Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Discovery set: 10 RRMS (2) vs 9 SPMS (3)

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Discovery set: 10 RRMS (2) vs 9 SPMS (3)"— Presentation transcript:

1 Discovery set: 10 RRMS (2) vs 9 SPMS (3) 7 MRI RRMS (2) vs 3 MRI SPMS (3)

2 15 MRI RRMS (2) vs 14 MRI SPMS (3)
Validation 50 RRMS vs 51 SPMS 15 MRI RRMS (2) vs 14 MRI SPMS (3)

3 15 MRI RRMS (2) vs 14 MRI SPMS (3)
Validation 50 RRMS vs 51 SPMS 15 MRI RRMS (2) vs 14 MRI SPMS (3)

4 15 MRI RRMS (2) vs 14 MRI SPMS (3)
Validation 50 RRMS vs 51 SPMS 15 MRI RRMS (2) vs 14 MRI SPMS (3)

5 RR(2) and SP(3) groups BPF T2 ICC

6 BPF vs ICC in Female(1) and Male(0)
ICC in RR(2) and SP(3) groups

7 RR(2) and SP(3) groups BPF Age T2 T2 vs Age BPF vs Age

8 RR(2) and SP(3) groups BPF vs Disease Duration T2 vs Disease Duration

9 BPF vs T2, natural clustering

10 BPF vs T2 Cutoff 3 Cutoff 2

11 BPF vs T2 Cutoff 4 BPF in T groups T2 in T groups

12 BPF vs T2 Cutoff 4 BPF in T groups T2 in T groups

13 BPF vs T2 in F(1) and M(0) RR (2) SP(3)

14 stepwise (A, GROUP) RR vs SP
A=[GENDER, AGE, ICC, T2, BPF, CSF, DD, DIS_ACT, T]

15 A=[GENDER, AGE, ICC, T2, BPF, CSF, DD, DIS_ACT, T]
in RR(2) SP(3)


Download ppt "Discovery set: 10 RRMS (2) vs 9 SPMS (3)"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google