Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Peer Review DINO July 9, 2003.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Peer Review DINO July 9, 2003."— Presentation transcript:

1 Peer Review DINO July 9, 2003

2 Agenda Overview ADCS C&DH COMM PWR Science Software Structures Thermal
Systems CM Actions and Review Summary September 16, 2018

3 Overview Purpose: For everyone to understand the satellite at a systems level, help other subsystems with their current design, and to determine that interfaces between subsystems are correct. Action Item forms September 16, 2018

4 Jeff Parker Stephen Stankevich
ADCS Peer Review Jeff Parker Stephen Stankevich

5 Requirements Maintain attitude knowledge to within 2°.
Control s/c in 60° cone for boom deployment. Maintain control in roll/pitch axis to +/- 10°. Maintain yaw control per science requirements ~ +/- 10°. September 16, 2018

6 Requirements System use of less than 2kg and 4W Weight Power
Actuators < 1.5kg Sensors < 1.5kg More weight allotment possible Power and < 2.5W Sensors < 1W September 16, 2018

7 Possible Hardware Sensors Actuator Magnetometer Sun Sensor
Earth Sensor Rate Gyro GPS Actuator Torque Rod/Coil Reaction Wheel September 16, 2018

8 Sensor Trade Studies Magnetometer Sun Sensor Earth Sensor Rate Gyro
Low cost, low weight, low power Effective measurement of field to compare with model. Sun Sensor Accurate measurement of s/c - sun direction vector in 2 axis. Earth Sensor Medium weight and power draw Very accurate measurement of earth horizon (Yaw Axis). Rate Gyro Large weight and expense Excellent measure of s/c rotation rates. September 16, 2018

9 Sensors Magnetometer Sun Sensor Honeywell HMC2003 100g 20mA @ 12V
40μGauss Resolution with +/- 2 Gauss Range $200 Sun Sensor Possible donation from Ithaco Space Systems September 16, 2018

10 Torque Rods Less complex and lighter than reaction wheels.
Commonly made of cylindrical iron core wrapped with copper wire. The output is a magnetic dipole moment based on the current passed through the wire, # of turns of wire, and area of the rod. (M=INA) Dipole moment interacts with Earth’s magnetic field to create the desired torque. (T = MxB) Need to actuate torque rods as multiple current levels. September 16, 2018

11 Torquer Sizing Power Length = 0.75” Diameter = 1.8” Moment = 1 A*m2
I = 150 mA V = 5V P = 0.75 W Length = 0.75” Diameter = 1.8” Moment = 1 A*m2 Mass < 0.3 kg Power Dissipation < 0.02 W # Turns ~ 40 September 16, 2018

12 Slew Times Torque Rods will not allow for immediate slew maneuvers of the s/c The larger the torque rods the quicker the slew times. September 16, 2018

13 Converters A/D Converters will be needed for the magnetometer and sun sensors Intersil HI7188 for magnetometer 8 Channel, 16 Bit 5V D/A converter may be necessary for torque rods September 16, 2018

14 ADCS Control Diagram September 16, 2018

15 ADCS Flow Diagram September 16, 2018

16 C&DH Peer Review

17 Why RPX_LITE? Processor: MPC823E Software compatibility
Supports necessary interfaces Lightweight, low power September 16, 2018

18 Requirements Imposed by EPS:
1 RS-232 serial port for subsystems control Current Sensor readings? General purpose I/O Lines? September 16, 2018

19 Requirements Imposed by COMM
1 dedicated RS-232 serial port to TNC 1 RS-232 serial port to radios September 16, 2018

20 Requirements Imposed by Science
Multiple USB ports for cameras. I think Science should be responsible for USB hub Control lines? September 16, 2018

21 Requirements Imposed by ADCS
16 bit ADC with 4 channels (minimum) September 16, 2018

22 Requirements Imposed by Tip-Mass
802.11b link between main satellite and tip-mass September 16, 2018

23 Other Requirements? Structures -? Thermal September 16, 2018

24 Interface Board FLIGHT COMPUTER USB I2C TIP-MASS SCIENCE USB HUB
General Purpose I/O Pins USB RESET SMC1 SMC2 I2C PCMCIA TIP-MASS SCIENCE USB HUB RS232 DRIVER RS232 Serial 802.11b MULTIPLEXER CPLD CPLD ADC INTERFACE BOARD ADCS TNC RADIO EPS Multiple Wires COMM Wireless

