Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Paediatric Renal Transplantation

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Paediatric Renal Transplantation"— Presentation transcript:

1 Paediatric Renal Transplantation
Thank you for asking me to talk about our experience of paediatric renal transplantation at Yorkhill. Dr Heather Maxwell Consultant Paediatric Nephrologist Royal Hospital for Sick Children Glasgow

2 Paediatric Renal Transplantation
Background information Outcome of transplantation Work up for transplantation Access to transplantation

3 Renal Transplantation
First human to human renal transplant was in 1933 The first successful adult renal transplant was performed in Boston in 1954 in twins First paediatric renal transplant performed in 1959 from identical twin sister First in Yorkhill was 1977 and 204 transplants have now been performed since

4 Paediatric Renal Transplant Outcome
Patient survival Graft survival Parameters of Growth BP Haemoglobin Factors affecting outcome RHSC Audits NHSBT ODT (UKT) Centre-specific data Cohort studies 20 year review of paediatric renal Tx Renal Registry

5 Paediatric Renal Transplant Program RHSC Glasgow

6 Results of Audit from 1990’s
High incidence of vascular thromboses Lower graft survival data than expected Change in practice Joint adult transplant and paediatric urologists Multi-disciplinary team approach Transplant work-up and protocol

7 Paediatric Renal Transplant Program RHSC Glasgow

8 UK Paediatric Renal Transplant Data
DECEASED DONOR LIVING DONOR Jan 2005 – Dec 2009 Patient Survival 1yr 99% (97-100) Graft Survival 1yr 94% (90-96) 97% (94-98) Jan 2001 – Dec 2005 Patient Survival 5yrs 97% (94-99) Graft Survival 5yrs 81% (77-85) 91% (86-94) However what can our patients expect when they receive a renal transplant? NHSBT

9 RHSC Glasgow Data NHSBT

10 RHSC Audit Female 37% Male 63% 37 LRD (46%) 43 DD (54%)

11 Cause of Renal Failure

12 RHSC Audit

13 RHSC Audit - Outcome

14 Audit Higher incidence of graft thrombosis and vascular complications than expected Particularly with LRD transplants M&M reviews Small number of transplants High risk patients

15 RHSC Audit Surgical Complications
N=52 N=28 N=29 Haematoma 4 (8%) 2 (7%) 1 (3%) Lymphocoele 3 (6%) 1 (2%) Ureteric Problems 4 (14%) AV Fistula Thrombosis 4 (14%)* Kinked Renal vein Re-exploration 6 (12%) 6 (21%) 8 (28%) * 3 grafts lost

16 RHSC Audit Medical Complications
N=52 N=28 N=29 Rejection Episodes 18 (35%) 8 (29%) 3 (10%) * Infections 14 (27%) 3 (11%) 5 (17%) PTLD 6 (12%) Diabetes 5 (10%) 1 CAN 1 (4%) Recurrence of FSGS * 16 (55%) biopsied

17 Current Immunosuppression
Tacrolimus Mycophenolate Mofitil Treatment Arm Daclizumab Prednisolone for 5 days Control Arm Standard prednisolone Treatment Arm Control Graft Survival 97% BPAR 10% 7% Growth 0.17SD 0.04SD Adverse Glucose Metabolism 3% 16% Grenda et al, 2010

18 Probability of First Rejection at 12 Months
Rejection Rate Probability of First Rejection at 12 Months Transplant Year LIVING DONOR DECEASED DONOR % SE 54.1 1.7 69.3 1.4 45.8 1.5 61.0 33.6 1.3 42.5 1.6 22.9 26.9 13.7 17.9 As an example… Reduced ARR is associated with better graft survival and better graft function NAPRTCS Report 2007

19 RHSC Audit - Outcome

20 Audit Higher incidence of graft thrombosis and vascular complications than expected Particularly with LRD transplants M&M reviews Small number of transplants High risk patients Internal and external review Change in practice – smaller group of surgeons involved

21 Factors Affecting Outcome of Paediatric Renal Transplantation

22 Factors Affecting Outcome of Paediatric Renal Transplantation
An analysis of deceased donor paediatric renal transplants performed in the UK between 1986 and 1995 found that extremes of donor age, young recipient age and poor HLA matching were the major factors which adversely affected transplant outcome Avoided transplants in the very young Only used donors aged 5-50 years Better matching Postlethwaite et al, 2002

23 UKT Study To investigate the influence of a variety of factors on five-year renal transplant survival in a more recent cohort of paediatric recipients To compare risk-adjusted outcome of adult and paediatric recipients at five years post-transplant 7946 transplants (596 paediatric & 7350 adult) WTC 2006 Maxwell et al, 2006

