1. Chapter 8 Decision Making
CONSUMER BEHAVIOR, 10e Michael R. Solomon
Chapter 8 explains how consumers go about making decisions.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

2. When you finish this chapter, you should understand why:
Chapter Objectives
When you finish this chapter, you should understand why:
Consumer decision making is a central part of consumer behavior, but the way we evaluate and choose products varies widely.
A decision is actually composed of a series of stages that results in the selection of one product over competing options.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

3. Chapter Objectives (continued)
Decision making is not always rational.
Our access to online sources is changing the way we decide what to buy.
We often fall back on well-learned “rules-of-thumb” to make decisions.
Consumers rely upon different decision rules when evaluating competing options.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

4. Learning Objective 1
Consumer decision making is a central part of consumer behavior, but the way we evaluate and choose products varies widely.
Sometimes consumers are rational and sometimes they are not. We buy things at times with no advance planning, on an impulse, or do something different from what we intended. We also react to purchase momentum which is when an initial impulse purchase increases the likelihood that we will buy even more.
People do have different cognitive processing styles. Some tend to have a rational system that processes information analytically and sequentially using roles of logic while others rely on an experiential system of cognition that processes information more holistically and in parallel.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

5. Figure 8.1 Stages in Consumer Decision Making
When consumers make decisions, they go through a series of steps. These include problem recognition, information search, evaluation of alternatives, and product choice.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

6. Figure 8.2 Continuum of Buying Decision Behavior
It can help us to understand the decision-making process when we think about the amount of effort that goes into a decision each time we must make it. Consumer researchers think of decision effort on a continuum. On one end we have habitual decision making and at the other, there is extended problem solving. Many decisions fall somewhere in between, which we refer to as limited problem solving. Habitual or routine response behavior is for low involvement products and these decisions are made mostly out of habit. Limited problem solving involves using decision rules to make choices. Extended problem solving is for high risk choices.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

7. For Reflection
Is it a problem that consumers have too many choices? Would it be better to have less choices? How does it affect consumer decision-making?
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

8. Learning Objective 2
A decision is actually composed of a series of stages that results in the selection of one product over competing options.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

9. Figure 8.1: Steps in the Decision-Making Process
Problem recognition
Information search
Evaluation of alternatives
These are the basic four steps in the decision making process shown in Figure 8.1. The next several slides provide more details on these four steps.
Product choice
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

10. Figure 8.3 Problem Recognition
This figure illustrates the two causes of problem recognition.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

11. Stage 1: Problem Recognition
Occurs when consumer sees difference between current state and ideal state
Need recognition: actual state declines
Opportunity recognition: ideal state moves upward
Problem recognition is the first stage. It can occur when a consumer’s state of being declines (which then triggers a desire to return to normalcy) or when a consumer recognizes an ideal state he or she wishes to achieve. In this Dutch ad, the child’s parents recognize a need to go to the movies.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

12. Stage 2: Information Search
The process by which we survey the environment for appropriate data to make a reasonable decision
Prepurchase or ongoing search
Internal or external search
Online search
Once we know we have a problem, we search out how we can solve the problem. These searches will typically take place before purchase (prepurchase). However, many people just enjoy searching information and they conduct ongoing searches even if a purchase is not immediately forthcoming. Internal searches are based on our own memory banks while external sources come from other sources. Search engines have made vast amounts of information available to us as we search out product information.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

13. Table 8.2 A Framework for Consumer Information Search
Prepurchase versus Ongoing Search
Prepurchase Search
Ongoing Search
Determinants
Involvement with purchase
Involvement with product
Motives
Making better purchase decisions
Building a bank of information for future use
Outcomes
Better purchase decisions
Increased impulse buying
This framework explains the differences between prepurchase and ongoing searches. The motives are entirely different as are the outcomes. However the determinants are quite similar.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

14. Search for Information
Internal search:
Retrieving knowledge from memory or genetic tendencies
External search:
Collecting information from peers, family, and the marketplace

15. Need Recognition Internal Search Search Stimuli Comprehension
CDP Model
Need Recognition
Internal Search
Search
Stimuli
Exposure
External Search
Attention M E
MORY
Comprehension
Peers
Family
Marketplace
Acceptance
Retention

