1. Deployable MOS Skills Match
Unit Status Report - 1st Battalion
Required
Authorized
Assigned
Deployable
Deployable MOS Skills Match
PVT-SPC 85 80 78
SGT 36 42 27 25
SSG 18 15 11
SFC 7 5 4
MSG 2 3
SGM 1
149
146
124
122
Deployable Strength % =
83.2%
Available MOS Skills Match % =
81.8%
Deployable Senior Grade % =
71.8%
P-Level =
P-3
Deployable Strength % =
_________
Available MOS Skills Match % =
Deployable Senior Grade % =
P-Level =
Perform the following calculations and determine the P-Level for 1st Battalion.
DEPLOYABLE STRENGTH %
Deployable Strength / Required Strength X 100
124 / 149 X 100 = 83.2% (P-2)
Available MOS Skills Match STRENGTH %
Available MOSSM / Required Strength X 100
122 / 149 X 100 = 81.8% (P-2)
DEPLOYABLE SENIOR GRADE %
Deployable Sr Grade / Required Sr Grade X 100
Junior NCO = 38 / 54 = 70.3%
Senior NCO = 8 / 10 = 80.0%
46 / 64 X 100 = 71.8% (P-3)

2. Learning Objective Action: Validate Unit Status Reporting
Condition: Senior HR Leaders in a classroom environment working individually and as a member of a small group, using doctrinal and administrative publications, practical exercises, case studies, personal experience, handouts, and discussion with an awareness of the Operational Environment (OE) variables and actors.
Standard: Analysis includes:
1. Verify Personnel and Medical Readiness Deployability Standards.
2. Administer HQDA USR Reporting Policies.
3. Verify Personnel Level (P-Level) Metrics.
4. Manage NetUSR Personnel Functions. 2

3. Personnel and Medical Readiness
Transformation

4. Verify Personnel and Medical Readiness Deployability Standards4

5. Bottom Line Up Front The culture of Readiness in the Army is changing.
Commanders and health care providers are collaborating to improve the health, welfare, and deployability of Soldiers.
“Readiness is my #1 priority.”
GEN Mark A. Milley, CSA
Personnel Readiness and Medical Deployability Transformation supports the Chief of Staff’s #1 priority.
This effort is both revolutionary and evolutionary in all aspects. The overhaul is essential and highly impactful.
The S-1 plays a key role assisting and supporting commanders and healthcare professionals.
There is no greater priority than Readiness!

6. Medical Readiness Policy Changes
The Medical Readiness policy is split into an AR and DA PAM to align with the Army Readiness reporting guidance.
The new AR keeps the policy statements simple and clear.
The SECARMY Directive written by OTSG, HQDA G-1, and HQDA G-3 provides the policy bridge to support implementation of Personnel Readiness transformation to coincide with reductions in Army End Strength.
Changes to the Medical Readiness Classification (MRC) codes, physical category codes, deployment limiting (DL) codes, and profiling system will be more fully described in the Medical Readiness AR and DA PAM upon publication.
The DA PAM describes how and in some cases why. There will be users and leaders guides to describe the more fluid aspects of the new processes and system.
AR will become the medical standards only.

7. Tactical Points of Influence
(Medical) Readiness is…
• Responsibility at the Squad level
• Ensured at the Platoon / Company level
• Reviewed at the Battalion / Brigade level
• Facilitated at the Installation level

8. MEDPROS Commander Portal
(1 of 2)
Integrates all essential medical readiness information in one easy-to-use application.
Company commander or designee will review the following medical readiness information to determine deployability:
Profile
Integrated Disability Evaluation System (IDES) status
Deployment Health Assessment Program Status
Periodic Health Assessment
Dental Readiness
Medical Readiness Assessment Tool data.
New MEDPROS Commander Portal
Link to the demo site:

