Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor"— Presentation transcript:

1 Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor
September 2004 IEEE Wireless Interworking with External Networks (WIEN) Study Group Berlin 13 September 2004 Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor

2 13 September 2004, 8am – 10am Call to Order
Month 2002 doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 September 2004 13 September 2004, 8am – 10am Call to Order Sign in sheet & attendance Secretary Review IEEE 802 and Policies and Procedures Intellectual Property Voting All Registered Meeting Attendees May Vote All Main Motions require 75% Attendance Study Group Attendance List On-line Attendance reminder Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor John Doe, His Company

3 IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws on Patents in Standards
Month 2002 doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 September 2004 IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws on Patents in Standards IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard. This assurance shall be provided without coercion and prior to approval of the standard (or reaffirmation when a patent becomes known after initial approval of the standard). This assurance shall be a letter that is in the form of either a) A general disclaimer to the effect that the patentee will not enforce any of its present or future patent(s) whose use would be required to implement the proposed IEEE standard against any person or entity using the patent(s) to comply with the standard or b) A statement that a license will be made available without compensation or under reasonable rates, with reasonable terms and conditions that are demonstrably free of any unfair discrimination This assurance shall apply, at a minimum, from the date of the standard's approval to the date of the standard's withdrawal and is irrevocable during that period. Approved by IEEE-SA Standards Board – December 2002 Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor John Doe, His Company

4 Inappropriate Topics for IEEE WG Meetings
Month 2002 doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 September 2004 Inappropriate Topics for IEEE WG Meetings Don’t discuss licensing terms or conditions Don’t discuss product pricing, territorial restrictions or market share Don’t discuss ongoing litigation or threatened litigation Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed… do formally object. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at Approved by IEEE-SA Standards Board – December 2002 Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor John Doe, His Company

5 Study Groups Function Formation
September 2004 Study Groups Function The function of a Study Group (SG) is to complete a defined task with specific output and in a specific time frame. Once this task is complete, the function of the SG is complete and its charter expires. The normal function of a SG is to draft a complete PAR and five criteria (see subclause 9.2) and to gain approval for them at WG , 802 EC, IEEE New Standards Committee (NesCom) and the IEEE Standards Board. The decision of whether to utilize the WG or to establish a new WG or TAG to carry out work items recommended by a SG is made by the 802 EC with advice from the WG. Formation A SG is formed when sufficient interest has been identified for a particular area of study within the scope of WG The first step in the process is a call for interest. Any WG member or observer can make this at the WG opening plenary. An SG can then be initiated by 75% approval of the WG and must be approved by the 802 EC. During this approval process the 802 EC decides whether a SG is within the scope of WG , should be moved to another WG or should be set up as an Executive Committee Study Group. Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor

6 Continuation Study Group Operation
September 2004 Continuation A SG exists for up to 6 months. If it has not completed its work within that time, a request must be made to the WG for an extension for up to additional 6 months. Any request for SG extension will be voted upon at the WG closing plenary. Study Group Operation SG follow the operating procedures for TG specified above with the following exceptions detailed below: Study Group Meetings SG meetings held adjunct to WG Plenary or Interim sessions count towards WG voting rights Voting at Study Group Meetings Any person attending a SG meeting may participate in SG discussions, make motions and vote on all motions (including recommending approval of a PAR and five criteria). Attendance List Since SGs may have members who are not part of the parent WG, a separate attendance list must be maintained for the meetings of the SG and will be submitted as a document to the WG Vice-Chair. Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor

7 September 2004 Meeting Etiquette "Individuals are to address the comments of others only, not the person" Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor

8 Agenda Monday September 13 16:00 – 21:30 IEEE Policies and Procedures
Overview of last meeting (incl. open issues review) Minutes and notes about August 11 audio conference (896) PAR (506r6) and 5 Criteria (507r1) overview Incoming liaisons Outgoing liaisons Liaisons to 3GPP/3GPP2 Technical Presentations I Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor

9 Agenda Tuesday September 14 08:00 – 12:30 Technical Presentations II
PAR (506r6) & 5 Criteria (507r1) completion Roadmap discussion for SG/TG (712r1) Introduction to Wednesday’s IETF review Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor

10 Wednesday September 15 13:30 – 18:00
Agenda Wednesday September :30 – 18:00 IETF Draft Overview (1020) Draft document and motion Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor

11 Objective of this session
September 2004 Objective of this session Technical submissions to refine scope and way forward Complete PAR and 5 Criteria documents Produce roadmap for Study Group/Task Group Address open issues list Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor

12 Air Interface Issues AR identifier MAC address anonymity
Month 2002 doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 September 2004 Air Interface Issues AR identifier Supports layer 3 mobility. IP address change or not MAC address anonymity Protecting terminal identity Network Detection and Selection Beacon scalability What information can you transmit and how frequently. Higher data rates do not help! Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor John Doe, His Company

13 Air Interface Issues II
Month 2002 doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 September 2004 Air Interface Issues II Universal Access Method/11i co-existence User registration Channel management User clear down Graceful removal of user session Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor John Doe, His Company

14 Network – Network Issues
Month 2002 doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 September 2004 Network – Network Issues Policy enforcement Access control Simultaneous access External QoS mapping User access revocation Admission control Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor John Doe, His Company

15 Month 2002 doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 September 2004 IETF Review Documents 1) “EAP Network Discovery and Selection Problem Description Document”  2) “Identity selection hints for Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor John Doe, His Company

16 Month 2002 doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 September 2004 Motion Move to accept the IEEE WIEN SG PAR (506r8) and 5 Criteria (507r2) and to forward these documents to the IEEE WG Result : Approved Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor John Doe, His Company


Download ppt "Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google