16. Internal Search

17. External Search
When motivated by an upcoming purchase decision, external search is known as pre-purchase search
When information acquisition takes place on a relatively regular basis, regardless of sporadic purchase needs, it is known as ongoing search

18. Deliberate versus “Accidental” Search
Directed learning: existing product knowledge obtained from previous information search or experience of alternatives
Incidental learning: mere exposure over time to conditioned stimuli and observations of others
Directed learning means we know about a product because we have previously sought out information about that product. Accidental search means that we are more passive. We learn about information because over time we experience exposures to brand information. This is sometimes called low-dose advertising.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

19. What to Search?
Choice ALTERNATIVES (brands, offerings) referred to as the external search set and contributes to the “awareness set”, “evoked/retrieval set”, and “consideration set”.
Choice CRITERIA that include attributes addressing price, quality, convenience, performance, popularity, eco-friendliness, etc.

20. Where to Search?
The different External SOURCES of informational include:

21. Consumer Search on the Internet
Many consumers search with Online, Social-Media, and Mobile platforms

22. Consumer Search on the Internet
Internet/Online search words or phrases used by consumers fall into three categories:
70% Generic terms; representing brand categories
20% Specific retailers;-- Best Buy, Wal-Mart, Amazon
10% Specific products – iPhone, Beats Headphones, Nike athletic shoes, etc.
Social Media search cues are driven by “Likes” and Third Party Evaluations from Google or Amazon.com
Mobile search is automated by “Apps” tailored to certain merchandise, service, and store types

23. How Much to Search? A Cost-Benefit Perspective determines:
How Much people search, when the perceived benefit of the new information is greater than perceived cost.
This results in an “n-shaped” curve, from “Novice” to “Expert” with an initial rise to peak, then diminishing returns of acquiring the information

24. Figure 8.5 Amount of Information Search and Product Knowledge
This figure shows us that there is an inverted-U relationship between knowledge and external search effort. People with very limited expertise may not feel they are competent to search extensively. Experts have a better sense of what information is relevant so they engage in selective search. Novice consumers tend to process information in terms of the big picture instead of detailed information. Who searches the most? Moderately knowledgeable consumers.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

25. Search is NOT Always Rational
Some consumers avoid external search, especially with minimal time to do so and with durable goods (e.g. autos)
Symbolic offerings like jewelry, perfume, or fashion require more subjective search
Brand signaling and switching is a Mental Heuristic used for ambiguous choices
Variety Seeking is used to choose new alternatives over more familiar ones
Clearly we don’t always engage in rational search processes to identify each alternative before we make a choice. In fact, the amount of external search we do is surprisingly small. In addition, low-income shoppers who have the most to lose for making poor purchase decisions do the least amount of information search. The more symbolic of our identity a product is, the more search we will tend to do. Sometimes we switch brands, even if the brand we formerly chose still meets our needs. This may be related to variety seeking, a desire to choose new alternatives over more familiar ones.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

26. Biases in Decision-Making SEARCH Process
Mental accounting: framing a problem in terms of gains/losses influences our decisions
Sunk-cost fallacy: We are reluctant to waste something we have paid for
Loss aversion: We emphasize losses over gains
Prospect theory: risk differs for gains vs losses
The way people adjust decisions based on the cost of the product and the situation can be explained using the principles of mental accounting. We frame our problems in ways that influence whether we perceive our possible decisions as gains or losses. People are prone to a bias called the sunk-cost fallacy. If we’ve paid for something, we are more reluctant to waste it, even though the value of the item does not change whether it was given to us or we paid for it.
Loss aversion is another bias. It means that losing money is more painful to us than gaining money is pleasant.
Prospect theory describes how people make choices. It defines the utility in terms of gains and losses.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