9. MEDPROS Commander Portal
(2 of 2)
Commanders Portal Home Page provides the following features:
UNIT READINESS: A consolidated view of unit medical readiness, displays the overall Unit Readiness data and enables commanders to project out to future dates IOT proactively manage Unit Readiness.
MANAGE DEPLOYABILITY: Allows commanders to see the number of Soldiers requiring medical deployability determinations.
MANAGE PROFILES: A snapshot of Soldiers on profile and how many profiles still need to be reviewed.
RESOURCES: Provides links to unit Medical Readiness Assessment Tool (MRAT) and Integrated Disability Evaluation System (IDES) Dashboard.
ACTION ITEMS: Enables commanders to view all Soldiers with items that need to be actioned in one list regardless of the action needed. (e.g. profile review, deployability determination, overdue IMR items and deployment health assessments needed). This was previously in three different applications (eProfile, NetUSR, and MEDPROS Web Reporting).
MESSAGES: Enables the commander to track and manage communication with Providers regarding Soldiers on profile.

10. “Available” to “Deployed”
Deployable
Non-Deployable
Deployable – A Soldier who is:
Under the direct operational control of the reporting unit, whether present or can be present within 72 hours,
Is in compliance with all required personnel readiness standards
Is not restricted from deploying to perform the unit’s core designed and assigned missions.
Non-Deployable – A Soldier who is restricted from worldwide deployment for a unit’s core designed or assigned mission due to one of the following reasons:
Does not meet the Army’s baseline individual readiness standards for worldwide deployment as defined by Administrative and Medical policies;
Does not meet the Combatant Commander’s specific individual readiness standards when tailored for accomplishment of an assigned mission;
Cannot be under the direct operational control of the reporting unit (cannot be present within 72 hours); or
Has not graduated from an Area of Concentration (AOC) or Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) awarding course.
Commander’s Call – any reason not mentioned above.
Applicable to all Operating and Generating Force Soldiers regardless of component

11. Deployment-Limiting Codes
Description
Reference: SECARMY Directive , Table 1 1
Temp Profile > 14 days 2
Dental Readiness Class 3 3
Pregnancy 4
Permanent profile indicating a MAR2 action needed 5
Permanent profile indicating a MEB action needed 6
Permanent profile indicating a Non-Duty Related action is needed 7
Permanent profiles with a deployment / assignment restriction code (F, V, or X)

12. Physical Category Codes Reference: SECARMY Directive 2016-07, Table 2
Description
Reference: SECARMY Directive , Table 2 F
No assignment or deployment to OCONUS areas where definitive medical care for the Soldier’s medical condition is not available. S
MEB. Soldier has been determined to meet medical retention standards by a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). T
Waiver granted for a disqualifying medical condition/standard for initial enlistment or appointment. The disqualifying medical condition/standard for which a waiver was granted will be documented in the Soldier’s accession medical examination. V
Deployment. This code identifies a Soldier with restrictions on deployment to certain areas. W
MAR2. This Soldier has a permanent 3 or 4 profile with a MAR2 (MOS Administrative Retention Review) finding of retain or reclassify and returned to duty. X
COAD/COAR. This Soldier is allowed to continue in the military service with a disease, injury, or medical defect that is below medical retention standards, pursuant to a waiver of retention standards, or waiver of unfit finding and continued on active duty or in active Reserve status under AR 635–40. Y
Fit for duty. This Soldier has been determined to be fit for duty (not entitled to separation or retirement because of physical disability) after complete processing under AR 635–40.

