Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLeo Foster Modified over 6 years ago
1
Presented by The ASIS Agriculture and Food Security Council
ASIS International 53rd Annual Seminar and Exhibits 2007 Panel Discussion Agriculture and Food-borne Bioterrorism Facilitating Effective Prevention, Mitigation, Response, and Recovery Presented by The ASIS Agriculture and Food Security Council
2
Agenda Background Scenarios Observations Mitigation Strategies
Protecting the Brand
3
Background Definitions Food Safety – Ensuring that food is safe to eat based on proper processing techniques, shelf life, and other factors Food Security – Ensuring that food supplies are abundant to sustain populations Food Defense – Ensuring that food is protected from purposeful adulteration/terrorism Operationally, there is significant overlap. However, there are legal implications regarding these definitions.
4
Background Threats Inadvertent/non-terrorism contamination – occurs somewhat frequently and always a possibility Terrorism The Times, January 25, Britain’s laboratories ordered to strengthen security on stocks of more than 100 deadly viruses and bacteria MI5 warned that Islamic terrorists are training in germ warfare. Biological agents include polio, rabies, tuberculosis and avian flu. Food poisoning bacteria such as E. coli and the sources of a number of rare tropical and Middle Eastern illnesses are also included. Global Security Newswire, November 10, 2006 – The threat (of use of biological weapons arsenals) has shifted to terrorists and other non-state actors (Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Donald Mahley)
5
Background Recent FDA Recalls August 13, 2007 – Toothpaste manufactured in China recalled after shown to contain diethylene glycol (DEG) August 10, 2007 – 7,500 sandwiches recalled due to potential to be contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes August 7, 2007 – Herring recalled because the product may be contaminated with Clostridium botulinum August 3, 2007 – French Cut Green Beans in 14.5 ounce cans recalled because the product may not have been processed adequately to eliminate the potential for botulism toxin July 27, 2007 – A 51-year-old San Diego County woman contracted botulism after eating canned chili with beans July 21, 2007 – A large food company voluntarily expanded its recall of canned meat products originally announced on July 18 due to the risk of botulinum toxin Listeria - an organism which can cause serious and sometimes fatal infections in young children, frail or elderly people, and others with weakened immune systems. Although healthy individuals may suffer only short-term symptoms such as high fever, severe headache, stiffness, nausea, abdominal pain and diarrhea, Listeria infection can cause miscarriages and stillbirths among pregnant women.
6
Scenarios Spinach and E. Coli 0157:H7 First case reported by the State of Wisconsin in August 2006 Field sample test results were reported on October 12 26 states were affected and one case was confirmed in Canada 205 cases reported including 31 cases involving Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome 104 hospitalizations (over 50%) 3 deaths (ID, NE, WI) & 1 death likely (MD) $100 Million Sales and Crop Losses (UC)
7
Scenarios
8
Fresh Spinach Industry
Scenarios Fresh Spinach Industry $157 million (2005 Farm Value) 75% of US supply comes from California 31,000 acres 70% of California supply comes from Monterey County 3 billion servings of fresh spinach consumed annually Average American eats 2 pounds per year
9
National Spinach Unit Volume Sales (Source: AC Neilson)
Cello Spinach Bulk Spinach Joe- this is just a place holder slide. Will update this and label.-Kori
10
Illnesses were first reported to the CDC August 22 – September 5
Scenarios TIMELINE August 19, 2006 Illnesses were first reported to the CDC August 22 – September 5 82% of the total illnesses were reported 160 cases reported CDC begins to confirm through genetic fingerprinting the E. coli 0157:H7 strain September 13 CDC notifies the FDA of a multi-state food borne illness outbreak
11
FDA issues a consumer advisory not to eat bagged spinach
Scenarios September 14 FDA issues a consumer advisory not to eat bagged spinach Advisory is issued late in the evening, many news services don’t pick it up. 171 reported illnesses, 26 states, 50 confirmed September 15 Advisory is nationwide, retail markets and restaurants removing spinach from their shelves and menus.