27. Figure 8.6 Five Types of Perceived Risk
Monetary risk
Functional risk
Physical risk
Social risk
Figure 8.6 reviews the five types of perceived risk and provides examples. Monetary risk occurs when making a poor choice will have a monetary consequence. Any purchase that costs a lot is subject to this risk. Functional risk is the risk that the product may not function as the consumer needs. Physical risk is the risk that the choice may physically threaten the consumer. Social risk is the risk that the choice will reflect poorly on the consumer and damage his or her self-esteem or confidence. Psychological risk is the risk that one may lose self-respect due to making a bad decision. For instance, expensive luxury goods could cause the consumer to feel extensive guilt.
Psychological risk
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

28. ALTERNATIVES FOR EVALUATION
Total Market (“Universal”) Availability Set
(all available alternatives for problem/need)
Awareness Set
(awareness of available alternatives from internal/external search)
Evoked (“Retrieval”) Set
(usually recalled for problem/need from internal/external search)
“Share of Mind”
The alternatives a consumer knows about is the evoked set. The ones actually considered make up the consideration set. In this ad for Sunkist lemons, the goal is to illustrate lemons as a possible alternative to salt.
Included in Solomon Text
Consideration Set
(actual internal/external search set considered for purchase/use)
“Share of Wallet”

29. Constructing the Consideration Set Primarily from Memory
Retrieval set: consideration set that depends on recall of alternatives from memory
Not all alternatives retrieved from memory will be considered
Consumers limit their consideration to those alternatives toward which they are favorably predisposed

30. Alternatives & Evaluation Criteria Internal & External Search
Pre-purchase Evaluation
“EVOKED SET”
Alternatives & Evaluation Criteria
from
Internal & External Search

31. Figure 8.7 Levels of Abstraction
We cognitively represent information we have about products in knowledge structures. The term refers to a set of beliefs and the way we organize these beliefs in our minds. These structures matter to marketers because we need to ensure consumers are categorizing product information correctly. We typically represent a product in a cognitive structure at one of three levels. The subordinate category often includes individual brands. The superordinate category is more abstract. The middle level is the basic level. It is the most useful for classifying products. It groups things together based on commonalities but still permit a broad range of alternatives.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

32. Strategic Implications of Product Categorization
Position a product
Identify competitors
Create an exemplar product
Locate products in a store
The way we categorize products has a lot of strategic implications. That’s because the process affects which products consumers will compare to our product and also the criteria they use to decide which brand they like.
The success of a positioning strategy hinges on the marketer’s ability to convince the consumer to consider its product within a given category. At the abstract, superordinate level, many different product forms compete for membership. The characteristics of category exemplars tend to exert a disproportionate influence on how people think of the category in general. The brands that are strongly associated with a category get to define the criteria we use to evaluate all category members. Product categorization can affect consumers’ expectations regarding the places they can locate a desired product.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

33. EVALUATION with DECISION RULES: How We Decide On the Best Choice
Once a Search of relevant alternatives and criteria is completed for Problems, using brand categories, we analyze and choose
Decision rules for product choice can be very simple or very complicated
-- Prior experience with (similar) product
-- Present information at time of purchase
-- Beliefs about brands (from advertising)
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

34. General EVALUATION Approaches
Rely on preexisting product evaluations stored in memory
Direct Experience: prior purchase or consumption experiences with product
Indirect Experience: experiences or impressions gained second-hand
Construct new evaluations based on information acquired through internal or external search

35. Analyzing Determinant Criterion
It should point out that there are significant differences among brands on the attribute
It should supply the consumer with a decision-making rule, such as “If-Then”
It should convey a rule that is consistent with decisions from prior occasions
Marketers can influence with ads/education
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

36. Categorizing for EVALUATION
The Categorization Process: the evaluation of a choice alternative based on the evaluation of the category to which it is assigned
Categories are general (drinks) or specific (colas)
Evaluation of a category can be transferred to a new product assigned to that category
Brand extensions allow firms to use categorization to their advantage

37. EVALUTION Strategies as Decision Rules
Noncompensatory Evaluation Strategies: a product’s weakness on one attribute cannot be offset by strong performance on another attribute

38. EVALUTION Strategies as Decision Rules
Noncompensatory Evaluation Strategies
Lexicographic strategy: brands are compared initially on the one most important attribute, and the winner is chosen. If more than one is evaluated similarly on that attribute, the second most important is considered, and so on, until a winner is identified.
Elimination by aspects: similar to the lexicographic strategy; however, the consumer imposes cutoffs
Conjunctive strategy: each brand is compared, one at a time, against a set of cutoffs which is established for each salient attribute. If a brand meets the cutoffs for all attributes, it is chosen.