25 Power Needs FLIGHT COMPUTER (5V, 1A) USB I2C TIP-MASS RS232 Serial
General Purpose I/O Pins USB RESET SMC1 SMC2 I2C PCMCIA TIP-MASS RS232 Serial RS232 DRIVER (5V, 7mA) SCIENCE USB HUB (5V min) 802.11b (5V, 1A) MULTIPLEXER (5V) CPLD CPLD (5V, 150mA) ADC INTERFACE BOARD ADCS TNC RADIO EPS Multiple Wires COMM Wireless

26 Communication System DINO Peer Review July 9, 2003

27 Subsystem Block Diagram
September 16, 2018

28 Power Requirements Daytime Operation
Receiver: 0.54 W (6 V, 90 mA) always. TNC: 5.52 W (13.8 V, 400 mA) always. Transmitter: 8.4 W (6 V, 1.4 A) for approx. 2 minutes, otherwise same as Receiver (0.54 W). September 16, 2018

29 Power Requirements Nighttime Operation Safe Mode
Receiver: 0.54 W (6 V, 90 mA) always. TNC: 5.52 W (13.8 V, 400 mA) always. Transmitter: 8.4 W (6 V, 1.4 A) for approx. 4 seconds, otherwise same as Receiver (0.54 W). Safe Mode Same as nighttime. September 16, 2018

30 Calculating Transmission Time
Time needed to send one packet: 10 bits/byte * 256 bytes/packet  9600 bits/sec = sec/packet Total transmission time (assuming 50 kB per pass during daytime): 0.267 sec/packet * 50 kB/pass  256 bytes/packet = 52 sec/pass September 16, 2018

31 Transceiver Trade Study: Four Choices
ICOM IC-ID1 1.2 GHz digital Pros Allows for small antenna Built-in TNC with kbps baud rate USB interface Cons Expensive Only one frequency band: need half-duplex comm. Newly released, untested, unlicensed by FCC Needs new ground equipment September 16, 2018

32 Transceiver Trade Study
Kenwood TH-D7 dual band 70 cm/ 2 m Pros Operates in 2 frequency bands One third of the cost of the ICOM radio Compatible ground equipment already set up Previous experience from other missions Cons Max. baud rate of 9.6 kbps. Requires larger antenna than ICOM Uses RS-232 interface September 16, 2018

33 Transceiver Trade Study
TEKK SD-5200 synthesized radio and TEKK KS-960 crystal radio Pros Can be set to one frequency by the manufacturer: no actual programming required (unlike Kenwood) Currently being proven in space flight on Stanford’s Quakesat mission Significantly cheaper than the Kenwood radios Cons Only UHF version available: so we would need a different radio for VHF (no longer advantageous) September 16, 2018

34 Design Decision Two Kenwood TH-D7 radios: one for uplink, the other for downlink. Reasons Only choice that allows two distinct channels for uplink and downlink, respectively. Much better to use same model for both channels 9.6 kbps should be a sufficient baud rate for the purposes of this mission No idea when the ICOM 1.2 GHz radio will ever be available for our use. September 16, 2018

35 Antenna Trade Study Monopole Pros Cons Simple design
Does not take up space on the satellite’s surface Cons Deployable Could be very long (~50 cm) September 16, 2018

36 Antenna Trade Study Patch Pros Cons Preferable gain pattern
Non-deployable Cons Could occupy a lot of space on nadir surface More complicated design process More expensive September 16, 2018

37 Power DINO Peer Review

38 Side Panel and Aero Fins
ADCS COMM Science Structures 12 Volt Line 5 Volt Line 28 Volt Line EPS System C&DH Inhibits Side Panel and Aero Fins FITS Solar Array Batteries September 16, 2018