13. Medical Readiness Classes (MRC)
Short Definition
Medical Definition
CDR Deployability Determination
MRC 1
Medically Ready / Deployable
Meets all Medical Readiness Requirements and Dental Readiness Class 1 or 2
– Temp Profile ≤ 7 days
Not required
MRC 2
Partially Medically Ready / Deployable
Soldier is deficient in one of the following:
– Temp Profile between 8 and 14 days inclusive
– Hearing Readiness Class 4 (current within 13 months)
– Vision Readiness Class 4 (current within 15 months)
– DNA (Drawn/ on file with DoD Repository)
– HIV (Drawn / validated with DoD Repository)
– Immunizations current or valid exception (Routine Adult Immunization Profile)
– HepA, HepB, TDA, MMR, Polio, Varicella, (Influenza-seasonal)
– Individual Medical Equipment (1MI, 2 pair eye glasses, MCEP-I, MWT, and Hearing Aid w/batteries, if required
Not required.
MRC 3
Not Medically Ready /
Non-Deployable
Commander determines
Deployability for:
– Temp Profile >14 Days (DL1)
– Dental Readiness
Class 3 (DL2)
Deployment Limiting Condition (DL). Soldier is deficient in one of the following:
DL 1– Temp Profile > 14 days
DL 2– Dental Readiness Class 3
DL 3– Pregnancy or post-partum
DL 4– Permanent profile indicating an MOS Administrative Retention Review (MAR2) action is needed
DL 5– Permanent profile indicating a MEB action is needed
DL 6– Permanent profile indicating a Non-Duty Related action is needed
DL 7– Permanent profiles with a deployment / assignment restriction code (F, V, or X)
DL 1 / 2: Soldier is Not Medically Ready / Non-Deployable; commander
determines Deployability.
DL 3 / 4 / 5 / 6: Soldier cannot be deemed deployable by commander and by policy.
DL 7: Soldier cannot be deemed deployable by the commander. Upon receipt of an assigned mission, may request COCOM waivers.
MRC 4
Non-Deployable and
CDR determines
Deployability (default
Non-Deployable)
Status is unknown.
– Periodic Health Assessment (current within 15 months)
– Dental Readiness Class 4 (current within 15 Months
Soldier is Not Medically Ready / Non-Deployable
Commander determines Deployability.

14. Administrative Non-Deployable Reference: SECARMY Directive 2016-07
1. Does not meet baseline Individual Readiness Standards.
• Lautenberg Amendment
• Legal Processing
• Military, civil, or criminal investigation activity
• Pending legal discharge or separation
• Sole Survivor / Surviving Family member
• Conscientious Objector
• Under the age of 18
• Inadequate Family Care Plan
• Parenthood or Adoption
• Postpartum Operational Deferment.
2. Does not meet combatant commander’s (COCOM’s) mission-specific individual readiness standards when tailored for accomplishment of an assigned mission.
3. Cannot be under direct operational control of reporting unit (present or able to be present within 72 hours)
Transition leave or AWOL
No Operational Control (e.g., have deployed separately, rear detachment, TCS, etc.).
4. Soldiers who have not graduated from an AOC / MOS awarding course.
5. Commander’s Call.
Reference: SECARMY Directive

15. New DA Form 3349 Physical Profile
(Page 1)
• A single living document with temporary and permanent profiles on a single form.
• Incorporates all current functional and assignment limitations.
• Tracks total number of days a Soldier has been on profile and by condition.
• Increases visibility (MEB / IDES).
• Permanent profiles must be transcribed into the new system within 15 months (with current supporting evidence if needed)
• If in MEB / PEB process, only MEB physician can transcribe
Section 5
Medical Instructions to Unit Commanders
Details what a Soldier cannot physically do
Commanders cannot disregard based on new policy guidance

16. New DA Form 3349 Physical Profile
(Page 2)
Section 6 – APFT
Details permanent and/or temporary limitations
No automatic recovery period – Soldier can take a record APFT when physically able, even with alternate event
Section 8 – Unit Commander
Unit CDR or his/her designee must review all profiles in the CDR portal, which is recorded here.
Section 7
Physical Readiness Training Capabilities
Describes the PRT instructions to optimize Soldier recovery and participation in unit training.
Providers will be trained to focus on capabilities.