12
Scenarios September 15 Natural Selections Foods issues a voluntary recall of all labels (30) and products containing spinach 94 confirmed illnesses September 17 River Ranch issues a voluntary recall of spinach products; raw product was purchased from NSF -- Bellissima, Dole -- Cheney Brothers -- Coastline -- Cross Valley -- D'Arrigo Brothers -- Earthbound Farm -- Emeril, Sysco -- Fresh Point -- Green Harvest -- Jansal Valley -- Mann -- Mills Family Farm -- Natural Selection Foods -- Nature's Basket -- O Organic (Safeway) -- Premium Fresh -- President's Choice -- Pride of San Juan -- Pro-Mark, Compliments -- ProAct -- Rave Spinach -- Ready Pac -- River Ranch, Superior -- Riverside Farms -- Snoboy -- Tanimura & Antle -- The Farmer's Market -- Trader Joe's
13
RLB Distributing (New Jersey) initiates a voluntary recall
Scenarios September 18 Media frenzy begins September 19 RLB Distributing (New Jersey) initiates a voluntary recall September 20 New Mexico Dept of Health confirms finding E .coli 0157:H7 in a bag of Dole baby spinach Code date P227 September 21 FDA narrows investigation to 9 farms in Monterey, Santa Clara, San Benito Counties of California Town Hall meeting in Salinas with FDA, CDHS
14
Trace back code P227 (packed August 15)
Scenarios September 22 Utah Dept of Health finds E .coli 0157:H7 in a bag of Dole baby spinach Trace back code P227 (packed August 15) FDA amends spinach advisory, restriction down to 3 county area (Monterey, Santa Clara, San Benito) S.T. Produce (Seattle) initiates a voluntary recall Pacific Coast Fruit Co (Portland) initiates a voluntary recall Work begins on the Short Term Action Plan
15
187 cases of illness in 26 states & Canada
Scenarios September 29 FDA lifts the consumer advisory on spinach from the 3 county area of California September 30 187 cases of illness in 26 states & Canada 5 firms issuing product recalls 10 confirmed product samples with E .coli 0157:H7 in 8 states FDA declares the outbreak to be over
16
FBI issue search warrants at NSF, Growers Express and Primus Labs
Scenarios October 2 Spinach harvest resumes following Guidelines of the Short Term Action Plan October 4 FBI issue search warrants at NSF, Growers Express and Primus Labs
17
A two year old boy in Idaho 81 year old women in Nebraska
Scenarios October 6 3 deaths are confirmed A two year old boy in Idaho 81 year old women in Nebraska 77 year old women in Wisconsin October 8 The Nunes Co voluntarily recalls green leaf lettuce following water test results of irrigation water used on the crop October 10 Meeting with regulators in Sacramento to request the industry’s need for mandatory food safety standards
18
FDA investigation narrows to 4 farms
Scenarios October 12 FDA investigation narrows to 4 farms E. coli strain isolated in cow manure near one of the farms Potential sources of contamination Contaminated irrigation water Wildlife intrusion, wild pigs Use of animal based soil amendments/manures Concern over the 4 Ws Water Wildlife Workers Waste (Manures)
19
- Flooding - Animal Activity - Adjacent Land Use October
Scenarios October Legislative Hearings by State Senator Florez: PRODUCE CONTAMINATION HITS POLITICAL BATTLEFIELD: A California senator plans to call for a state-monitored system that tracks produce and holds growers more accountable for food safety, but a farming association is proposing a self-regulating system that puts the onus on handlers and shippers to protect against E. coli and other contaminants. -The New York Times Buyers group sets expectations of mandatory, uniform food safety standards with letter to industry (October 26) Development of Best Management Practices (WGA) Water Sources Water Use Soil Amendments - Flooding - Animal Activity - Adjacent Land Use
20
Taco Bell illness outbreak (Northeast) 71 illnesses, 53 hospitalized
Scenarios November/December Taco Bell illness outbreak (Northeast) 71 illnesses, 53 hospitalized 8 HUS, no deaths Taco John illness outbreak (Minnesota & Iowa) 81 illnesses, 26 hospitalized 2 HUS, no deaths While unrelated, the likely cause of contamination was chopped lettuce grown in the Central Valley
21
California Leafy Greens Marketing Agreement is certified