39 EPS System Voltage Bus Switches Sensors Batteries Charge Controller
Microprocessor C&DH September 16, 2018

40 The Ball Systems vs. CU System
The drop dead decision date is tomorrow Ball: Complicated, Clean, Expensive CU: Simple, Cheap, Not as good Ball will advise regardless September 16, 2018

41 Power Distribution and Monitoring
Must distribute and regulate power to all subsystems +24V (regulated) +15V (unregulated) +12V (regulated) +5V (regulated) Must be commandable by C&DH Communication will be through a RS-232 port The PWR team must provide a commands list to C&DH and Software September 16, 2018

42 Power Distribution and Monitoring
4 internal temperature monitors for each battery cell Voltage Monitoring Battery Stack Voltage All major voltage buses Each solar panel The current draws from each subsystem must be monitored September 16, 2018

43 Power Distribution and Monitoring
The temperature should nominal be 20ºC and can fluctuate ±20ºC. The latest sample from the monitoring must be able to be stored in memory. All subsystems must be able to turn on/off. September 16, 2018

44 Structural Concerns The power system shall weight less than 2.25 kg
The system will use only required components The system will use the lightest components possible The power system shall be structurally supported The batteries will be in a contained box with potting material The EPS will be in box mounted to a side panel of the satellite The structure ground will be separate from the electrical ground The structure will have less than an 1 ohms resistance The boxes of the structure will be anodize to prevent electrical shorts September 16, 2018

45 Power Safety Meeting all safety concerns
Following NASA’s guidelines for safety The proper connections will be made between systems The system will be properly grounded and tested Inhibits will be used to ensure systems are NOT powered 4 inhibits will be used to separate the power sources switches will be used to turn on and off devices Ball Aerospace will assist us in testing Selection of batteries will be supervised Charge control system will be test with Ball Engineers September 16, 2018

46 Relays Switch Pros Pros Manages large amounts of power.
Used on previous mission. Resets to a open state. Simple circuit design Widely available costing about $2-5 Cons Has a bulky size, about 2-3 cm tall. Will require a driver to trigger. Slow reaction time, the time is based how fast the coils will charge. A switch can do most of the same functions Pros Simple setup, Is either on or off. Low power usage, using less than a Mw. Controlled by high and low signals. The cost of switches will between $1-3. Cons There is no fail safe. May not be able to handle the power going through it. September 16, 2018

47 Lithium Batteries 4 Cell Stack ~3.7V/Cell, 14.8V Stack
At least 4 A-hr capacity Cells must be structurally contained Cells from Valence Tech.

48 Why Lithium-Polymer? High capacity, small physical size and weight make an unbeatable combination No liquid electrolyte reduces risk of fire/short Support from Ball Aerospace 3.7 V/Cell Nickel-based cells are too heavy and lack enough capacity September 16, 2018

49 What’s the catch? Cell stack will need careful charging to make it last for entire mission Charge controllers will need to have different, optimal charge profiles Each cell in the stack will need temperature monitoring and shunt diodes Cells have no integral structure and must be completely supported No Space Shuttle flight heritage Battery system must be two-fault tolerant September 16, 2018

50 Science Jessica Pipis

51 September 16, 2018

52 Power Needs For Camera’s
A 5 Volt line going to each camera is needed. To start up,each camera will require 190mA. When idle, each camera will require 178mA. While taking a picture, each camera will require 186mA. An interface board will require power to switch between camera’s. September 16, 2018

53 Data Each picture is about 200k at maximum resolution (1248x960).
Takes about seconds for images to store. Takes a couple minutes to pull pictures off of the camera’s. May take more or less time depending on software. September 16, 2018

54 Durability of Camera’s
All components (except for lens) look to be secured to circuit board. The circuit board will need to be conformal coated. Housing for lens is only concern. Not secured to circuit board. A box can be built to secure it. Unknown plastic used for casing We may find way to get plastic analyzed. We may find a replacement casing. September 16, 2018

55 Software Subsystem

56 Overview Ground software Flight software
Uplink commands/schedule to spacecraft Downlink H&S/science data from spacecraft Flight software Perform commands from ground Gather H&S and process science data Update schedule based on opportunities or problems September 16, 2018