18. Administer HQDA USR Reporting Policies
AR 220-1
DA PAM 220-1
Army Directive

19. Adjustments to Readiness Reporting
Policy in AR 220-1
REFERENCE: SECARMY Directive , Redesign of Personnel Readiness and Medical Deployability (1 March 2016).
Readiness Reporting
Commanders will no longer report the “available” status of personnel in the USR.
Commanders will report the “deployable” status of all personnel in USR as it relates to unit personnel readiness status (P-Level).
Commander’s override to a Soldier’s administrative and medical deployability will be performed in the authoritative data sources that provide medical and administrative readiness status (e.g., MEDPROS, eMILPO, RLAS, SIDPERS).
Overall Unit Readiness
Directive does not change the assessment of unit overall readiness to perform its core mission IAW its designed capabilities or assigned mission.
A unit’s C-Level assessment will continue to be derived from the four measured areas of P, S, R, T levels.
Personnel Measured Areas (P-Level)
Unit will measure personnel readiness using three metrics:
Total Deployable Strength
Assigned Military Occupational Specialty skills match
Deployable Senior Grade Composite level.
The terms “available / non-available” replaced by “deployable / non-deployable.”

20. Commander’s Unit Status Report
(CUSR)
Status Updates Briefed Monthly to Army Senior Leadership
CUSR Overview
The CUSR is intended to be a “commander’s report,” reflecting the commander’s personal judgments and assessments regarding the mission readiness of the unit.
Reports are prepared by commanders or their designated representatives and routinely submitted through administrative control (ADCON) channels to HQDA.
The CUSR is not a performance report card and should not be used as a tool to evaluate or compare the accomplishments of organizations or those of their commanders.
All commanders at all times will submit timely, accurate and complete reports that neither exaggerate nor mask their units’ readiness deficiencies.
No commander is expected to report readiness levels that are inconsistent with resources made available to the unit.
ADCON authorities at higher levels will review reports to ensure that they comply with regulatory requirements.

21. USR Reporting Basics
Reporting Units --
BATTALION
I I
Unit level reports are submitted from detachments, separate companies, battalions, consolidated by brigade.
Composite level reports are submitted at the division and separate brigade level. Commander considers all units assigned within the organizational structure and assesses overall readiness.
DIVISION XX
Measured Areas -- Status of 4 primary areas (PSRT)
Personnel (P)
Equipment and Supplies on-hand / available (S)
Equipment Readiness / Serviceability (R)
Unit Training Proficiency (T)
Frequency --
Active units submit Regular reports monthly
Reserve units submit Regular reports quarterly
Army Garrison or Installations submit Regular reports quarterly
Reports are submitted as of the 15th of the month
PRIMARY REFERENCES
AR 220-1, Army Unit Status Reporting and Force Registration-Consolidated Policies
DA PAM 220-1, Defense Readiness Reporting System-Army Procedures
NetUSR Training Support Package, Users Guides and Software Application
AR 220-1, Chapters 4 and 10

22. USR Security Classification
AR 220-1, Chapter 11
Classification is based on number/type of reporting units and the amount/type of sensitive information. Minimum classification for MTOE units:
SECRET: Major Combat Units (FF-level UIC) at the brigade- level and above
SECRET: More than one battalion or five or more separate MTOE company/detachment sized units (AA-level UIC)
CONFIDENTIAL: All reports not classified SECRET IAW established guidelines
Retain for minimum of 2 years at the major unit/headquarters level; not less than 6 months by other reporting units (AA-level UIC)
All USRs and associated data will be marked with a specific declassification date

23. Unit Status Report (CUSR)
Commanders
Unit Status Report (CUSR)
THE BIG AR CHANGE
One report contains both the “as designed“ and “assigned mission” assessments.
Commanders always report this assessment monthly.
Fulfills Existing Joint Staff Requirements
(supports Congressional Oversight, Chairman’s Risk Assessment, and other COCOM oriented assessments)
Core Functions/Designed Capabilities = MTOE/TDA
Personnel
Equipment on Hand
Equipment Serviceability
Training
(METL)
C-Level
How well a unit is resourced and trained, measured against the core functions and fundamental capabilities for which it was “as designed”
A-Level
How well a unit is resourced and trained measured against the “assigned mission” requirements of the unit.
Feeds Joint Staff Percentage Effective (PCTEF) data requirement)
Assigned Mission Manning
Assigned Mission Equipping
A-Level Reporting Trigger. Commanders report A-Level when one condition is met:
Directed by chain of command.
When the focus of training is the deployed mission environment (i.e., NLT LAD minus 270 days)
Commanders report this assessment when a mission is assigned.
AR 220-1, Chapter 9