Scenarios January 2007 CDFA holds public hearings on the formation of a marketing agreement binding handlers to mandatory food safety practices for lettuce and leafy greens February California Leafy Greens Marketing Agreement is certified Advisory Board met for the first time Feb 23 Legislation is introduced to make CDHS the governing food safety body in California
22
California Leafy Green Products Handler Marketing Agreement (LGMA)
Scenarios California Leafy Green Products Handler Marketing Agreement (LGMA) Industry sponsored standards enforced by CDFA Voluntary signatories – contractually bound Funded by per carton assessment - 2 cents Inspections by state auditors for compliance Use of a seal or mark to indicate compliance
23
FDA & CDHS issue their Final Report Paicines Ranch – Mission Organics
Scenarios March FDA & CDHS issue their Final Report Paicines Ranch – Mission Organics Inconclusive on exact source of contamination Areas of concern Contaminated irrigation water Animal intrusion – feral pigs Field proximity and adjacent land use – cattle grazing Issues of sanitary practices at the processing plant
24
Leafy Greens Marketing Agreement Begins Best Management Practices
Scenarios April Leafy Greens Marketing Agreement Begins Best Management Practices Audit Program by CDFA Inspectors Mandatory Seal attached to Bills of Lading Web site: caleafygreens.ca.gov Model Program for National Initiative California - 99% of members in the program
25
Pet Food Recall - Melamine
Scenarios Pet Food Recall - Melamine Found in wheat gluten imported from China – caused recall of 60 million cans and pouches of dog and cat food in mid-March of 2007 Rice protein concentrate also found to contain melamine April 19 – California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) labs detected melamine in urine from hogs at the American Hog Farm in Ceres, CA FDA is working with CDFA to study the issue FDA and USDA believe the likelihood of illness after eating pork from swine fed the contaminated product would be very low April 26 – Swine known to have been fed adulterated product will not be approved to enter the food supply (USDA cannot rule out the possibility that food produced from animals fed this product could also be adulterated)
26
Pet Food Recall - Melamine
Scenarios Pet Food Recall - Melamine Rice protein concentrate imported by Wilbur-Ellis beginning in August 2006 – company did not become aware of the contamination until April 2007 FDA has determined the rice protein was used in the production of pet food and a portion of the pet food was used to produce animal feed Ongoing investigation is tracing products distributed since August 2006 by Wilbur-Ellis throughout the distribution chain No evidence of harm to humans associated with the processed pork product – no recall of meat products processed from these animals is being issued
27
Pet Food Recall - Melamine
Scenarios Pet Food Recall - Melamine Testing and joint investigation continue – evidence indicating harm to humans will necessitate appropriate actions Neither FDA nor USDA has uncovered any evidence of harm to the swine from the contaminated feed. Dilutional factor and lack of evidence of illnesses in swine fed the waste pet food – low probability of human illness Centers for Disease Control and Prevention systems have limited ability to detect subtle problems due to melamine and melamine-related compounds FDA is developing and implementing further tests and risk assessments based on toxicity of the compounds and how much consumers could be expected to actually consume States believed to have received and used contaminated product: California, Kansas, New York, North Carolina, South Carolina and Utah
28
Potential Causal Factors
Observations Potential Causal Factors Spinach Human sources Migrant workers Inappropriate facilities Accidental/purposeful? Natural sources Animals – domesticated and wild
29
Potential Causal Factors
Observations Potential Causal Factors Spinach Natural conditions Depth to ground water (water table) Surface water sources Soil type Process issues Poor drainage Poor washing techniques Irrigation, etc.
