Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Computer-Mediated Communication

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Computer-Mediated Communication"— Presentation transcript:

1 Computer-Mediated Communication
Collective Action and Collaborative Editing Systems

2 First Annual CMC Tournament
9/20/2018 Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

3 Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore
Types of dilemmas Coop Defect 3,3 (R) 0,5 (S) 5,0 (T) 1,1 (P) Different games make different use of the payouts T>R>P>S Prisoner's Dilemma T>R>S>P Chicken T>P>R>S Deadlock R>T>P>S Stag Hunt Standard PD game T>R>P>S 9/20/2018 Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

4 The Evolution of Cooperation
Axelrod’s famous tournament allowed individuals to submit any strategy. All strategies played each other in the tournament. The winner was one of the shortest submissions, about 4 lines of code. 9/20/2018 Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

5 The Simple Effectiveness of the Tit-for-Tat Strategy
Tit-for-Tat: begin with ‘cooperate’ and then do whatever the opponent did on the last turn. 9/20/2018 Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

6 Lessons from Tit-for-Tat
Be nice It starts by cooperating. All top-scoring strategies do this. Be forgiving It quickly and happily returns to cooperation without holding a grudge. Be able to retaliate It never allows defection to go unpunished. Be clear It is predictable and easy to understand. It pays to be predictable in non-zero sum games. 9/20/2018 Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

7 Is Tit-for-Tat Always the Answer?
2-person repeated PD N-person PD Public Good 9/20/2018 Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

8 Where does this apply in our world?
Wherever we find mixed-motive situations and collective action… Standards Wars Online Tagging Systems (folksonomies), Collaborative Editing Systems Del.ic.ious 9/20/2018 Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

9 Public goods on the Internet
Smaller groups tend to have a better chance of producing a public good (Olson 1965) Why? More benefits for each person Larger impact of any single contribution Generally, lower costs of organization 9/20/2018 Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore

10 But what about reaaaally big groups?
Analyzing and Visualizing the Semantic Coverage of Wikipedia and Its Authors (Holloway, Bozicevic and Borner 2005) 9/20/2018 Computer-Mediated Communication — Cheshire & Fiore


Download ppt "Computer-Mediated Communication"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google