24 Methods Cox regression analysis of factors influencing five-year transplant survival (time from transplant to earlier of graft failure or patient death) Factors considered in the analysis: Donor factors Recipient factors Other factors Age Age match Cause of death Primary renal disease HLA Ethnicity Registration waiting time Shipping Gender Kidney damage CMV Graft year Sensitisation Residual sensitisation

25 Methods Cox regression analysis of factors influencing five-year transplant survival (time from transplant to earlier of graft failure or patient death) Factors considered in the analysis: Donor factors Recipient factors Other factors Age Age match Cause of death Primary renal disease HLA Ethnicity Registration waiting time Shipping Gender Kidney damage CMV Graft year Sensitisation Residual sensitisation

26 Summary Significant year-on-year improvement in transplant outcome of paediatric patients

27 5-year transplant survival of paediatric patients by year of transplant

28 Improved Acute Graft Survival
Better pre-transplant management Improved anaesthetic and operative care Better organ selection Size Matching Use of more living donors Organ preservation and reduced cold ischaemia time (<20hours) Reduced acute rejection Reduced incidence of infection Some of these are evidence based others are more difficult to prove

29 Summary Significant year-on-year improvement in transplant outcome of paediatric patients Very young donors (0 – 10 years) and donors aged over 40 years confer the greatest risk of transplant failure in paediatric patients

30 5-year transplant survival of paediatric patients by donor age group

31 Summary Significant year-on-year improvement in transplant outcome of paediatric patients Very young donors (0 – 10 years) and donors aged over 40 years confer the greatest risk of transplant failure in paediatric patients Glomerulonephritis is associated with poorer outcome than other primary renal diseases

32 5-year transplant survival of paediatric patients by primary renal disease group

33 Summary Significant year-on-year improvement in transplant outcome of paediatric patients Very young donors (0 – 10 years) and donors aged over 40 years confer the greatest risk of transplant failure in paediatric patients Glomerulonephritis is associated with poorer outcome than other primary renal diseases Risk of transplant failure associated with adolescents (14 – 17 years) similar to that for recipients aged over 60 years

34 5-year transplant survival by recipient age – all patients

35 5-year transplant survival
by recipient age

36 2006 Allocation Scheme Increased availability of well-matched organs for children Improved access for long waiters Increased access for homozygous patients Reduce shipping times Still use deceased donors 5-50yrs Paediatric donors would no longer preferentially given to paediatric recipients Avoid very small recipients

37

38 UK PAEDIATRIC KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION:
A 20-YEAR REVIEW Lisa Mumford, Jane Tizard On behalf of the Kidney Advisory Group Paediatric Subgroup

39 Deceased and living paediatric kidney only transplants
Number of transplants Year of graft

40 Deceased donors aged between 5 and 50 years
Number of donors Year of donation

41 Donor age of deceased paediatric kidney only transplants
Year of graft

42 HLA mismatch levels of deceased paediatric kidney only transplant patients
Proportion of transplants Year of graft

43 HLA mismatch levels of deceased paediatric kidney only transplant patients

44 Waiting times of UK deceased paediatric kidney only transplants
Waiting time (days) Year of graft

45 Waiting Times for Listed Patients
2000 – 2002: median 153 days (95% CI: ) 2003 – 2005 median 264 days (95% CI: ) 2006 – 2008 median 374 days (95% CI: ) In terms of the impact of the 2006 scheme on equity for paediatric patients, the number on the transplant list and the median waiting time have remained unchanged while the number of transplants for long-waiting patients has increased as a result of a change made in April 2008 such that only 3% of listed patients have been waiting in excess of 3 years compared to 12% in December 2005.

46 Waiting times of deceased paediatric kidney only transplants

47 2010 34% ethnic minority patients registered on transplant list
Recipient ethnicity of deceased paediatric kidney only transplant patients Proportion of transplants % ethnic minority patients registered on transplant list Year of graft

48 2010 48% patients with cRF 11-100 registered on transplant list
Sensitisation (cRF) of first deceased paediatric kidney only transplant patients Proportion of transplants % patients with cRF registered on transplant list Year of graft

49 Sensitisation (cRF) of first deceased paediatric kidney only transplant patients

50 Cold ischaemia time (hours) of DBD paediatric kidney only transplants
Year of graft

51 Cold ischaemia time (hours) of DBD paediatric kidney only transplants

52 Reported immunosuppression following deceased paediatric kidney only transplant (3mth)
S=Steroid A=Azathioprine M=Mycophenolate C=Cyclosporin T=Tacrolimus Proportion of transplants Year of graft

53 Graft survival following first DBD paediatric kidney only transplant
yr survival 95% (92-97) N=308 yr survival 81% (77-85) N=360 yr survival 63% (58-68) N=411 yr survival 45% (41-50) N=488 yr survival 27% (23-31) N=442 p<0.0001

54 Graft survival following first DBD paediatric kidney only transplant
excluding failures within the first year yr survival 88% (84-91) N=328 yr survival 73% (68-78) N=345 yr survival 55% (50-60) N=392 yr survival 38% (32-44) N=310 p<0.01 p=0.5 (1991 – 2005)

55 Graft survival following first living paediatric kidney only transplant
yr survival 97% (94-98) N=286 yr survival 91% (86-95) N=198 yr survival 74% (64-81) N=116 yr survival 45% (32-58) N=67 yr survival 35% (20-50) N=47 p=0.008

56 excluding failures within the first year
Graft survival following first living paediatric kidney only transplant excluding failures within the first year yr survival 95% (90-97) N=173 yr survival 78.0% (68-85) N=107 yr survival 49% (34-62) N=60 yr survival 37% (22-53) N=42 p=0.009

57 Graft survival following first paediatric kidney only transplant
5 yr survival 10 yr survival 20 yr survival Living ( ) ( ) ( ) (n=714) p< p< p<0.0001 DBD ( ) ( ) ( ) (n=2009)

58 Graft survival following first paediatric kidney only transplant
5 yr survival 10 yr survival 20 yr survival Living ( ) ( ) ( ) (n=714) p< p< p<0.0001 DBD ( ) ( ) ( ) (n=2009)

59 Graft survival following first DBD paediatric kidney only transplant
<6 years 6-11 years 12-17 years

60 UK Renal Registry Paediatric Data

61 UK Paediatric Renal Registry
UK Renal Registry Report 2010

62 UK Paediatric Renal Registry
Treatment modality at 90 days after start of RRT by 5 year time period Current RRT treatment used by prevalent <16s in 2009 UK Renal Registry Report 2010

63 Pre-emptive Transplantation
NHSBT Transplant Activity in the UK,

64 UK Paediatric Renal Registry
UK Renal Registry Report 2010

65 UK Paediatric Renal Registry
Median systolic BP SDS in transplant pts in 2009 Median HtSDS in pts receiving RRT from with % receiving rhGH UK Renal Registry Report 2010

66 UK Paediatric Renal Registry
Hb standard by MMF use % Patients achieving the haemoglobin standard in 2009 Hb standard by GFR UK Renal Registry Report 2010

67 Transplant Work Up

68 The Transplant Team Radiologist Psychologists Transplant Co-ordinator
Nephrologist Surgeon Specialist renal nurses Tissue Typing Dietitian Social worker Teacher

69 Pre-Transplant Management
Attention to nutrition, growth, BP, proteinuria Pre-transplant work-up Blood vessels Echocardiogram Virology (CMV, EBV, Varicella) Bladder Psychology, education HLA antibodies Plan for operation There are two main aspects to the management pre-transplant. One is to have the child as well as possible to be able to deal with the rigours of the operation and immunosuppression and the other is to gather as much information as possible so as to be able to plan the operation and treatment without any nasty surprises. We need to know if the child is prone to viral infections EBV CMV etc, if the vessels are normal, if the bladder is safe.

70 Transplant Procedure Transplant surgeon and paediatric urologist
Anaesthetist Paediatric nephrologist Patient data easily accessible to all staff Patient well hydrated Early doppler USS if concerns re thrombosis Close monitoring in ITU

71

72 Current Immunosuppression
Tacrolimus Mycophenolate Mofitil Treatment Arm Daclizumab Prednisolone for 5 days Control Arm Standard prednisolone Treatment Arm Control Graft Survival 97% BPAR 10% 7% Growth 0.17SD 0.04SD Adverse Glucose Metabolism 3% 16% Grenda et al, 2010

73 Access to Transplantation

74 Access to transplantation
Criteria for suitable recipient Age / size Sensitisation Pre-emptive transplantation Virtual cross-match ABO Incompatibility Paired donation

75 HLA Match

76 HLA-A phenotype frequencies in 10 000 UK cadaver kidney donors
UK Transplant 09/03

77 ABOi Transplants Group A consists of 2 types – A1 and A2
A2 is less antigenic than A1 A1>B>A2 Group O patients have higher titres of antibodies Anti-A titres are higher than anti-B titres Titres of 1 in 8 or 1 in 16 are low No additional treatment necessary for low titre antibodies which do not appear to pose an additional risk

78 ABOi Transplants

79 ABOi Transplants O A B AB O A B AB Recipient Recipient Yes Yes* - Yes
No Donor Donor


Download ppt "Paediatric Renal Transplantation"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google