30
Potential Causal Factors
Observations Potential Causal Factors Melamine Accidental introduction Industrial crime Upping the protein concentration Sabotage Terrorism/purposeful introduction
31
Observations What if? Had the spinach scenario been a purposeful, wide-spread adulteration scenario: Lag between case reporting and field investigation (34 days) would have yielded increased morbidity and mortality Probability of apprehending perpetrators would be near zero State-to-state consistency in reporting is sporadic Normal food safety protocols ineffective – contaminated water is “entrained” in the spinach
32
Observations Contributing Factors Import inspection/testing – private and government Fewer FDA field inspectors today than pre-September 11, 2001 Approximately three percent of all products entering American ports are inspected Lack of supply chain management protocol Enormous lag in importation and identification of a problem
33
Domestic Issues Border inspectors
Mitigation Strategies Domestic Issues Border inspectors Need better guidance on potential foreign animal diseases and other product inspection guidelines Inspection resources must be bolstered to handle the magnitude of international passengers and cargo New technology used to scan shipments must be used more consistently Best management practices are needed to provide management objectives and tactics to ensure security Lab capacity must be bolstered to allow more rapid identification of diseases
34
Domestic Issues Epidemiological standards should be established:
Mitigation Strategies Domestic Issues Epidemiological standards should be established: PulseNet - A national network of public health and food regulatory agency laboratories coordinated by the CDC. Impeded by lack of consistent data. Law enforcement must be participatory in food defense Require more training for investigation and personal safety Should work in tandem with food and public health agencies Private/Public Sector Partnerships – To augment regulatory oversight, the private sector must step up food defense strategies in consultation with the government
35
International Issues Challenges Benefits of International Cooperation
Mitigation Strategies International Issues Challenges Food imports are increasing rapidly-few are inspected Countries are more interdependent to meet demand Differing standards = greater opportunity for contamination, whether accidental or purposeful Ever present threat of inadvertent or purposeful contamination Benefits of International Cooperation Food-related events and scientific advances in one country often have a direct effect on other regions Example: Better information regarding Highly Pathogenic Avia Influenza is available in SE Asia Coordinated strategies yield better prospects for success Better, faster intelligence regarding terrorism
36
Food Processing, Wholesale and Retail
Mitigation Strategies Food Processing, Wholesale and Retail Personnel Security Background checks – even cursory checks are better than nothing Visitor policies – no one should be unattended Supply Chain Validation Know your suppliers (recent pet food adulteration) Allows more confidence in prevention efforts Allows better tracking capability in response posture Coordinate with public health and agriculture departments Understand their needs Understand potential timelines – facilitate faster response Know your role Develop/review/revise all applicable response plans to address food defense Emergency Response Plans Continuity of Operations Plans Communications Plans Contingency Plans
37
Farm Level Mitigation Strategies Security Supply Chain Validation
Report suspicious behavior Supply Chain Validation Know your animal/feed/veterinary suppliers Understand Agriculture Department procedures Foreign Animal Disease Plans Reporting requirements Know your role Develop/review/revise plan(s) Animal Isolation Plan Contingency Plans Understand the signs and symptoms of disease Be aware of potential sources of contamination Human Natural
38
The Importance of Brand
Protecting the Brand The Importance of Brand Kleenex Tylenol Farmland Exxon Consumer polls indicate that food safety and nutrition is the number one concern in making food buying decisions
39
Brand Strategies Prevention Internal External Government interaction
Protecting the Brand Brand Strategies Prevention Internal External Government interaction Responsive Fast and Professional Effective and Efficient Honest and Forthcoming Recovery After Action Review/Root Cause Analysis Improved Systems/Best Management Practices Continued Honesty and Commitment to Quality
40
Questions? William Ramsey McCormick & Company, Inc. 18 Loveton Circle
Sparks, Maryland 21152 Phone: Michael Steinle Beck Disaster Recovery 2210 Inverness Drive Lawrence, Kansas 66047 Phone: Craig Watz Federal Bureau of Investigation Kansas City Field Office 1300 Summit Kansas City, Missouri 64105 Phone: Dr. Mike Fagel, CEM Domestic Preparedness Operations 837 Hoyden Court, Suite 201 Aurora, Illinois 60506 Phone:
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.