39. EVALUTION Strategies as Decision Rules
Noncompensatory Evaluation Strategies
See also Table 8.3 for TV sets in the textbook

40. EVALUTION Strategies as Decision Rules
Compensatory Evaluation Strategies:
a perceived weakness of one attribute may be offset or compensated for by the perceived strength of another attribute
Simple additive: the consumer counts or adds the number of times each alternative is judged favorably in terms of the set of salient evaluative criteria. The alternative with the largest number of positive attributes is chosen.
Weighted additive: judgments about an alternative’s attribute performance are weighted by the attribute’s importance. The alternative with the best overall performance is chosen.

41. EVALUTION Strategies as Decision Rules
COMPENSATORY DECISION RULES
Simple Additive
BRANDS
PRICE
(1-5)
QUALITY
CONVENIENCE
TOTAL A 4 2 5 11 B 9
Weighted Additive
BRANDS
PRICE (20%)
(1-5)
QUALITY (50%)
CONVENIENCE (30%)
TOTAL
(100%) A
4 x .2 = 0.8
2 x .5 = 1
5 x .3 = 1.5
3.3 B
2 x .2 = 0.4
5 x .5 = 2.5
2 x .3 = 0.6
3.5
See also Table 8.3 for TV sets in the textbook

42. Neuromarketing
Uses functional magnetic resonance imaging, a brain-scanning device that tracks blood flow as we perform mental tasks
Marketers measure consumers’ reactions to movie trailers, choices about automobiles, the appeal of a pretty face, and loyalty to specific brands
Researchers discovered that regions in the brain are dynamic switchboards that blend memory, emotions, and biochemical triggers. These interconnected neurons shape the ways that fear, panic, exhilaration, and social pressure influence our choices.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

43. The Web delivers enormous amounts of product information in seconds
Cybermediaries
The Web delivers enormous amounts of product information in seconds
Cybermediary: helps filter and organize online market information
Examples: Shopping.com, BizRate.com
Cybermediaries help to filter and organize market information online so that consumers can identify and evaluate alternatives more efficiently.
Cybermediaries can take different forms including directories and portals and forums, fan clubs, and user groups.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

44. Learning Objective 5
We often fall back on well-learned “rules-of-thumb” as HEURISTICS to make choices.
Heuristics help us to make efficient decisions. In this ad, the character is using a heuristic. She wants only yellow items for her party.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

45. Heuristics Product Signals Market Beliefs Country of Origin
A product signal infers hidden dimensions of products from attributes we observe. The product signal communicates an underlying quality. For instance, someone selling a used car will try to make the car look clean because cleanliness may be associated with reliability. Market beliefs are assumptions we have about a company or product. The beliefs then guide our decisions. For instance, someone may go to look at televisions at Best Buy instead of Target because he assumes that an electronics store would have a better selection. Country of origin is often a determinant attribute in the decision-making process. Consumers think of Switzerland for precision in watches, Italy for leather goods, and France for wine.
Country of Origin
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

46. Choosing Familiar Brand Names
Zipf’s Law: our tendency to prefer a number one brand to the competition
Consumer inertia: the tendency to buy a brand out of habit merely because it requires less effort
Brand loyalty: repeat purchasing behavior that reflects a conscious decision to continue buying the same brand
Choosing a well-known brand is a powerful heuristic. People tend to prefer a number one brand to the competition. This is known as Zipf’s Law. Inertia can also explain why people choose a familiar brand. It means that we do so just out of laziness and a desire to expend little effort. Lastly, people may choose the same brands out of brand loyalty.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

47. Decision making is not always rational
Chapter Summary
Decision making is a central part of consumer behavior and decisions are made in stages
Decision making is not always rational
We use rules of thumb and decision rules to make decisions more efficiently
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall