Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

SUMP Monitoring & Evaluation: the case of Metropolitan Thessaloniki Thessaloniki Public Transport Authority (ThePTA) Dr. Maria Spandou Chrysa Vizmpa Sam.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "SUMP Monitoring & Evaluation: the case of Metropolitan Thessaloniki Thessaloniki Public Transport Authority (ThePTA) Dr. Maria Spandou Chrysa Vizmpa Sam."— Presentation transcript:

1 SUMP Monitoring & Evaluation: the case of Metropolitan Thessaloniki Thessaloniki Public Transport Authority (ThePTA) Dr. Maria Spandou Chrysa Vizmpa Sam Salem ThePTA Associates ECOMM 2016, Athens,

2 Strategic SUMP of Metropolitan Thessaloniki
Developed in the framework of the ATTAC/SEE Programme, following the ELTIS Plus Guidelines, and approved in February 2014 Active participation from all national stakeholders (Mobility Forum) and support from international partners ThePTA received the “special prize of the Jury” SUMP Award 2014

3 Strategic SUMP of Metropolitan Thessaloniki (cont’d)
Smart and integrated ticketing & integrated payment system BRT & Bus priority at traffic signals Awareness campaigns Tram system Intermodality among PT modes Sea transport system Flexible Transport Systems Integrated parking policy Pedestrianization and public space regeneration Cycle lanes/ priority Bike sharing system Congestion charging and access control

4 SUMP Cycle: Where are we now?

5 Individual Evaluation
Collective Evaluation 10΄ 45΄

6 Individual Evaluation - Questionnaire
Evaluate the progress of the Strategic SUMP measures until now 5 – extremely satisfied 4 – very satisfied 3 - neutral 2 – minimally satisfied 1 – not satisfied at all 0 – no answer Evaluate the future progress of the Strategic SUMP measures will be implemented … 6 – … seamlessly & successfully 5 – … with few problems 4 – … several problems 3 – … significant problems 2 – … but not as planned 1 – will not be implemented 0 – no answer 2.19 3.26

7 Weighted average of satisfaction on perceived progress [1-5]
Individual Evaluation – Results “until now” Weighted average of satisfaction on perceived progress [1-5]

8 Individual Evaluation – Results “future”
Weighted average of expected progress [1-6]

9 Collective Evaluation – Methodology
Step #1 Step #2 = =

10 Which parameters have a positive impact [+] on the implementation of the Strategic SUMP measures?

11 Which parameters have a negative impact [-] on the implementation of the Strategic SUMP measures?

12 Importance vs Uncertainty

13 Thank you! Thessaloniki Public Transport Authority


Download ppt "SUMP Monitoring & Evaluation: the case of Metropolitan Thessaloniki Thessaloniki Public Transport Authority (ThePTA) Dr. Maria Spandou Chrysa Vizmpa Sam."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google