57 Ground S/W - Uplink Web browser MySQL SCL COMM STK Disk/ Files
Immediate Cmds Scheduled Cmds Web browser MySQL Cmds Pkts SCL COMM Events STK Schedules = H/W Interface Schedules Disk/ Files September 16, 2018

58 Ground S/W - Downlink Web browser MySQL SCL COMM STK Disk/ Files
Sci data H&S (All) Sensor data Web browser MySQL Pkts Orbit data SCL COMM STK H&S (ADCS) Pictures = H/W Interface Disk/ Files Sci data (pictures) September 16, 2018

59 Ground S/W – H/W Interfaces
Radio to Communications module (COMM) Could be different for each ground station CU’s radio requires serial RS-232 connection Software will handle serial RS-232 and have the ability to add others as needed TNC to Communications module (COMM) CU’s TNC requires serial RS-232 connection September 16, 2018

60 Ground S/W – S/W Interfaces
Web to MySQL Perl Inputs and outputs: TBD Web to STK Perl or C++ Web to SCL September 16, 2018

61 Ground S/W – S/W Interfaces
COMM to SCL C++ Inputs and outputs: TBD COMM to STK COMM to MySQL September 16, 2018

62 Ground S/W – S/W Interfaces
STK to MySQL Perl Inputs and outputs: TBD September 16, 2018

63 Ground S/W – Human Interfaces
Website to issue commands MOPS interface Distributed Investigator interface General Public interface Website to see H&S and Sci data September 16, 2018

64 Ground S/W – Human Interfaces
STK to visualize current and expected orbit characteristics – MOPS interface only SCL to visualize data/cmds flowing to and from spacecraft – MOPS interface only September 16, 2018

65 Flight S/W – Process_Cmd
ADCS ? I2C_mgr ? BPGEN ? COMM SCI serialmgr Route_cmd ? SWM usbmgr POWER ? = H/W Interface SCL DB SCL September 16, 2018

66 Flight S/W – Process_Reply
ADCS ? I2C_mgr ? BPGEN ? COMM Return_reply SCI serialmgr ? SWM usbmgr POWER ? = H/W Interface SCL DB SCL September 16, 2018

67 Flight S/W – H/W Interfaces
Radio to Communications module (COMM) Either serial or USB TNC to Communications module (COMM) Software to Serial (exists) Software to I2C (exists) Software to USB (yet to be developed) September 16, 2018

68 Flight S/W – S/W Interfaces
ProcessTask functions to ProcessTask objects C++ Inputs and outputs: exists SCL to ProcessTask objects ProcessTask objects to IO managers Inputs and outputs: serial and I2C exist, USB TBD September 16, 2018

69 Flight S/W – S/W Interfaces
ProcessTask objects to SCL DB C++ Inputs and outputs: exists ProcessTask objects to COMM September 16, 2018

70 Other S/W Tasks Besides the existing ProcessTasks talking to hardware, DINO Software needs to: Convert stereo images to topo maps Reschedule failed events within SCL Schedule new images when unexpected opportunities arise (i.e. new clouds are seen) No new interfaces needed but this is all new software code that needs to be written and tested.7 September 16, 2018

71 Trade Studies Linux vs. VxWorks Linux has bigger kernel
Linux = about 3 mb +/- 1 mb VxWorks = about 1 mb +/- 0.5 mb Flight software needs to be ported All kernel calls changed = 2-3 week task Memory management (i.e. shared memory) = 3 -4 week task Flight code compiled into own libraries Starting flight code would change September 16, 2018

72 Trade Studies Linux vs. VxWorks (cont) Cross compiling needed for PPC
Need to compile kernel on a machine like Thinker or another Linux computer Much bigger knowledge base for Linux New students to Space Grant can help development much quicker than learning VxWorks Questions can be posted on discussion groups and more likely to be answered September 16, 2018

73 Trade Studies Linux vs. VxWorks (cont)
Our recommendation: Linux (mostly for the student’s ability to start work with it) VxWorks will be contingency OS if Linux development/porting takes too long (time TBD) Still need to decide on which distribution of Linux: Commercial: MontaVista, RedHat, TimeSys Free: Debian, muLinux, ThinLinux, etc. September 16, 2018

74 Structures and Mechanisms - Peer Design Review -
Jen Getz Anthony Lowrey Grayson McArthur Tim Shilling Terry Song 9/16/2018

75 - Table Of Contents - Structure Deployable Block Diagram
Needed from other Teams September 16, 2018

76 Structure Revision C Dimensions: 18.15in x Ø17.75in Mass: 5.78 kg
Material: Aluminum 6061 * All dimensions are in inches * September 16, 2018

77 Mounting Holes Revision C Side Top * All dimensions are in inches *
September 16, 2018

78 Clearance Revision C Side Bottom Top * All dimensions are in inches *
September 16, 2018

79 Boxes Tall Components Short Components Benefits
* Less wasted material = Lower Cost * Internal components more accessible * Mounting is more flexible September 16, 2018

80 Boom Deployment Open Loop System (Push tip mass away with springs and let the system deploy on its own) Mini-Lightband release ring or Hop Release September 16, 2018

81 Hight Output Paraffin Actuator (H.O.P)
Pin Puller Less then 120g Small, only about 3 inches tall and ¾ inch diameter 50 lbs of force Activated with 28V at 18 watts, which heats up the wax inside the piston, expanding it and causing the pin puller to move September 16, 2018

82 FITs solar Array Deployment
Thin Film Solar Arrays FITs solar Array Deployment September 16, 2018

83 One H.O.P = Multiple Deployments
September 16, 2018

84 FITs and Aerofins Release Mechanism
Spring Pushes Latch H.O.P Released Pin Released September 16, 2018

85 Aerofins and FITS solar Arrays
Input and Control Aerofins and FITs Solar Arrays H.O.P 18 28V for 1.5 minutes Composite Hinges 10 28V per Hinge for 1 minute 2-4 Hinges required High/Low output (Switch signaling final deployed position) released position) September 16, 2018

86 Boom Input and Control OR H.O.P 18 watts @ 28V for 1.5 minutes
Lightband Separator 10 12V for 1 minute High/Low output (Switch successful separation and final deployed position) OR September 16, 2018

87 (Switch signaling final
Antenna Input and Control Solenoid 5watts at 12 V High/Low output (Switch signaling final deployed position) September 16, 2018

88 Summarized Structure’s Needs
7-9 hi/low output lines, signaling various stages of deployment 2 Solenoids, 5watts at 12V (May not be needed) 1 or 2 H.O.Ps, 18 28V for 1.5 minutes 1 possible Lightband Separator, 10 12V for 1 minute 4 total, 2 at a time deployment Composite Hinges, 10 28V per Hinge for 1 minute September 16, 2018

89 Thermal Subsystem Peer Review 7-9-3

90 Objective: To maintain all components of the space craft within their specific temperature range

91 Model Empty Spacecraft for entire orbit:
Method Model Empty Spacecraft for entire orbit: Assumptions: ISS Orbit Thermal Properties Structure Results: Heat gain from Radiation Heat reflected within satellite

92 Inside-the-Box Modeling
Thermistors Used to monitor temperatures at specific locations during orbit. This will allow for us to troubleshoot during the mission when components are not acting properly. Sensor is glued to surface of interest, where it creates a specific resistance in response to temperature measurement. Approximately, 50 thermistors will be required at $3-$6 each.

93 Inside-the-Box Modeling
Temperature Control Isolation Some sensitive electrical components will need to be isolated from the radiative/conductive environment. We can do this thru MLI blankets. Heat Reservoirs Components which are exposed to alternating hot and cold modes, will need to be in contact with heat reservoirs which will both gather and supply heat when needed.

94 Inside-the-Box Modeling
Heat Expulsion Radiator: The radiator rejects excess heat into space. Placement: The best position for the radiator is the earth facing side of the satellite. This should not affect the cameras, and is standard practice.

