Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Introduction 3. Instrumentation 2. Objectives 4. Results

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Introduction 3. Instrumentation 2. Objectives 4. Results"— Presentation transcript:

1 Introduction 3. Instrumentation 2. Objectives 4. Results
Mercury is an environmental pollutant of global concern. It occurs in nature in different forms, divided into inorganic mercury and organic mercury. All species have severe toxic effects on biota, but the toxicity and physiological metabolism differs, with organic mercury known as the most toxic mercury compound. The main mercury species in nature are Hg0, Hg2+ and MeHg, and this work focuses on the speciation of MeHg and Hg2+. Figure 1 shows the central part of the global mercury cycle. The aim of this research was the development of an online pre-concentration system for speciation with HPLC-CV-AFS. The Limit of detection for most analysis methods is in the high ng L-1 range which is simply not sensitive good enough for most environmental samples especially water. We developed therefore a preconcen-tration set-up prior to the separation-detection unit: MeHg and Hg2+ is trapped on thiol and thiourea bound to silica (see Fig. 2) from the sample and subsequently eluted with the mobile phase into the HPLC-CV-AFS. Fig. 3 Oxidant 0.01 M Br-/BrO3- in 1.2 M HCl 3 ml/min Reductant 2 % SnCl2 in 1.2 M HCl 5 ml/min Mobile phase 1.5 mM Ammonium pyrrolidine dithiocarb-amate in 78 % methanol 1 mL/min Table 2 The main part of the system is a Millennium Merlin System coupled to a UV cracker and a cooling module (PSA S570U100 & S570C100). Two basic HPLC pumps are used (one pumps the sample!) Sample is loaded (in principle any volume) onto a preconcentration column The valve is switched after the preconcentration The mobile phase elutes the mercury species from the pre-conc. column onto the main separation column Fig. 2 Preconcen -tration material Fig. 1 Mercury enters the atmosphere as Hg0, is oxidized and enters the aquatic environment as Hg2+, is methylated by microorganisms into the more toxic MeHg which accumulates throughout the aquatic food web and affects in the end us as human beings. 4. The solvent stream is mixed with an oxidant stream to oxidise MeHg+ to Hg2+; UV supports the oxidation The solvent stream is mixed with reductant to produce Hg0 Argon gas carries Hg0 as a vapour into the AFS detec-tion chamber 4. Results 4.1 Performance The parameters defining the pre- concentration were analysed first. Crucial points are: (a) pH of the sample (b) Flow-rate of sample for preconc. Fig. 5 Analysis of sediment ERM®-CC580 after 2 different extraction procedures The flow-rate of the sample for the preconcentration in the range of 2 to 10 mL min-1 has no influence on the analysis. No break-through of mercury was observed. 4.5 Comparison with other methods We analysed various pilot-whale tissues (liver, muscle, kidney) with SS-ID-ICP-MS and this method and Figure 6 shows the correlation between the results. A slope of could be obtained which makes this method a reliable method for speciation. 4.4 Water, fish, lobster, hair and sediment samples Various samples with different and challenging sample matrices were analysed and the results are presented in table 2. The samples range from spiked samples to Certified reference materials. Overall, the recovery is in the range of 91.6 – %. Only sediment ERM®-CC580 showed a lower recovery with 87.5 %., however here a a selective extraction of the MeHg was used. In this sediment, the MeHg:Hg2+ ratio is 1:1786. A huge Hg2+ peak occurred next to the MeHg peak (see figure 5) but a selective extraction for MeHg reduced the peak to 0.28 ± 0.22 % of the original Hg2+ concentration. Fig. 4 Fig 4 shows the pH dependency of a 100 ng L-1 MeHg solution (10 mL preconcentrated). There is a broad stability from a pH of 1 to 6 with an intensity increase for pH 0, a decrease towards pH 7 and no possibility for separation after pH 7. Samples need no exact buffering, a rough acidifcation with HCl brings the sample into the suitable pH range. 4.2 Figures of merit Fig. 6 The method has a broad linear range from pg L-1 range to at least 1 µg L-1. An LOD of 0.04 ng L-1 for MeHg can be achieved when 200 mL sample are pre-concentrated. The linearity for a MeHg calibration is defined by an R2 of Samples Certified or spiked concentration for MeHg Measured concentration Recovery for MeHg as Hg (%) Water samples Sea water 10.0 ng L-1 9.91 ± 5.5 ng L-1 99.1 ± 5.5 % River water 9.70 ± ng L-1 97.0 ± 2.6 % Crude seawage 9.25 ± 0.14 ng L-1 92.5 ± 1.4 % Spiked Urine 50.0 ng L-1 49.9 ± 2.4 ng L-1 99.9 ± 4.8 % Estuarine sediment ERM®-CC580 75.5 ± 3.7 µg kg-1 77.8 ± 5.7 µg kg-1 103.7 ± 7.6 % 65.6 ± 4.7 µg kg-1* 87.5 ± 6.3 %* Fish and lobster CRM NRCC-TORT-2 152 ± 13 µg kg-1 154.6 ± 5.8 µg kg-1 102 ± 3.8 % NRCC-DOLT-2 693 ± 53 µg kg-1 756 ± 39 µg kg-1 109.1 ± 5.7 % NRCC-DOLT-4 1.33 ± 0.12 mg kg-1 1.21 ± mg kg-1 91.6 ± 3.3 % NRCC-DORM-3 355 ± 56 µg kg-1 362 ± 9 µg kg-1 101.9 ± 2.6 % Hair NIES No.13 3.8 ± 0.4 mg kg-1 3.91 ± 0.22 mg kg-1 ± 5.8 % IAEA-085 21.9 ± 2.0 mg kg-1 21.92 ± 1.09 mg kg-1 100.1 ± 5.0 % 5. Conclusion Our method is an easy and cost effective speciation approach for MeHg based on the preconcentration of the mercury species on thiol/thiourea material and the subsequent analysis with HPLC-CV-AFS. The method works with good recoveries for a broad variety of samples and even challenging sample matrices have no effect on the preconcentration or the analysis. 4.3 Sample preparation Water samples are filtered, acidified with HCl (final concentration of 0.37 % (v/v)). Sediments were acid leached with 18.5 % (v/v) HCl for 30 min under ultrasound. A 1:50 dilution was done for analysis. A selective extraction for MeHg was performed based on the extraction of MeHg into dichloromethane from the acid leachate, and a back-extraction into water by evaporating the dichloromethane with a stream of air. The biological samples were digested in alkaline medium in the microwave, ultracentrifuged, acidified, diluted and analysed. 6. Acknowledgement This PhD was funded by PS Analytical and the University of Aberdeen. A big thank-you therefore to Dr. Warren T. Corns and Dr. Bin Chen, and to Dr. Eva Krupp and Prof. Jörg Feldmann. Table 2 * Selective extraction for MeHg with dichloromethane


Download ppt "Introduction 3. Instrumentation 2. Objectives 4. Results"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google