a sense of how well students are “getting it.”
© 2015 Cengage Learning EMEA. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

9. ACTIVE LEARNING 1 Answers
A. Suppose r rises, but Y and P are unchanged. What happens to money demand?
r is the opportunity cost of holding money.
An increase in r reduces money demand: households attempt to buy bonds to take advantage of the higher interest rate.
Hence, an increase in r causes a decrease in money demand, other things equal.
© 2015 Cengage Learning EMEA. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

10. ACTIVE LEARNING 1 Answers
B. Suppose P rises, but Y and r are unchanged. What happens to money demand?
If Y is unchanged, people will want to buy the same amount of g&s.
Since P is higher, they will need more money to do so.
Hence, an increase in P causes an increase in money demand, other things equal.
© 2015 Cengage Learning EMEA. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

11. Quantity fixed by the Fed
How r Is Determined M
Interest rate
MS curve is vertical: Changes in r do not affect MS, which is fixed by the central bank.
MD curve is downward sloping: A fall in r increases money demand. MS
MD1 r1
Eq’m interest rate
As in previous chapters,
MS = Money Supply
MD = Money Demand
Quantity fixed by the Fed 10

12. How the Interest-Rate Effect Works
A fall in P reduces money demand, which lowers r. M
Interest rate Y P MS
MD1 AD r1
MD2 P1 Y1 r2 P2 Y2
This graph replicates Figure 2 in the textbook but with one difference. Figure 2 shows the effects of an increase in P on interest rates and on the quantity of real GDP demanded. For the sake of variety, this slide shows the effects of a decrease in P.
In the preceding exercise, students figured out that an increase in P causes an increase in money demand. Of course, the converse is true: a decrease in P causes a decrease in money demand, which shifts the money demand curve left as shown in the graph on the left.
As the book explains, the fall in the interest rate reduces the cost of borrowing, so it stimulates investment—firms borrow more money (or sell more bonds, or issue more stock) to finance investment projects, and households borrow more money to buy new houses.
One thing the book does not emphasize that also might be relevant is that a portion of consumption responds to the interest rate, particularly spending on autos and other big-ticket purchases that people usually finance.
A fall in r increases I and the quantity of g&s demanded. 11

13. Monetary Policy and Aggregate Demand
To achieve macroeconomic goals, the central bank can use monetary policy to shift the AD curve.
The central bank’s policy instrument is MS.
The central bank targets the interest rate, which banks charge each other on short-term loans
To change the interest rate and shift the AD curve, the central bank conducts open market operations to change MS. 12

14. The Effects of Reducing the Money Supply
The central bank can raise r by reducing the money supply. M
Interest rate Y P
MS2
MS1
AD1 MD r2
AD2 P1 Y1 Y2 r1
This graph replicates Figure 3 in the textbook but with one difference. Figure 3 shows the effects of an increase in the money supply. This slide shows the effects of a decrease in the money supply for the sake of variety.
It’s important for students to see that the contraction of the money supply and subsequent interest rate hike reduces the quantity of g&s demanded at each price level. Hence, the AD curve shifts left.
An increase in r reduces the quantity of g&s demanded. 13

15. ACTIVE LEARNING 2 Monetary policy
For each of the events below, - determine the short-run effects on output - determine how the central bank should adjust the money supply and interest rates to stabilize output A. Government tries to balance the budget by cutting govt spending. B. A stock market boom increases household wealth.
This exercise gets students to apply the preceding material on monetary policy and the aggregate demand curve. Determining the correct answers requires students to integrate this material with what they learned in the preceding chapter on the effects of events that shift aggregate demand or aggregate supply.
Most students will not find this exercise difficult.
For each event, assume the economy was initially in a long-run equilibrium before the event occurs.
© 2015 Cengage Learning EMEA. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

16. ACTIVE LEARNING 2 Answers
A. Congress tries to balance the budget by cutting govt spending.
This event would reduce agg demand and output.
To stabilize output, the Fed should increase MS and reduce r to increase agg demand.
© 2015 Cengage Learning EMEA. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

