1. Mid Day Meal Scheme MDM-PAB Meeting - MEGHALAYA on 13.04.2010
Ministry of HRD
Government of India
MDM-PAB Meeting - MEGHALAYA on 1 1

2. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Part-I
Review of Implementation of MDMS in MEGHALAYA (Primary + Upper Primary) ( to )
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

3. No. of Schools Covered (PY + UP.PY)3

4. PAB Approval Vs State Performance (No. of children in Q1+Q2+Q3)
94% Covered
96% Covered
No. of children (In lakh)
88% Covered
Non coverage (Primary): Jaintia Hills(13% Children), West Garo Hills(11% Children) …
Non coverage (Upper Primary): East Khasi Hills(34% Children), Jaintia Hills(20% Children).. 4
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

5. PAB Approval Vs State Performance (No. of Working Days in Q1+Q2+Q3)
100%
83%
81%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

6. PAB Approval Vs State Performance (No. of Meals in Q1+Q2+Q3)
Meals to be served
Meals served
No. of Meal (in Crore)
100%
83%
75%
Non coverage (Primary): Jaintia Hills(30% Meals), West Garo Hills(28% Meals) …
Non coverage (Upper Primary): East Khasi Hills(46% Meals), Jaintia Hills(35% Meals).. 6

7. Food Grains Utilisation(1.4.09 to 31.12.09)
Foodgrains (in MTs)
20% less utilized
Food Grain unutilised:Jaintia Hills(49% FG),East Khasi Hills(37% FG),West Garo Hills(08%FG) … 7

8. Food grains lifting Month-wise(Q1+Q2+Q3)[FCI BIILS]##
Foodgrains (in MTs)
* Including Unspent balance
## includes November and December lifting 8
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

9. Cooking Cost Utilisation (1.4.09 to 31.12.09)
25%
Cooking Cost unutilised:Jaintia Hills(36% CC), East Khasi Hills(38% CC) 9
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

10. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
MME Utilisation ( to )
56% 10
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

11. Transport Assistance Utilisation (1.4.09 to 31.12.09)11
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

12. Performance during 2006-10 (Kitchen Sheds)
100% utilisation of Physical
100% utilisation of Financial 12
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

13. Performance during 2006-10 (Kitchen Devices)
100% utilisation of Physical
100% utilisation of Financial 13
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

14. Performance Score card 2009-2010Sl
Component
Performance
Benchmark 1.
No of Schools covered under MDM
100% 2.
No of Children (PY+ UP.PY)
94% 3.
No of Working Days
81%
83% 5.
Foodgrains Utilisation
75% 6.
Cooking Cost Utilisation 7.
MME Utilisation
44% 8.
Transport Assistance
00% 9.
Kitchen Shed construction
10.
Kitchen Devices procurement
11.
QPRs
3 nos.

15. Analysis of State’s Proposal for 2010-1115
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

16. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Time Series (PRIMARY)
No. of children (in lakhs)
Provisional
APR 08- MAR 09 16
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

17. No of Children (PRIMARY)
No. of children (in lakhs)
DISE (Provisional)
DISE 08-09
STATE PROPOSAL
MDM-PAB Approval
09-10
OPTED MDM
AVAILED MDM 17
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

18. Time Series (UPPER PRIMARY)
No. of children (in lakhs)
Provisional
APR 08- MAR 09 18 18
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

19. No of Children (UPPER PRIMARY)
No. of children (in lakhs)
DISE 08-09
DISE 09-10(Provisional)
STATE PROPOSAL
MDM-PAB Approval
09-10
OPTED MDM
AVAILED MDM 19 19
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

20. No. of School days No Source of Data No of Days 1 DISE 200 2
MDM approval (09-10) 3
Benchmark(Q1+Q2+Q3)
165 4
Performance(Q1+Q2+Q3)
161 5
State Proposal: Primary
Upper Primary
220 20

21. Proposal for Kitchen –cum –storesNo
Item
No. 1
Total No. of Institutions
10074 2
Total Sanctioned (06-10)
5768 4
Gap
3723 5
State Proposal ( ) 21

22. Proposal for Kitchen DevicesNo
Item
No. 1
Total No. of Institutions
10074 2
Total Sanctioned (06-10)
9374 4
Gap
700 5
State Proposal ( ) 22 22

23. Cook-cum-helpers No Item No. 1 Total No. of Institutions 10074 2
Total requirement
22785 3
Already Sanctioned
7815 4
Balance requirement (2-3)
14970 23 23

24. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Thank You 24
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India