Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Quarks Þ strangeness Over the years inquiring minds have asked:

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Quarks Þ strangeness Over the years inquiring minds have asked:"— Presentation transcript:

1 Quarks Þ strangeness Over the years inquiring minds have asked:
P Spring 2002 L8 Quarks Richard Kass Over the years inquiring minds have asked: “Can we describe the known physics with just a few building blocks ?” Þ Historically the answer has been yes. Elements of Mendeleev’s Periodic Table (chemistry) nucleus of atom made of protons, neutrons proton and neutron really same “particle” (different isotopic spin) By 1950’s there was evidence for many new particles beyond g, e, p, n It was realized that even these new particles fit certain patterns: pions: p+(140 MeV) p-(140 MeV) po(135 MeV) kaons: k+(496 MeV) k-(496 MeV) ko(498 MeV) Some sort of pattern was emerging, but lots of questions Þ If mass difference between proton neutrons, pions, and kaons is due to electromagnetism then how come: Mn > Mp and Mko > Mk+ but Mp+ > Mpo Lots of models concocted to try to explain why these particles exist: Þ Model of Fermi and Yang (late 1940’s-early 50’s): pion is composed of nucleons and anti-nucleons (used SU(2) symmetry) note this model was proposed before discovery of anti-proton ! With the discovery of new unstable particles (L, k) a new quantum number was invented: Þ strangeness

2 Mn > Mp and Mko > Mk+ and Mp+ > Mpo
P Spring 2002 L8 Quarks Richard Kass Gell-Mann, Nakano, Nishijima realized that electric charge (Q) of all particles could be related to isospin (3rd component), Baryon number (B) and Strangeness (S): Q = I3 +(S + B)/2= I3 +Y/2 Coin the name hypercharge (Y) for (S+B) Interesting patterns started to emerge when I3 was plotted vs. Y: Particle Model of Sakata (mid 50’s): used Q = I3 +(S + B)/2 assumed that all particles could be made from a combination of p,n, L tried to use SU(3) symmetry In this model: This model obeys Fermi statistics and explains why: Mn > Mp and Mko > Mk+ and Mp+ > Mpo Unfortunately, the model had major problems….

3 Quarks Problems with Sakata’s Model:
P Spring 2002 L8 Quarks Richard Kass Problems with Sakata’s Model: Why should the p, n, and L be the fundamental objects ? why not pions and/or kaons This model did not have the proper group structure for SU(3) What do we mean by “group structure” ? SU(n)= (nxn) Unitary matrices (MT*M=1) with determinant = 1 (=Special) and n=simplest non-trivial matrix representation Example: With 2 fundamental objects obeying SU(2) (e.g. n and p) We can combine these objects using 1 quantum number (e.g. isospin) Get 3 Isospin 1 states that are symmetric under interchange of n and p: |11> =|1/2 1/2> |1/2 1/2> |1-1> =|1/2 -1/2> |1/2 -1/2> |10> = [1/Ö2](|1/2 1/2> |1/2 -1/2> + |1/2 -1/2> |1/2 1/2>) Get 1 Isospin state that is anti-symmetric under interchange of n and p |00> = [1/Ö2](|1/2 1/2> |1/2 -1/2> - |1/2 -1/2> |1/2 1/2>) In group theory we have 2 multiplets, a 3 and a 1: 2 Ä 2 = 3 Å1 Back to Sakata's model: For SU(3) there are 2 quantum numbers and the group structure is more complicated: 3 Ä 3 Ä 3 = 1 Å 8 Å 8 Å 10 Expect 4 multiplets (groups of similar particles) with either 1, 8, or 10 members. Sakata’s model said that the p, n, and L were a multiplet which does not fit into the above scheme of known particles! (e.g. could not account for So, S+)

4 P Spring 2002 L8 Early 1960’s Quarks Richard Kass “Three Quarks for Muster Mark”, J. Joyce, Finnegan’s Wake Model was developed by: Gell-Mann, Zweig, Okubo, and Ne’eman (Salam) Three fundamental building blocks 1960’s (p,n,l) Þ 1970’s (u,d,s) mesons are bound states of a of quark and anti-quark: Can make up "wavefunctions" by combing quarks: baryons are bound state of 3 quarks: proton = (uud), neutron = (udd), L= (uds) anti-baryons are bound states of 3 anti-quarks: These quark objects are: point like spin 1/2 fermions parity = +1 (-1 for anti-quarks) two quarks are in isospin doublet (u and d), s is an iso-singlet (=0) Obey Q = I3 +1/2(S+B) = I3 +Y/2 Group Structure is SU(3) For every quark there is an anti-quark quarks feel all interactions (have mass, electric charge, etc)

5 Early 1960’s Quarks Successes of 1960’s Quark Model:
P Spring 2002 L8 Early 1960’s Quarks Richard Kass The additive quark quantum numbers are given below: Quantum # u d s c b t electric charge 2/3 -1/3 -1/3 2/3 -1/3 2/3 I3 1/2 -1/ Strangeness Charm bottom top Baryon number 1/3 1/3 1/3 1/3 1/3 1/3 Lepton number Successes of 1960’s Quark Model: Classify all known (in the early 1960’s) particles in terms of 3 building blocks predict new particles (e.g. W-) explain why certain particles don’t exist (e.g. baryons with S = +1) explain mass splitting between meson and baryons explain/predict magnetic moments of mesons and baryons explain/predict scattering cross sections (e.g. spp/spp = 2/3) Failures of the 1960's model: No evidence for free quarks (fixed up by QCD) Pauli principle violated (D++= uuu wavefunction is totally symmetric) (fixed up by color) What holds quarks together in a proton ? (gluons!) How many different types of quarks exist ? (6?)