24. Category Levels (C-Level)
An overall unit readiness metric established by the Joint Staff.
C-levels reflect the unit‘s ability to accomplish core functions, provide designed capabilities, and execute the standardized METs.
Derived from four measured areas (PSRT) that indicate the availability status of resources and unit training proficiency measured against the designed capabilities from the unit’s MTOE or TDA.
C-1: Unit can undertake the missions it was designed for
C-2: Unit possesses the required resources and is trained to undertake most of the its missions for which it is designed
C-3: Unit possesses the required resources and is trained to undertake many, but not all, portions of the mission for which it is designed
C-4: Unit requires additional resources or training to undertake its designed mission, but may be directed to undertake some portions of its mission with resources on hand
C-5: Unit is undergoing a service directed resource action and is not prepared, at this time, to undertake the full spectrum mission for which designed.
AR 220-1, para 4-4a DA PAM 220-1, para 3-5

25. Category Level C-5
Indicates the unit is undergoing a HQDA-directed resource action and is not prepared, at this time, to undertake the full spectrum mission for which it is designed (i.e., accomplish core functions and provide designed capabilities).
Unit may be capable of undertaking nontraditional or non- standard missions.
C-5 units restricted to the following:
Reconstituting following deployment or are undergoing activation, inactivation, conversion, or other HQDA-directed resource action
Not manned or equipped but are required in the wartime structure (that is, COMPO 4 units)
Placed in cadre status by HQDA.
Directed to report C-5 by HQDA (DAMO-ODR)
DA PAM 220-1, para 3-5a(5)

26. Assigned Mission Levels (A-Level)
Overall assessment that reflects the unit’s ability to accomplish the assigned mission and those tasks on its METL.
Contains measured resource areas that indicate the availability status of resources (personnel and equipment) measured against resource requirements for the assigned mission.
The following definitions apply:
A-1: Unit possesses the required resources and is trained to undertake the full assigned mission.
A-2: Unit possesses the required resources and is trained to undertake most of the assigned mission.
A-3: Unit possesses the required resources and is trained to undertake many, but not all, portions of the assigned mission.
A-4: Unit requires additional resources or training to undertake the assigned mission, but may be directed to undertake portions of the assigned mission with resources on hand.
AR 220-1, Appendix C DA PAM 220-1, para 3-5(b)

27. The Four Tier Rating Scale
The following metrics comprise the “four tier” rating scale for unit readiness status measurements and assessments. Note that level 5 and level 6 are exceptional values reported in place of level 4 or only when special circumstances apply, respectively. 1
Unit possesses required resources and is trained to accomplish or provide the core functions and fundamental capabilities for which it was designed or to undertake the mission it is currently assigned. 2
Unit possesses required resources and is trained to accomplish or provide most of the core functions and fundamental capabilities for which it was designed or to undertake most of the mission it is currently assigned. 3
Unit possesses the required resources and is trained to accomplish or provide many, but not all, of the core functions and fundamental capabilities for which it was designed or to undertake many, but not all, portions of the mission it is currently assigned. 4
Unit requires additional resources or training to accomplish or provide the core functions and fundamental capabilities for which it was designed or to undertake the mission currently assigned; however, the unit may be directed to undertake portions of the assigned mission with resources on hand (available). 5
Unit is undergoing a HQDA-directed resource action and/or is part of a HQDA directed program and is not prepared to accomplish or provide the core functions or fundamental capabilities for which it was designed. Units report C-5 IAW the policy and procedures established in AR 220-1, para 4-8. Level 5 is not applicable to A-level reporting. 6
Level 6 is applicable to the measured areas only. It indicates that a measured area is not measurable, or by HQDA direction, is not measured.
AR 220-1, para DA PAM 220-1, para 3-5