17. ACTIVE LEARNING 2 Answers
B. A stock market boom increases household wealth.
This event would increase agg demand, raising output above its natural rate.
To stabilize output, the Fed should reduce MS and increase r to reduce agg demand.
After displaying the answer, you might ask students “Why would the Fed want to counteract an event that raises output and employment?”
Indeed, some students may be wondering exactly this question.
If so, you can explain that the model they learned in the preceding chapter shows that output and employment cannot remain above their natural rates for long, because prices start rising and SRAS shifts up. In the end, output and employment are back at their natural rates, but prices are permanently higher.
Better yet, don’t explain it. See if you can get another student to provide the correct explanation.
© 2015 Cengage Learning EMEA. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

18. Liquidity traps
Monetary policy stimulates aggregate demand by reducing the interest rate.
Liquidity trap: when the interest rate is zero
In a liquidity trap, mon. policy may not work, since nominal interest rates cannot be reduced further.
However, central bank can make real interest rates negative by raising inflation expectations.
Also, central bank can conduct open-market ops using other assets—like mortgages and corporate debt—thereby lowering rates on these kinds of loans.
This slide corresponds to a new FYI box entitled “The Zero Lower Bound.”

19. Fiscal Policy and Aggregate Demand
Fiscal policy: the setting of the level of govt spending and taxation by govt policymakers
Expansionary fiscal policy
an increase in G and/or decrease in T
shifts AD right
Contractionary fiscal policy
a decrease in G and/or increase in T
shifts AD left
Fiscal policy has two effects on AD... 18

20. 1. The Multiplier Effect
If the govt buys $20b of planes from Boeing, Boeing’s revenue increases by $20b.
This is distributed to Boeing’s workers (as wages) and owners (as profits or stock dividends).
These people are also consumers and will spend a portion of the extra income.
This extra consumption causes further increases in aggregate demand.
Notation: $20b = $20 billion
Multiplier effect: the additional shifts in AD that result when fiscal policy increases income and thereby increases consumer spending 19

21. 1. The Multiplier Effect
A $20b increase in G initially shifts AD to the right by $20b.
The increase in Y causes C to rise, which shifts AD further to the right. Y P
AD3
AD2
AD1 P1 Y1 Y2 Y3
$20 billion 20

22. Marginal Propensity to Consume
How big is the multiplier effect? It depends on how much consumers respond to increases in income.
Marginal propensity to consume (MPC): the fraction of extra income that households consume rather than save
E.g., if MPC = 0.8 and income rises $100, C rises $80. 21

23. A Formula for the Multiplier
Notation: G is the change in G, Y and C are the ultimate changes in Y and C
Y = C + I + G + NX identity
Y = C + G I and NX do not change
Y = MPC Y + G because C = MPC Y
solved for Y
This slide uses simple algebra to derive a formula for the simple spending multiplier.
If you do not wish to cover this derivation, you can skip to the next slide, which just shows the formula for the multiplier. However, you will need to explain the “delta” notation, as the formula on the next slide includes the terms G and Y.
The multiplier 1
1 – MPC
Y = G 22

24. A Formula for the Multiplier
The size of the multiplier depends on MPC.
E.g., if MPC = 0.5 multiplier = 2
if MPC = multiplier = 4
if MPC = 0.9 multiplier = 10
A bigger MPC means changes in Y cause bigger changes in C, which in turn cause more changes in Y. 1
1 – MPC
Y = G
The multiplier
If you skipped the previous slide, which shows the algebraic derivation of the multiplier, then you may need to explain the delta notation to students. 23

25. Other Applications of the Multiplier Effect
The multiplier effect: Each $1 increase in G can generate more than a $1 increase in agg demand.
Also true for the other components of GDP.
Example: Suppose a recession overseas reduces demand for Jordanian net exports by $10b.
Initially, agg demand falls by $10b.
The fall in Y causes C to fall, which further reduces agg demand and income. 24

26. 2. The Crowding-Out Effect
Fiscal policy has another effect on AD that works in the opposite direction.
A fiscal expansion raises r,
which reduces investment,
which reduces the net increase in agg demand.
So, the size of the AD shift may be smaller than the initial fiscal expansion.
This is called the crowding-out effect. 25