6 Dynamic Quarks Dynamic Quark Model (mid 70’s to now!)
P Spring 2002 L8 Dynamic Quarks Richard Kass Dynamic Quark Model (mid 70’s to now!) Theory of quark-quark interaction Þ QCD includes gluons Successes of Quark Model (QCD): “Real” Field Theory i.e. Gluons instead of photons Color instead of electric charge explains why no free quarks Þ confinement of quarks calculate lifetimes of baryons, mesons Failures/problems of the model: Hard to do calculations in QCD (non-perturbative) Polarization of hadrons (e.g. L’s) in high energy collisions How many quarks are there ? Historical note: Original quark model assumed approximate SU(3) for the quarks. Once charm quark was discovered SU(4) was considered. But SU(4) is a badly “broken” symmetry. Standard Model puts quarks in SU(2) doublet, COLOR exact SU(3) symmetry.

7 From Quarks to Particles
P Spring 2002 L8 Richard Kass From Quarks to Particles How do we "construct" baryons and mesons from quarks ? Use SU(3) as the group (1960’s model) This group has 8 generators (n2-1, n=3) Each generator is a 3x3 linearly independent traceless hermitian matrices Only 2 of the generators are diagonal Þ 2 quantum numbers Hypercharge = Strangeness + Baryon number = Y Isospin (I3) In this model (1960’s) there are 3 quarks, which are the eigenvectors (3 row column vector) of the two diagonal generators (Y and I3) Baryons are made up of a bound state of 3 quarks Mesons are a quark-antiquark bound state The quarks are added together to form mesons and baryons using the rules of SU(3). M&S P It is interesting to plot Y vs. I3 for quarks and anti-quarks:

8 Making Mesons with Quarks
P Spring 2002 L8 Making Mesons with Quarks Richard Kass Making mesons with (orbital angular momentum L=0) The properties of SU(3) tell us how many mesons to expect: Thus we expect an octet with 8 particles and a singlet with 1 particle. If SU(3) were a perfect symmetry then all particles in a multiplet would have the same mass.

9 Baryon Octet Making Baryons (orbital angular momentum L=0).
P Spring 2002 L8 Baryon Octet Richard Kass Making Baryons (orbital angular momentum L=0). Now must combine 3 quarks together: Expect a singlet, 2 octets, and a decuplet (10 particles) Þ 27 objects total. Octet with J=1/2:

10 Baryon Decuplet Baryon Decuplet (J=3/2) Expect 10 states.
P Spring 2002 L8 Baryon Decuplet Richard Kass Baryon Decuplet (J=3/2) Expect 10 states. Prediction of the W- (mass =1672 MeV/c2, S=-3) Use bubble chamber to find the event. 1969 Nobel Prize to Gell-Mann! “Observation of a hyperon with strangeness minus 3” PRL V12, 1964.

11 Quarks and Vector Mesons
P Spring 2002 L8 Quarks and Vector Mesons Richard Kass Leptonic Decays of Vector Mesons What is the experimental evidence that quarks have non-integer charge ? Þ Both the mass splitting of baryons and mesons and baryon magnetic moments depend on (e/m) not e. Some quark models with integer charge quarks (e.g. Han-Nambu) were also successful in explaining mass patterns of mesons and baryons. Need a quantity that can be measured that depends only on electric charge ! Consider the vector mesons (V=r, w, f, y, U): quark-antiquark bound states with: mass ¹ 0 electric charge = 0 orbital angular momentum (L) =0 spin = 1 charge parity (C) = -1 parity = -1 strangeness = charm = bottom=top = 0 These particles have the same quantum numbers as the photon. The vector mesons can be produced by its coupling to a photon: e+e- ® g ® V e.g. : e+e- ® g ® Y(1S) or y The vector mesons can decay by its coupling to a photon: V® g ® e+e- e.g. : r® g ® e+e- (BR=6x10-5) or y®g ® e+e- (BR=6.3x10-2)

12 Quarks and Vector Mesons
P Spring 2002 L8 Quarks and Vector Mesons Richard Kass The decay rate (or partial width) for a vector meson to decay to leptons is: The Van Royen- Weisskopf Formula In the above MV is the mass of the vector meson, the sum is over the amplitudes that make up the meson, Q is the charge of the quarks and y(0) is the wavefunction for the two quarks to overlap each other. meson quarks |SaiQi|2 GL(exp) GL(exp) |SaiQi|-2 If we assume that |y(o)|2/M2 is the same for r, w, f, (good assumption since masses are 770 MeV, 780 MeV, and 1020 MeV respectively) then: expect: GL(r) : GL(w) : GL(f) = 9 : 1 : 2 measure: (8.8 ± 2.6) : 1 : (1.7 ± 0.4) Good agreement!


Download ppt "Quarks Þ strangeness Over the years inquiring minds have asked:"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google