28. Mission Capability Assessments
The “three tier” rating scale (Y / Q / N) will be used by all measured units to determine and report their Mission Essential Task (MET) capability assessments. Y
“Yes” - The organization can accomplish the task to standard under the specified conditions. A “Yes” assessment should reflect demonstrated performance in training or operations whenever possible. Q
“Qualified Yes” - The organization is expected to accomplish the task to standard, but this performance has not been observed or demonstrated in training or operations. Organizations assessing their task capability as a “Qualified Yes” may be employed for those tasks. N
“No” - The organization is unable to accomplish the MET to standard at this time.
T/P/U (ADRP 7-0) measures unit’s training proficiency for its METL tasks.
Y/Q/N capability assessment is intended to reflect a unit’s actual potential to perform the task.
AR 220-1, para DA PAM 220-1, para ADRP 7-0, para 3-71

29. One Minute Summary

30. Verify Personnel Level (P-Level) Metrics
Equipment Readiness
Equipment and Supplies
Training
USR

31. Personnel Metrics and Data Points
Critical personnel metrics include:
Required Strength
Assigned Strength Percentage
Total Deployable Strength
Assigned MOS Skills Match
Deployable Senior Grade Composite Level
Metrics: Readiness status measurements or assessments accomplished IAW the criteria established by AR
Data Points: Measurements, assessments, or facts that do not directly support the resource measurement; however, provide specific info for management oversight or trend analysis.
Determine P-Level
Used to
Metrics for Determining P-Level
Deployable Senior Grade
Level
Deployable Strength
Assigned MOS Skills Match
By Category
Composite 1
100% - 90%
100% - 85% %
1.54 or less 2
89% - 80%
84% - 75% % 3
79% - 70%
74% - 65% % 4
69% or less
64% or less
3.35 or more

32. Required Strength
Required Strength = Unit’s formal requirements (MTOE or TDA). Required strength is the baseline (denominator) for each of the three P-Level metrics.

33. Assigned strength % = Assigned Strength ÷ Required Strength x 100
Assigned Strength = Soldiers formally assigned to a unit by official orders.
Unique Criteria for Compo 1, RC Units, AGR, and AMEDD
Active Army uses eMILPO Unit Personnel Accountability Report (AAA-162)
ARNG uses SIDPERS Zero Balance Report (C-27)
RC units include AGR personnel scheduled to deploy with unit
RC units will not include Inactive ARNG personnel or those in holding account
Medical units include individuals from Professional Filler System (PROFIS)
Count individuals against only one unit
Assigned strength % = Assigned Strength ÷ Required Strength x 100

34. Personnel Deployability
Deployable Strength
SECARMY Directive , Redesign of Personnel Readiness and Medical Deployability (1 March 2016), specified that commander’s will no longer report the “Available” status of personnel in USR.
Deployable Strength = The portion of the unit’s assigned strength and attachments, to include individual Soldier augmentations, that are considered deployable with the unit to accomplish the core functions and / or designed capabilities for which the unit was designed.
P-level
Deployable % % % 69% or less
Personnel Deployability
Criteria
SECARMY Directive
Deployable Strength % = Deployable Strength ÷ Required Strength x 100

