1. Konawaena Middle School DataSY
*from alohahsap.org as of August 1, 2016

2. Purpose Preview of preliminary data
Anchor points for possible instructional planning
Reflect/List questions
Looking first at data that is a part of the state’s STRIVE HI system.
Data comes from alohahsap.org – state’s “clearinghouse” for school data. It includes results for students enrolled in a school who took the test.
STRIVE HI will take this data and filter out the results for students who were enrolled a full school “calendar” year. Schools are held accountable for students enrolled a full year = not students who were here couple of months etc.
This means what you see today may be somewhat different than the official STRIVE HI results later; however, the results are generally not drastically different.
This just keeps you in the loop and provide anchor points for possible instructional planning. The data may point to areas you want to target as a teacher or PLC, questions you want to ask or things you want to reinforce.
You will have time periodically to reflect on the information you are receiving and talk with your peers.
If we don’t get to all of your questions today – my contact info is at the end of the presentation. Send me your questions, and I will follow-up with you as soon as I can.

3. What data is currently available?
Smarter Balanced Assessment (SBA) data
New state assessment aligned to Common Core State Standards
Literacy and Math
Overall proficiency rate/comparisons
Progress over time
*There is more specific strand and target data – PLC time
1st set of data that is a part of the STRIVE HI system.

4. Konawaena Middle School: 6th Grade ELA State Assessment % Proficient, 2012-2016

5. 6th ELA SBA SBA Score 14-15 15-16 1 28% 24% 2 29% 23% 3 32% 37% 4 11%
16%

6. Konawaena Middle School: 7th Grade ELA State Assessment % Proficient, 2012-2016

7. 7th ELA SBA SBA Score 14-15 15-16 1 29% 23% 2 25% 20% 3 35% 41% 4 11%
16%

8. Konawaena Middle School: 8th Grade ELA State Assessment % Proficient, 2012-2016

9. 8th ELA SBA SBA Score 14-15 15-16 1 27% 26% 2 25% 32% 3 39% 31% 4 10%
12%

10. Konawaena Middle School: 6th Grade Math State Assessment % Proficient, 2012-2016

11. 6th Math SBA SBA Score 14-15 15-16 1 40% 36% 2 30% 31% 3 22% 25% 4 7%8%

12. Konawaena Middle School: 7th Grade Math State Assessment % Proficient, 2012-2016

13. 7th Math SBA
SBA Score
14-15
15-16 1
32%
28% 2
35% 3
25% 4
11%
12%

14. Konawaena Middle School: 8th Grade Math State Assessment % Proficient, 2012-2016

15. 8th Math SBA SBA Score 14-15 15-16 1 42% 40% 2 28% 30% 3 13% 20% 4 18%
10%

16. What data is currently available?
SCIENCE
Hawaii State Assessment (HSA) – 8th Grade
Aligned to Hawaii Content Performance Standards for Science (HCPS III)
STRIVE HI also looks at data from science. These assessments are – Biology I at the high school level and the HSA at grades 8 and 4.

17. Konawaena Middle School: 8th Grade Science State Assessment % Proficient, 2012-2016

18. 8th Science HSA SBA Score 14-15 15-16 1 26% 25% 2 45% 46% 3 24% 4 5%3%

19. Proficiency Targets School Literacy Trends
SBA ELA Performance Relative to Proficiency
Reading
+Performance is Above the Proficiency Standard
- Performance is Below the Proficiency Standard
Language Use (6-8)
1Word Meanings (6-8)
Writing, Research, Listening
+ Better than the rest of the test
- Worse than the rest of the test
Compose Full Narrative Text (6-8)
2Compose Full Explanatory (6,7)
3Compose Full Argument Text (7, 8)
Use evidence (6-8)
Evaluate Info./Sources (6,7)
Analyze & Integrate Information (6,7)
4Write/revise Brief Text (6-8)
Language & Vocab Use (6-8)
Editing (6-8)
7th was close in informational
Composing full explanatory text was below for 8th grade
3. 6th grade did not have enough evidence (most likely items) for argument data
4. 6th and 8th were close in explanatory

20. EOC Data

21. Algebra I: Proficiency Comparisons

22. Algebra I: Reporting Categories

23. Algebra I Benchmark Data
Benchmark reports are available for EOC assessments. They provide a look at how students did on different benchmarks. The data will provide a comparison of progress with each benchmark as related to the test as a whole.

24. Algebra I Algebraic Concepts & Procedures Modeling & Problem Solving
Benchmark
Strengths +
Weaknesses -
Algebraic Concepts & Procedures
Solving quadratic equations…
Solve systems of linear equations
Explain why the x-coordinates...
Use function notations, evaluate functions for inputs, interpret statements that use function notation
Calculate and interpret avg. rate of change of function
Choose/produce equivalent form of expression to reveal and explain properties
Explain each step in solving a simple equation
Solve linear and inequalities/1 variable
Graph solutions to linear equations
Compare properties of two functions represented in two different ways
Modeling & Problem Solving
Interpret parameters in a linear, quadratic or exponential function
Interpret slope/intercetp of linear model
Create equations and inequalities in 1 variable
Relate domain of function to its graph
Write a function defined by a expression in different but equivalent forms
Represent data on 2 quantitative variables on a scatter plot

25. Aspire, 8th Grade Percentage Scoring as Ready
New assessment – can’t compare to old EXPLORE and PLAN.
This report shows the percentage of students who are on track to meet the benchmarks on the 11th grade ACT. If they maintain their current trajectory, they will at least meet the benchmarks on ACT.

26. Aspire, 8th Grade Performance Levels/National Ready
English
Reading
Math
Science
English
Reading
Math
Science
Ready
61%
33%
29%
Close
27%
31%
36%
24%
Needs Support
13%
35%
47%