Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Airport Competition Andrew Charlton August 2018.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Airport Competition Andrew Charlton August 2018."— Presentation transcript:

1 Airport Competition Andrew Charlton August 2018

2 Airlines, Airports, Slots
Competition is agreed to generate good economic outcomes Competition requires competitors Policy determines number of airlines/airports Ability of airports to compete increases options Access to airports key to how airlines compete Slot rules control access These are policy choices for regulators

3 Changing Views on Competition in Aviation
Value Chain Traditional view Aviation is a life support for airlines Driven by Chicago Convention governance Eco-System Modern, liberalising view Each part separately adding value The choice of vision drives policy choices

4 Airport Competition Natural Monopoly? Competitive players?
Geography Airline Business Model Change Resources Competitive players? LCCs choose bases Legacy carriers adjust passenger flow Airlines look for rebates and marketing support Policy choices Chicago Convention makes States directly involved Regulatory Decisions

5

6 Airport competition in Europe
Source: ACI and Oxera

7 Categories of airport competition
Competition between airports for airline services on new and existing routes Competition between airports for connecting passengers Competition for passengers in local catchment Effective competition often arises at the margin Marginal decisions by airlines/passengers have important implications for airports Source Oxera

8 Economic Imperative Passenger growth continues to expand
Passenger numbers to double by 2030 In Asia, to double by 2025 Putting huge strain on existing infrastructure

9 Total number of planes operating in each region of the world, 2016–36
Global Growth Total number of planes operating in each region of the world, 2016–36 Source: Boeing (2017), ‘Global Market Overview’.

10 Growth by Aircraft Type

11 Growth by Aircraft Type - Implications
Growth is in new single aisle aircraft B737-MAX A320-NEO Their performance characteristics are now Medium/long range Growing numbers of passengers per aircraft Implication: More traffic at medium sized airports

12 Airline Dynamics Driving Growth
In Europe, much of the growth is from LCCs and long-haul hubbing carriers

13 LCC Growth

14 Long-haul Hubbing Growth

15 Airport Competition – Airport Churn
Legacy carriers, locked into one State, built hub operations Based around large hub airports All transfers/maintenance/administration centralised LHR/MAD/CDG/EZE New business model airlines do not rely on one hub True for LCCs Long-haul hubbing airlines have a single hub, in a remote geography Opportunity for airports to provide hubbing/connection services PTY/LPB Gives airlines opportunities to find best prices/services Rebates and discounts Service enhancements/design enhancements Routes Conferences

16 Airport Churn

17 Airport Competition – Hub Transfers
As legacy carriers consolidate, legacy networks include increasing numbers of hubs: IAG – LHR/DUB/MAD LH – FRA/MUC/ZRH/BRU/VIE AF/KLM – CDG/AMS Choice of connections for passengers across network Airports such as PTY/LPB offer interline connections Case Study – IAG LHR – For UK OD passengers DUB – For Europe-US OD passengers MAD – For Europe-Latam OD passengers Missing component? Europe-Asia

18

19 Airport Competition – Local Passengers
Local area competition has increased for large airports Largely due to opening/expanding smaller local airports Proportion of capacity with an alternative available within certain radii, by airport size, 2010 vs 2016 Has policy implications for regulators

20 Regulatory Decisions Regulators face a number of choices
Aviation is positive Cannot grow without infrastructure Competition for airport services is growing Need to make decisions about Building of airports Ownership of airports Oversight and regulation of airports

21 Building/Developing Airports

22 Ownership Traditionally, a national asset
ICAO guidelines & approach favours neutral operation Private Investors need return Focus on busy airports Small airports more complex Solution has been privatisation Under attack – IATA resolution in June 2018 opposing privatisation Published guide to other options Public Private Partnerships? Incentive schemes? Airport Networks? Cross subsidy of airports to regional airlines Airline concern is abuse of dominant position

23 Trends in Airport Ownership
Privatisation: Participation of the private sector in the management, financing, ownership of airport infrastructure Freehold Listed companies Concessions or leases Management contracts Government-owned companies Government-owned airports exclusively managed by public authorities Growing proportion of airports with private sector participation Highest propensity for private investment in airports in Europe (75%) and LatAm-Caribbean (60%) Private equity, rise of global airport companies and networks

24 Airport Ownership – ACI Policies
No ’One size fits all’ approach to airport ownership There is a need to create economic incentives and guarantee consistency within regulatory frameworks Evidence-based policymaking Fostering entrepreneurship and value creation

25

26

27

28 Profiling privatised airports
614 commercial airports have private sector participation Europe: 266 privatised airports LatAm-Caribbean: 153 privatised airports

29 Distribution of Airports by type of privatisation

30 IATA Guidelines Ownership
Government strategic objectives for airport ownership and operating models Macro-Economic objectives Domestic economic impact Efficient sector governance and regulation Sector efficiency and competitiveness Government control Financial objectives Capital receipts for Government PPP

31

32 Delivering a Privatisation Program
Financial sustainability Flexible and dynamic air travel market New sources of private finance and management capability Corporatisation and combination of models to achieve the objectives of privatisation Without sale assets and Without loss of government control Not-for-profit governance models No ‘one size fits all’ solution to airport ownership Changes justified by clear and transparent objectives Detailed transaction process and commercial structure design needed

33 Good deliverability of privatisation program
Governments should follow global best practice guidance Sufficient analysis and planning, aviation industry’s view consideration Development of the appropriate regulatory framework A competitive and transparent process is needed Safeguard public value, ensure continuity of service and appropriate investment in the airport Be realistic on the timescales required to complete a transaction

34 Best Regulation of Privately-Owned Airport
Safeguards to Prevent market abuse Secure efficiencies Service quality Regulatory model continually assessed over time Stronger forms of economic regulation in case of full privatisation

35 Private Capital and Regulatory Framework
Economic policy choices Necessary financing for much-needed air transport infrastructure 33% growth in passenger volumes from 2015 to 2020 Expected to handle an additional 2.4 billion passengers in 2022. Abuse of market power: Rise and prevalence of LCCs business model Presence of dominant carriers Formation of oligopolistic airline alliances …limit the price-cost margin for airport operators Accounting for non-aeronautical (commercial) revenues Consistency and continuity to oversight function guarantee: Predictability Overall reduction in regulatory risk

36 Financial Performance and Economic Incentives
Multifaceted challenges in the areas of: Safety Security Environment Compliance with economic regulations governing the pricing of airport services Value creation Helps generate returns for investors and stakeholders Insures future availability of capital to fund operations and innovations Airports generate real value for the passenger experience Who owns the passenger?

37 Airport Networks Airport owners to be free to determine management model Smaller airports rarely profitable 66% of airports operate at a loss 92% of those have fewer than 1million pax Cross-subsidisation of smaller airports an option Compliance with ICAO’s guidelines on charges possible Regulatory oversight proportionate to airport operator’s market power

38 Trends in Airport Networks
Types of airport management models: Single-airport Airport systems (two or more airports in one conurbation) Airport networks Common characteristics between airport networks and other network businesses Benefits of airport networks Safety Social and economic development Positive benefits to airlines

39 Airports networks

40

41 Airport Networks’ Efficiency and Competitivity
Cost efficiency 132 States with networks; 13 States are advanced economies; 119 are emerging markets and developing economies Operating a network generates efficiencies in operating and capital costs No costly duplication of functions at each airport Easier access to capital markets Competitive charges High level of customer experience

42 Regulatory Framework for Airport Networks
Recovery of aeronautical costs through charges Pool the costs of providing aeronautical services at the network level Recover these costs from airlines and passengers using the network ICAO framework common charging schemes Non-discrimination Cost-relatedness Transparency and consultation with airlines – consensus with users Cross-subsidies earmarked only for airport operation and development Proportionate framework: intervention only when necessary Abuse of market power Price discrimination

43 Economic regulation of airports
ICAO guidelines Encourages the establishment of autonomous entities Separation of oversight and operation Accepts possibility of privatization Charges to balance interests of Airports and airlines Minimize the risk of anti-competitive practices Ensure non-discrimination and transparency Ascertain current and future demand in a cost-effective manner Protect the interests of passengers Obligation for consultation No position on single/duel tills

44 Airport Regulation Essentially, about charging
Airlines fear airports use monopoly power Airfares vs airport charges? Fear of privatisation is creation of a private monopoly Private monopolies vs public monopolies Two approaches: Regulate charges Europe Regulate market power Australia/NZ

45 ECAA – Airport charges regime
Directive 2009/12: Airport Charges Creates independent supervisor agency per state Must establish rules for monitoring/enforcing Obligation to consult No final view on dual/single till Allows for pre-funding of investments Currently under review Extremely contentious Airport charges in some airports raising faster than airfares Raises issues of inter-airport competition

46 Aviation Advocacy Sarl
Rue de la Gare 17 1260 Nyon Switzerland Phone:


Download ppt "Airport Competition Andrew Charlton August 2018."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google