95 What’s Next? Thermal Model
Upon reporting specifications of materials and equipment, as well as their modes of operation, our model can be expanded to increase accuracy. Placement of Thermistors will result from the reporting of these specifications, so we can identify points of interest for temperature measurement.

96 References http://www.angels-crossing.com/gifts.html
gore.ocean.washington.edu/.../ Students/Crone/therm.htm index.shtml

97 Systems Peer Review

98 Satellite Communications
Serial Ethernet Analog Data Digital Data USB RF Cam 1 Cam 2 September 16, 2018

99 Satellite Power Cam 1 Cam 2 Imaging Thermal HOP SW FIN SW 1 15 V 5 V
September 16, 2018

100 Satellite Mass Budget Allocation (%) Goal (Budget) Current (kg)
Allocation (%) Goal (Budget) Current (kg) Subsystems ADCS 14 2.63 0.12 C&DH 3 0.56 0.15 Comm 5 0.94 0.70 Power 1.44 Science 8 1.50 0.07 Software 0.00 Str/Mech 49 9.19 6.94 Thermal 2 0.38 Cabling Total 18.75 Margin 6.25 100% 25.00 9.42 September 16, 2018

101 Tip Payload Mass Budget
Allocation (%) Goal (Budget) Current (kg) Subsystems ADCS 0.00 C&DH Comm 10 0.38 Power 20 0.75 0.31 Science 13 0.49 Software Str/Mech 52 1.95 Thermal 2 0.08 Cabling 3 0.11 Total 3.75 Margin 1.25 100% 5.00 September 16, 2018

102 Daytime Power Budget Goal (Budget) Power Allocation (%) Goal (Budget)
Goal (Budget) Power Allocation (%) Goal (Budget) Current Mission Power Power (W) Duration (min) Budget (W-hr) Available 30.0 55 27.50 Subsystems ADCS 4.0 3.67 16.7 3.7 0.3 C&DH 3.6 Comm Rx 1.0 0.92 4.2 0.9 6.7 Comm Tx 19.0 5 1.58 7.2 1.6 0.1 Power -2.6 Science 11.0 50 9.17 41.7 9.2 1.1 Software 0.0 0.00 Str/Mech Thermal 2.3 2.09 9.5 2.1 Total 22.0 Margin 5.5 100.0% 27.5 September 16, 2018

103 Nighttime Power Budget
Goal (Budget) Power Allocation (%) Goal (Budget) Current Mission Power Power (W) Duration (min) Budget (W-hr) Available 30.0 35 17.50 Subsystems ADCS 4.0 20 1.33 9.5 1.3 0.3 C&DH 2.33 16.7 2.3 Comm Rx 1.0 0.58 4.2 0.6 10.0 Comm Tx 19.0 3 0.95 6.8 0.0 Power 13.6 Science 0.00 Software Str/Mech Thermal 2.0 1.17 8.3 1.2 Total 14.0 Margin 3.5 49.6% 17.5 26.2 September 16, 2018

104 Configuration Management
Document Naming DINO-SUBSYS-TYPE-NAME, Rev. 1 SUBSYS: A two to four letter description of the subsystem involved. TYPE: A two to four letter description of the type of document. NAME: A six letter abbreviation of the document title. September 16, 2018

105 Subsystems Management MNG Systems SYS Software SW Structures STR
Mission Operations MOPS Communications COMM Thermal THR Attitude Determination/ Control ADCS Command and Data Handling CDH Power PWR Mechanisms MECH Imaging IMG September 16, 2018

106 Procedures/Instructions
Document Type Requirements RQT Part Lists PL Material Lists ML Report RPT Plan PLN Procedures/Instructions PROC Manual MAN Policy POL Drawing DRW Part PRT Assembly (not a plan) ASM September 16, 2018

107 Actions and Summary Action Items from review Requirements updating
Requirements Review on 7/23/03 SHOT Workshop Thursday at 2:00 Power and Inhibits Friday at 8:15 NanoSat PDR Overview Logo Contest July 17, 2003 at the huddle September 16, 2018


Download ppt "Peer Review DINO July 9, 2003."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google