Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Hadron PID recalibration in EMCAL GeV dataset)

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Hadron PID recalibration in EMCAL GeV dataset)"— Presentation transcript:

1 Hadron PID recalibration in EMCAL (Au-Au @200 GeV dataset)
Dipali Pal and Debsankar Mukhopadhyay 05/10/2005

2 Outline Run4 200 GeV Au-Au stripe –2 dataset PbSc east and west
Timing calibration was done by SUNY Phys. PID functions: isPi, isK and isP -- Fit mass-squared distributions at different momentum slices within 0.2 < p(GeV/c) < 2.2. -- Determine centroids and s’s of m2 distribution for pi, K and p at different momenta. -- Study and parametrize s vs p and centroid vs p. -- PID function: isN = [m2(measured) – m2(parametrized)]/s N = pi, K, p

3 Analysis Events: Minimum-bias CNT files |bbcz| < 30 cm
Tracks: 3s matching at PbSc Used Sarah’s EmcTof timing recalibrator via master recalibrator module under fun4all.

4 Studying PbSc PID ranges from m2 distributions (Negative tracks) -- 1

5 Studying PbSc PID ranges from m2 distributions (Negative tracks) -- 2
Summary: PID starts from p = 0.3 Gev/c Protons are visible from p = 0.5 GeV/c All p, K, p are separated within 0.5 – 1.0 GeV/c p and K are separated within 0.3 < p (GeV/c) < 1.0 Both p and p are visible upto p = 2.0 GeV/c

6 Studying PbSc PID ranges from m2 distributions (Positive tracks) -- 1

7 Studying PbSc PID ranges from m2 distributions (Positive tracks) -- 2
Summary: PID starts from p = 0.3 Gev/c Protons are visible from p = 0.5 GeV/c All p, K, p are separated within 0.5 – 1.0 GeV/c p and K are separated within 0.3 < p (GeV/c) < 1.0 Both p and p are visible upto p = 2.0 GeV/c

8 m2 distributions and fitting – p(1)
Fitting function: Gaussian (signal)+ second order polynimial(BG) Centroids and s’s within 0.4 < p(GeV/c) < 1.2 GeV/c

9 m2 distributions and fitting – p (2)
p <m2> Dm s Ds e e e e-06 e e e e-06 e e e e-06 e e e e-05 e e e e-05 e e e e-05 e e e e-05 e e e e-05 e e e e-05 e e e e-05 e e e e-05 e e e e-05 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04

10 m2 distributions and fitting – p (3)
p <m2> Dm s Ds e e e e-06 e e e e-06 e e e e-06 e e e e-05 e e e e-05 e e e e-05 e e e e-05 e e e e-05 e e e e-05 e e e e-05 e e e e-05 e e e e-05 e e e e-05 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04

11 m2 distributions and fitting – Kaon
Fitting function: Gaussian (signal)+ Exponential (BG) Centroids and s’s within 0.4 < p(GeV/c) < 1.0 GeV/c

12 m2 distributions and fitting parameters: K+
p <m2> Dm s Ds e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04

13 m2 distributions and fitting parameters: K-
p <m2> Dm s Ds e e e e-04 e e e e-05 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04

14 m2 distributions and fitting – protons
Fitting function: Gaussian (signal)+ Exponential (BG) Centroids and s’s within 0.5 < p(GeV/c) < 2 GeV/c p-bar looks different from p at higher momenta.

15 m2 distributions and fitting parameters
anti-proton proton p <m2> Dm s Ds p <m2> Dm s Ds e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-03 e e e e-04 e e e e-03 e e e e-03 e e e e-03 e e e e-03 e e e e-03 e e e e-03 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-04 e e e e-03 e e e e-03 e e e e-03 e e e e-03 e e e e-03

16 m2 Centroids vs momenta Centroids are fitted with 3rd order polynimial
as functions of p: p0 + p1*x + p2*x2 + p3*x3 p p p p3 p+ p- K+ K- P P-bar e e e e-02 e e e e-02 e e e e-01 e e e e-01 e e e e-02 e e e e-02

17 Sigma vs momentum: pion
Fitting function: p0 + p1/x + p2/x2 + p3.x2 p p p p3 p p

18 Sigma vs momentum: kaon
Fitting function: p0 + p1/x + p2/x2 + p3.x2 p p p p3 K K

19 Sigma vs momentum: proton
P-bar Fitting function: p0 + p1/x + p2/x2 + p3.x2 p p p p3 p p-bar

20 Identified particles

21 Summary PID calibration functions are completed for run4 200 GeV dataset. Need to put them in recalibrator and database.


Download ppt "Hadron PID recalibration in EMCAL GeV dataset)"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google