27. How the Crowding-Out Effect Works
A $20b increase in G initially shifts AD right by $20b M
Interest rate Y P MS
MD2
AD2
AD3 r2
MD1
AD1 P1 Y1 Y3 Y2 r1
$20 billion
This graph replicates Figure 5 in the textbook.
Note: This graph demonstrates the crowding-out effect in isolation, ignoring the multiplier effect.
But higher Y increases MD and r, which reduces AD. 26

28. Changes in Taxes A tax cut increases households’ take-home pay.
A tax cut increases households’ take-home pay.
Households respond by spending a portion of this extra income, shifting AD to the right.
The size of the shift is affected by the multiplier and crowding-out effects.
Another factor: whether households perceive the tax cut to be temporary or permanent.
A permanent tax cut causes a bigger increase in C—and a bigger shift in the AD curve—than a temporary tax cut.
The textbook gives a nice example: the first President Bush reduced federal income tax withholding to stimulate consumer spending to combat the recession. However, this was just a temporary reallocation of tax liability and, consequently, had a very small affect on aggregate demand. See the textbook for more details. 27

29. ACTIVE LEARNING 3 Fiscal policy effects
The economy is in recession. Shifting the AD curve rightward by $200b would end the recession.
A. If MPC = .8 and there is no crowding out, how much should the government increase G to end the recession?
B. If there is crowding out, will the government need to increase G more or less than this amount?
This exercise gets students to apply the preceding material on the effects of fiscal policy on aggregate demand.
Finding the answers requires students use the formula for the multiplier but does not require that students understand the algebraic derivation of this formula.
© 2015 Cengage Learning EMEA. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

30. ACTIVE LEARNING 3 Answers
The economy is in recession. Shifting the AD curve rightward by $200b would end the recession.
A. If MPC = .8 and there is no crowding out, how much should the government increase G to end the recession?
Multiplier = 1/(1 – .8) = 5
Increase G by $40b to shift agg demand by 5 x $40b = $200b.
© 2015 Cengage Learning EMEA. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

31. ACTIVE LEARNING 3 Answers
The economy is in recession. Shifting the AD curve rightward by $200b would end the recession.
B. If there is crowding out, will government need to increase G more or less than this amount?
Crowding out reduces the impact of G on AD.
To offset this, government should increase G by a larger amount.
© 2015 Cengage Learning EMEA. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

32. Fiscal Policy and Aggregate Supply
Most economists believe the short-run effects of fiscal policy mainly work through agg demand.
But fiscal policy might also affect agg supply.
Recall one of the Ten Principles from Chapter 1: People respond to incentives.
A cut in the tax rate gives workers incentive to work more, so it might increase the quantity of g&s supplied and shift AS to the right.
People who believe this effect is large are called “Supply-siders.”
This slide and the next discuss material from the FYI box entitled “How Fiscal Policy Might Affect Aggregate Supply.” These two slides may be omitted without loss of continuity.
The tax rate cut, other things equal, would reduce government revenue. But other things aren’t equal: as the textbook explains, the rightward shift in AS increases income, which, in turn increases the tax base. Some supply-siders believe that the increase in income and the tax base are so large that a tax rate cut ends up INCREASING tax revenue rather than decreasing it.
This is a theoretical possibility but does not have much empirical support. Most economists and policymakers believe that a tax rate cut causes revenue to fall, even if it stimulates additional economic activity.
There’s a very nice discussion of supply-side economics and the Laffer Curve toward the end of the chapter entitled “Application: The Costs of Taxation.” This chapter appears as Chapter 8 in every version of the textbook except Brief Principles of Macroeconomics. 31

33. Fiscal Policy and Aggregate Supply
Govt purchases might affect agg supply. Example:
Govt increases spending on roads.
Better roads may increase business productivity, which increases the quantity of g&s supplied, shifts AS to the right.
This effect is probably more relevant in the long run: it takes time to build the new roads and put them into use.
Other examples of public capital for which this effect might be relevant: bridges and human capital expenditures such as public education or subsidies for college education. 32