35. Administrative Non-Deployable Categories and MRCs
Individual Readiness Standards
• Lautenberg Amendment
• Legal Processing
• Military, civil, or criminal investigation activity
• Pending legal discharge or separation
• Sole Survivor / Surviving Family member
• Conscientious Objector
• Under the age of 18
• Inadequate Family Care Plan
• Parenthood or Adoption
• Postpartum Operational Deferment.
Not under direct operational control
COCOM
COCOMs have specific deployment criteria that apply to their assigned mission
Medical Readiness Classifications
MR1 - Medically Ready / Deployable
MR2 – Partially Medically Ready / Deployable
MR3 – Not Medically Ready / Non-Deployable Commander determines deployability for: DL1 – Temp Profile > 14 days DL2 – Dental Readiness Class 3
MR4 – Non Medically Ready / Nondeployable and Commander determines deployability (default is nondeployable)
Reference: SECARMY Directive

36. Assigned MOS Skills Match
Assigned MOS Skills Match = Soldiers assigned and attached who are currently deployable and possess the training and skills necessary to perform effectively in the duty position currently slotted (AR 220-1, para 9-2e).
Includes:
Soldiers who possess the required MOS (includes additional or secondary MOS) required by MTOE / TDA
Soldiers who hold MOS formally designated or directed for substitution by HQDA
Enlisted Soldiers serving in duty positions up to two grades higher or one grade lower than current grade
Officers and Warrant Officers serving one grade higher and one grade lower than current grade
Do not count SQI or LIC except for AMEDD personnel and authorized linguist positions
Deployable DMOSQ = Deployable Asgn/Atch DMOSQ ÷ Required Strength X 100
NOTE: Commanders will indicate in their remarks any subjective assessments of MOS qualification that are in variance with HQDA requirements and will consider subjective assessments of MOSQ by duty position when determining overall C-level. AR 220-1, para 9-2e(2)
P-level
DMOSQ % % % 64% or less

37. Deployable Senior Grade Composite
Deployable Senior-grade composite level = Aggregation of the discrete levels for each of the five categories of senior-grade personnel:
Junior NCO (E5 - E6) Junior Officer (O1 - O3)
Senior NCO (E7 - E9) Senior Officer (O4 - O6)
Warrant Officer (W1 - W5)
Deployable SG% = Deployable SG ÷ Senior Grade Requirements
Deployable Senior Grade
Level
By Category
Composite 1 %
1.54 or less 2 % 3 % 4
64% or less
3.35 or more
Composite Example
Jr NCO
87%
P-1
Sr NCO
72%
P-3 WO
94%
Jr Off
65%
Sr Off
97%
(9)
9 ÷ 5 = 1.8
P-2

38. Determining the P-Level
Step 1: Assigned Strength is entered into CUSR, does not factor into P-rating
Step 2: Calculations must be performed for all three personnel categories below. Each is entered into CUSR
Personnel Category
ASSIGNED STRENGTH
A) DEPLOYABLE STRENGTH
B) ASSIGNED MOS SKILLS MATCH
C) DEPLOYABLE SR GRADE COMPOSITE
Personnel Status Calculations
(Assigned Strength ÷ Required Strength) x 100
(Deployable Strength ÷ Required Strength) x 100
(Deployable Assigned MOS Skills match personnel ÷ Required MOSQ Strength) x 100
(Deployable Sr Grade Strength ÷ Required Senior-Grade) Strength x 100
Step 3: Unit P-Level is based on the lowest (worst case) personnel status percentage calculation. (e.g., If a unit is P1 for deployable strength and assigned MOS skills match strength, but is P3 for deployable senior grade strength, then the unit is P3)
P Level
Deployable Strength %
Assigned MOS Skills Strength %
Deployable Sr Grade Strength % P1
100-90%
100-85% P2
89-80%
84-75% P3
79-70%
74-65% P4
69% or less
64% or less

39. NetUSR

40. Defense Readiness Reporting System-Army (DRRS-A)
DoD’s single readiness reporting system
User interface for DRRS-A is NetUSR
Secure, web-based information system
Resource information provided via authoritative databases and not via input from individual units
Units use the NetUSR tool to determine and communicate their status and mission capabilities

41. NetUSR
PERSONNEL TAB
Strength - review and validate data from authoritative databases used to calculate P-Rating
Roll-Up By Grade - summary of personnel by grade
Shortage Ranking - relative ranking of MOS / position shortfalls
September 15, 2017 41

