Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

BaBar Experience with RPCs: A snapshot of our present knowledge

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "BaBar Experience with RPCs: A snapshot of our present knowledge"— Presentation transcript:

1 BaBar Experience with RPCs: A snapshot of our present knowledge
Henry Band University of Wisconsin

2 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin
Introduction The BaBar detector at the PEPII B factory has operated a ~2000 m RPC detector since 1999 These RPCs operating in the streamer regime have proven very sensitive to temperature Both RPC current and efficiency have suffered apparently irreversible changes (new results show hope of reversing changes) Examination of opened RPCs show clear problems with the linseed oil coating A few new RPCs with thinner oil coatings were installed in late 00 Although LHC RPCs operate in avalanche mode, our experience may be relevant to this next generation of RPC detector IFR RPCs History of IFR construction Initial efficiency measurements Operational problems Unstable temperature and currents Declining efficiency Detector studies BaBar Test stands Other RPC Autopsy photos Inefficiency Model New RPCs Characteristics Operation BaBar plans May 11, 2001 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin

3 Instrumented Flux Return
342 barrel RPCs 432 endcap RPCs 32 cylindrical RPCs Electronics 3300 Front end cards ~ 40 mV threshold 16 channels connected to alternate strips 1 TDC measurement 1 scalar Gas 35% Freon 134a, 4.5% iso-butane, 60.5% Argon 2-3 volume changes/day High Voltage > kV HV pods May 11, 2001 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin

4 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin
IFR Collaboration INFN Lab.-Frascati - F. Anulli, R. Baldini, A. Calcaterra, D. Falciai, G. Finocchiaro, P. Patteri, I. Peruzzi, M. Piccolo, Y. Xie, A. Zallo, R. de Sangro INFN-Bari - A. Palano INFN-Genova -S. Bagnasco, A. Buzzo, G. Crosetti, M. Lovetere, M. Macri, S. Passaggio, F. Pastore, M.G. Pia, E. Robutti, A. Santroni, S. Tosi INFN-Napoli -T. Cartaro, N. Cavallo, G. DeNardo,F. Fabozzi, C. Gatto, , L Lista, P. Paolucci, D. Piccolo, C. Sciacca LLNL - R. Bionta, V. Brigljevec, D. Lange, D. Wright U. of Wisconsin- H. Band, A. Eichenbaum,J. Johnson U. Oregon - J. Brau, R. Frey, E. Grauges-Pous, M. Iwasaki, N. Sinev, D. Strom Yale U - T. Moore, H. Neal INFN-Roma - F. Ferroni, S. Morganti, G. Piredda, INFN-Pisa - M. Carpinelli, F. Forti Consulting experts C. Lu -Princeton University, J. Va’vra -SLAC, M. Lazzari - Turin May 11, 2001 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin

5 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin
IFR Construction Endcap RPCs 0.9m  m Barrel RPCs 1.25m  m 3 chambers per layer 3 RPC modules / chamber 2RPC modules / chamber May 11, 2001 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin

6 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin
BABAR RPC Operates in limited streamer mode Parallel high resitivity plates (Bakelite   cm ) Graphite ~100 k/ According to the General Tecnica factory the RPCs were filled 3 times with a mixture of 70% linseed oil and 30% n-pentane. Air was then flushed through the RPC for several days. Strip pitch Barrel mm (), 38 mm (z) Endcap 26 mm(y), 38 mm (x) Changes from L3 RPCs Polycarbonate buttons with lip replaced G10 cylindrical button Single layer with strips on both sides No mechanical envelope Nonflammable gas - low iso-butane %, CBrF3 replaced by Freon 134a C2H2F4 Gas mixture in % May 11, 2001 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin

7 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin
Bakelite Surface Changguo Lu Linseed oil coating smoothes surface imperfections No oil New Babar RPCs BaBar original May 11, 2001 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin

8 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin
IFR History RPCs chosen for BaBar 1/95 Mature technology Good L3 experience RPC Production 7/96- 10/97 RPC QA tests - Frascati I < 18 A and efficiency > 95% Chamber assembly SLAC 12/ /97 Chamber tests at SLAC 5/97 – 12/97 Initial tests High Temperatures - 30 C High Currents ~100 A Efficiency > 95% Assembly/test area air conditioned 7/97 Chamber insertion 6/97 -12/97 Cabling and Fecs installed from 10/97 Complete Barrel and Forward E.C. 11/98 Barrel cosmic ray tests 12/98 Sharply increasing current observed when doors closed and LV on Backward E.C. completed 4 / 99 First beam May 99 99% of RPCs working 96% of Fecs working Heating from electronics & ambient hall raise steel T to 29-34 HV current limitations force reduction in # of RPCs < I >  A barrel ~70 Endcap Complete barrel cooling 10/99 Install Endcap cooling 1/00 - 4/00 <I> 60A barrel ~40 Endcap Average Efficiency remain ~85% May 11, 2001 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin

9 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin
RPC tests at Frascati, 1997 HV modules shipped to LNF. Longitudinal strips were applied. Modules packed into boxes Cosmic ray tests were made to characterize each module Gas Ar 45%, Freon 50%, isobutane 5% Hz A May 11, 2001 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin

10 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin
Efficiency - LNF Efficiency of barrel modules 11 10  May 11, 2001 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin

11 LNF data / Construction
Neither the measured current or singles rate was found to depend on bakelite resistivity Singles rate < 1kHz /m2 Current 3-20 A RPCs air shipped to SLAC HV modules assembled 2 or 3 to a chamber 2nd view strips applied SLAC cosmic rays tests Completed and tested chambers inserted into BABAR steel After erection of BABAR steel - installed DAQ cabling HV cabling Gas connections May 11, 2001 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin

12 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin
June 1999 By May 99 IFR cabling complete RPC efficiencies good But - warning signs Some RPCs with > 100 A were disconnected Limited HV current capability FECs inside steel produce 2.3 W of heat each Total power into barrel ~2.6 kW Poor heat transfer to outside With collision data Barrel heats up ~.4 C/day IR hall temperature climbs during summer  77%  91%  93% May 11, 2001 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin

13 HV currents & temperatures 99
RPC current vs. time Barrel temperatures vs. time +10%/ day @7800 V Barrel face +0.4 C / day FEC power turned off 1 meter inside @6000 V May 11, 2001 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin

14 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin
RPC Efficiency 99 Climbing temperatures forced the disconnection of more RPCs Cooling system being prototyped Average currents were 70 A(sextant 4) -210 A (sextant 0) 65 A Forward endcap 70 A Backward endcap Because of voltage drops across a ~1.5 M resistor in the HV distribution network, the voltage on working RPCs was reduced by volt Additional inefficiency from more conventional sources HV shorts 3% Gas leaks <2% Dead front end electronics <2% May 11, 2001 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin

15 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin
Water cooling Tests of prototype cooling loops in sextant 1 started in mid June Additional loops installed in August Full barrel installation of copper loops brazed into BABAR steel- Oct. 99 Completed endcap cooling system - Jan. 00 Remove ~ 10kW heat Stabilized temperature and RPC currents Barrel temps. ~19-21°, were ° in summer 99 Endcap temps ° May 11, 2001 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin

16 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin
Cooling / HV Currents 2000 May 11, 2001 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin

17 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin
RPC efficiency 00 Gas change -1.4% /month -0.56%/month -1.4% /month May 11, 2001 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin

18 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin
RPC efficiency 99-00 Barrel Forward E.C. Backward E.C.  91%  93% June 99  77%  81%  86%  85% Jan. 00  81%  75%  71% July 00 May 11, 2001 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin

19 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin
RPC efficiency 01 Efficiency loss is correlated with previous efficiency May 11, 2001 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin

20 Individual time histories
May 11, 2001 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin

21 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin
Detector studies Realization that the RPC efficiencies did not recover spurred detector studies During the data run access to the RPCs was limited Physical removal of any RPC would require > 1 month access Limited tests were carried out during accesses or on a few chambers Lowered barrel temp. to 17 C. Reversed HV Increased gas flow Lowered discriminator threshold Put weights over inefficient regions No effect Gas composition was regularly tested No evidence of water vapor A wide spread of plateau curves were measured. May 11, 2001 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin

22 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin
RPC radiography D. Piccolo The RPC efficiency was mapped in 2D showing irregular regions of reduced efficiency. May 11, 2001 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin

23 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin
RPC radiography (2) D. Piccolo May V 56% Ar May V 45% Ar May 11, 2001 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin

24 IFR efficiencies status
I. Peruzzi May 11, 2001 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin

25 IFR Construction Quality
I. Peruzzi Quality distribution vs production box Fraction of good chambers not uniformly distibuted in time Production problems? May 11, 2001 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin

26 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin
Test stands Test stands were restarted or started at several locations Frascati Napoli SLAC U. of Oregon SLAC test stand utilized 9 post BABAR production RPCs which had been used in background tests The RPCs were subjected to a heating cycle at 36 C. Permanent changes in both current and efficiency were seen Several RPCs were opened Large oil drops spanning the 2 mm gap were found. May 11, 2001 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin

27 SLAC/Wisconsin Test Stand
A. Soha SLAC/Wisconsin Test Stand A 32 C. 28 C 36 C. 29 C. May 11, 2001 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin

28 IFR inefficiency model
Linseed oil surface treatment under heat and HV has beaded up into drops. Some drops span the RPC gap making a high resistance short which reduces the local E field below that required for streamers. Bakelite Spacer Graphite FR4 frame Linseed oil drops Both HV current and efficiency are irreversibly changed The new shape of the buttons may be more likely to trap oil The number and location of the blobs explains both the RPC to RPC variation and the efficiency holes Gas leaks, HV shorts, and point discharges also contribute Test RPC May 11, 2001 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin

29 Oil Stalagmite Formation
Changguo Lu In lab tests using freshly painted bakelite (uncured) the application of 4-5 kV resulted in the movement of the oil and the formation of stalagmites within hours. In BaBar RPCs the oil is more viscous and the time scale is presumably much longer. May 11, 2001 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin

30 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin
Effect of Oil bridge Changguo Lu May 11, 2001 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin


Download ppt "BaBar Experience with RPCs: A snapshot of our present knowledge"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google