34. Using Policy to Stabilize the Economy
In the U.S., since the Employment Act of 1946, economic stabilization has been a goal of U.S. policy.
Economists debate how active a role the govt should take to stabilize the economy. 33

35. The Case for Active Stabilization Policy
Keynes: “Animal spirits” cause waves of pessimism and optimism among households and firms, leading to shifts in aggregate demand and fluctuations in output and employment.
Also, other factors cause fluctuations, e.g.,
booms and recessions abroad
stock market booms and crashes
If policymakers do nothing, these fluctuations are destabilizing to businesses, workers, consumers. 34

36. The Case for Active Stabilization Policy
Proponents of active stabilization policy believe the govt should use policy to reduce these fluctuations:
When GDP falls below its natural rate, use expansionary monetary or fiscal policy to prevent or reduce a recession.
When GDP rises above its natural rate, use contractionary policy to prevent or reduce an inflationary boom. 35

37. The Case Against Active Stabilization Policy
Monetary policy affects economy with a long lag:
Firms make investment plans in advance, so I takes time to respond to changes in r.
Most economists believe it takes at least 6 months for mon policy to affect output and employment.
Fiscal policy also works with a long lag:
For example, in the U.S., changes in G and T require acts of government.
The legislative process can take months or years.
The legislative process can be quite lengthy.
A bill is introduced in government, debated, amended, and voted on in each chamber of Congress. The House and the Senate must reconcile any differences, and the reconciled bill must pass a vote in both chambers. Then, the President must sign the bill into law.
In addition to the time it takes for this process to occur, there are often compromises made along the way for political reasons. So, many people have trouble imagining that fiscal policy could be used in an active way to respond to shocks as they occur. 36

38. The Case Against Active Stabilization Policy
Due to these long lags, critics of active policy argue that such policies may destabilize the economy rather than help it:
By the time the policies affect agg demand, the economy’s condition may have changed.
These critics contend that policymakers should focus on long-run goals like economic growth and low inflation. 37

39. Automatic Stabilizers
Automatic stabilizers: changes in fiscal policy that stimulate agg demand when economy goes into recession, without policymakers having to take any deliberate action 38

40. Automatic Stabilizers: Examples
The tax system
In recession, taxes fall automatically, which stimulates agg demand.
Govt spending
In recession, more people apply for public assistance (welfare, unemployment insurance).
Govt spending on these programs automatically rises, which stimulates agg demand. 39

41. CONCLUSION
Policymakers need to consider all the effects of their actions. For example,
When government cuts taxes, it should consider the short-run effects on agg demand and employment, and the long-run effects on saving and growth.
When the central bank reduces the rate of money growth, it must take into account not only the long-run effects on inflation but the short-run effects on output and employment. 40

42. SUMMARY
In the theory of liquidity preference, the interest rate adjusts to balance the demand for money with the supply of money.
The interest-rate effect helps explain why the aggregate-demand curve slopes downward: an increase in the price level raises money demand, which raises the interest rate, which reduces investment, which reduces the aggregate quantity of goods & services demanded.
© 2015 Cengage Learning EMEA. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

43. SUMMARY
An increase in the money supply causes the interest rate to fall, which stimulates investment and shifts the aggregate demand curve rightward.
Expansionary fiscal policy—a spending increase or tax cut—shifts aggregate demand to the right. Contractionary fiscal policy shifts aggregate demand to the left.
© 2015 Cengage Learning EMEA. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

44. SUMMARY
When the government alters spending or taxes, the resulting shift in aggregate demand can be larger or smaller than the fiscal change:
The multiplier effect tends to amplify the effects of fiscal policy on aggregate demand.
The crowding-out effect tends to dampen the effects of fiscal policy on aggregate demand.
© 2015 Cengage Learning EMEA. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

45. SUMMARY
Economists disagree about how actively policymakers should try to stabilize the economy.
Some argue that the government should use fiscal and monetary policy to combat destabilizing fluctuations in output and employment.
Others argue that policy will end up destabilizing the economy because policies work with long lags.
© 2015 Cengage Learning EMEA. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.