42. NetUSR - Types of Reports
Table 3-1, DA Pam 220-1
Regular Report - Full report routinely submitted monthly by NON-DEPLOYED COMPO 1 units, by NON-DEPLOYED RC units while on active duty status, and by designated RC units when directed or following their formal alert for deployment.
Validation Report - Intra-quarterly report routinely submitted by designated Generating Force units, APS custodians and by USAR and ARNG units that are not mobilized or on active duty status.
Deployed Report - Abbreviated report meeting the minimum information and status reporting requirements that is routinely submitted monthly by a DEPLOYED unit.
Composite Report - “Regular” report that is routinely prepared and submitted by major units and major headquarters (brigade-level and above).
Composite Report-Type II - Abbreviated special report submitted monthly by designated NON- DEPLOYED COMPO 1 units/headquarters and by designated NON DEPLOYED RC major units/headquarters.
Installation Status Report - Quarterly special report submitted by designated Army installations; measures the facility’s infrastructure readiness based on physical capitalized infrastructure measurements contained in the ISR.
DUIC Special Reports - Abbreviated special report for non-deployed/non-deployed ad-hoc elements or entities.
Generating Force Short Report - Generating Forces Short Report - Modified report submitted quarterly by TDA non-deployable (generating force units) that have no authoritative data available.

43. PAVR - eMILPO
ASGN PER:
# and % of Assigned Personnel
AVAL PER:
# and % of Available Personnel
MOSQ:
# and % of MOS Qualified # of Senior Qualified
SGPER:
# and % of Senior Grade Personnel Available
TOPER:
# and % of Turnover Personnel
List of Available Soldiers
List of Non-Available Soldiers
List of Soldiers MOS Qualified
List of Soldiers Not MOS-Qualified
PAVR INFO:
List of those Soldiers the commander granted waiver for Non-Available and MOS-Qualified
FEMASGD: # of female Soldiers assigned
FEM PCT: Percentage of females in the unit
FEMPREG: # of Female Soldiers who are Pregnant
PCTPREG: Percentage of female Soldiers who are pregnant
PROFREQ:
# of Professional Fillers required
PROAVAL:
# of Professional Fillers Available
PROFPCT:
Professional Filler Percentage
NOTE: Changes to eMILPO are expected to facilitate HQDA adjustments to Readiness Reporting policies.
Links to:
PSBG: Personnel Strength By Grade Report
MOSSR: Military Occupational Specialty Shortage Report
ASI/SQISR: Additional Skill Identifier/Skill Qualification Identifier Shortage Report
LSSR: Language Skill Shortage Report
Non-Avail: Non-Available Report
UIC Selection: Change UIC

44. Equipment and Supplies
S-1 Takeaways
Personnel
Equipment Readiness
Equipment and Supplies
Training
USR
S-1s / HR professionals play a significant role in force readiness and unit status reporting.
Use the “system of record” (eMILPO/ SIDPERS) and make data accuracy a priority.
Be credible in reporting.
Manage readiness at your level as you would expect it to be managed by higher headquarters.
Become the “subject matter expert” in strength management and personnel readiness in your organization.
Make higher HQ your allies.
The professional knowledge of leaders is essential to sound teaching and to improve the proficiency as well as the readiness of units.
GEN John Wickham, Jr.
Chief of Staff, Army

45. Learning Objective Action: Validate Unit Status Reporting
Condition: Senior HR Leaders in a classroom environment working individually and as a member of a small group, using doctrinal and administrative publications, practical exercises, case studies, personal experience, handouts, and discussion with an awareness of the Operational Environment (OE) variables and actors.
Standard: Analysis includes:
1. Verify Personnel and Medical Readiness Deployability Standards.
2. Administer HQDA USR Reporting Policies.
3. Verify Personnel Level (P-Level) Metrics.
4. Manage NetUSR Personnel Functions. 45