Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Workpackage “Noise Modelling”

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Workpackage “Noise Modelling”"— Presentation transcript:

1 Workpackage “Noise Modelling”
Sound Propagation - new propagation models Dietrich Heimann (translated and presented by U. Isermann) DLR - Institute of Atmospheric Physics (IPA) Oberpfaffenhofen

2 Workpackage “Noise Modelling”
emission perception transmission immission

3 Workpackage “Noise Modelling / Propagation”
1. Propagation effects 2. Propagation models 3. The IPA approach

4 Propagation effects inhomogenous, turbulent atmosphere absorption
reflection refraction scattering diffraction topography, buildings, obstacles

5   Propagation effects altitude lateral distance from baseline shadow
for a temperature decrease temperature increase with altitude with altitude or for  wind  upward refraction downward refraction shadow single reflection multiple reflection lateral distance from baseline

6 Propagation effects shadow zone due to refraction
source contibutions from direct and reflected sound contributions from diffraction scatterering shadow zone due to refraction shadow zone due to topography source contributions from direct and reflected sound contributions from diffraction scattering

7 Magnitude of propagation effects:
Spherical wave attenuation:  Lmax - 6 dB per doubling of distance Additional effects: Atmospheric absorption:  - 1 dB je 100 m (1000 Hz)  - 5 dB je 100 m (4000 Hz) Ground effects:  - 10 dB for grazing incidence Refraction:  - 25 dB for upward refraction  + 6 dB for downward refraction Scattering, diffraction  -25 dB attenuation limit in shadow zones

8 Workpackage “Noise Modelling / Propagation”
1. Propagation effects 2. Propagation models 3. The IPA approach

9 Sound propagation models
1. Standard models (z.B. ISO 9613, AIR 1845, Doc.29) Geometric term + different correction factors Atmospheric effects not accounted for (or only by simplifying approaches) 2. Numerical models (e.g. Euler model) The more effects, the more accurate the model- but with increasing modelling and calculation efforts!

10 Sound propagation models
Euler model: Example: barrier of trees  wind field  sound propagation

11 Sound propagation models
Euler model: Airport environment as a field of application ?

12 Sound propagation models
Euler model: Applied for direct airport environment (1051) km3 and a frequency of 1000 Hz: Mesh-width of calculation grid: 3,4 cm Number of meshs: 1,2  1015 Numerical time step needed: 100 s Number of time steps: 300,000 Calculation time (NEC SX4) per mesh and step: 1 s

13 Sound propagation models
Euler model: Applied for direct airport environment (1051) km3 and a frequency of 1000 Hz: Mesh-width of calculation grid: 3,4 cm Number of meshs: 1,2  = 144 PByte Numerical time step needed: 100 s Number of time steps: 300,000 Calculation time (NEC SX4) per mesh and step: 1 s Total calculation time: 360 Ts = 11 million years

14 Sound propagation models
Calculation time: 2030: 24 h ????? 2036: 15 min ???? Present: Process studies Future: Standard procedure ?

15 Workpackage “Noise Modelling / Propagation”
1. Propagation effects 2. Propagation models 3. The IPA approach

16 The IPA approach Goal: Numerical models ... ... develop them
... use them as a reference Derive simplified models to - increase the accuracy of standard procedures - but maintain their practicability and usability

17 The Lagrange model (sound particles)
The IPA approach The Lagrange model (sound particles) Hz up to 5000 m propagation distance source altitude: m wind at 1600 m: m/s ground wind wind at 1600 m

18 The IPA approach Realisation: Advantage:
Use the principle of the standard approach: Calculate the excess attenuation LMB due to meteorological and ground effects using the Lagrange model. Store the values of LMB for a set of different propagation situations in attenuation lookup tables. Advantage: Only moderate increases in computation time are needed. This approach can also be used for standard models.

19 Independent parameters:
The IPA approach Independent parameters: 7 classes of source altitude 8 classes of ground receiver distance 6 classes of wind speed (10 m above ground) 12 classes of angle between wind direction and direction of propagation 3 atmospheric stability classes 8 frequency classes (octave bands)  64,512 possible combinations ….

20 The IPA approach Example 1: source: 1600 m, wind: 10 m/s, atmosphere: neutral quieter -18 dB 0 dB +9 dB louder

21 The IPA approach Example 2: source: 50 m, no wind, atmosphere: unstable quieter -18 dB 0 dB +9 dB louder

22 The IPA approach Example 3: source: 100 m, wind: 2 m/s, inversion
quieter -18 dB 0 dB +9 dB louder

23 Workpackage “Noise Modelling / Propagation”
Summary:  Progress in the development of complex sound propagation models  Derivation of a simplified model  Definition of pre-calculated tables for meteorology- and ground-excess attenuation which can also be used for standard models

24 Workpackage “Noise Modelling / Propagation”
Validation ... ... based on 1 year noise monitoring at Munich airport (2003)  6 aircraft types, monitored noise values (FMG)  radar information on aircraft position (DFS)  meteorological information (DWD, Uni München, FMG) noise meteo


Download ppt "Workpackage “Noise Modelling”"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google