Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Olga Semenova1,2, Lyudmila Lebedeva3,4, Anatoly Zhirkevich5

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Olga Semenova1,2, Lyudmila Lebedeva3,4, Anatoly Zhirkevich5"— Presentation transcript:

1 Assessment of design flood characteristics for ungauged permafrost basin
Olga Semenova1,2, Lyudmila Lebedeva3,4, Anatoly Zhirkevich5 1Gidrotehproekt, 2St. Petersburg State University, 3Nansen Centre, 4 State Hydrological Institute, St.Petersburg 5 Hydroproject Institute, Moscow, Russia

2 Motivation Sparse hydrometric and meteorological network of Eastern Siberia Hydrologic regime affected by permafrost Changing climate conditions Practical needs of reliable assessment of design flood characteristics for present and future Goal Develop parameterization scheme for assessment of possible hydrologic changes in the Timpton River basin Make preliminary assessment of future runoff characteristics at the Kanku hydropower plant (under construction) by different approaches using the hydrological model Hydrograph Compare the results of three approaches: PMF (possible maximum flood), traditional frequency analysis and deterministic-stochastic modelling

3 Approaches Frequency analysis of observed runoff characteristics (annual mean, maximum, minimum). It is based on assumption of hydrological processes stationarity, long-term observational series and basin-analogues. Probable Maximum Flooding (PMF) method includes identification of crucial meteorological factors of maximum flooding and assessment of runoff characteristics according to them (in our case, by hydrological modelling) Deterministic-stochastic modelling – combined use of stochastic weather generator and deterministic hydrological modelling

4 Study object – the Timpton river basin
Gauge Distance from river mouth, km Basin area, km2 Period of runoff measurements 1 Ust’-Baralas 337 13 300 1954 – cont. 2 The Kanku hydropower plant 201 27 300 - 3 Ust’-Timpton 20 43 700 1952 – cont. Altitude varies from 600 to 1700 m Continental climate Bare rocks, tundra and larch forest Zone of discontinuous and sporadic permafrost

5 Variety of landscapes Bare rocks Bush tundra Larch forest
Deep active layer, Subsurface runoff Larch forest Shallow active layer, surface runoff Riparian vegetation

6 initially developed by Prof. Yury Vinogradov
The Hydrograph model Process-based (explicitly includes all processes) Observable parameters, minimum calibration (can be obtained apriori) Common input daily data (air temperature and moisture, precipitation) Free of scale problem (from soil column to large basin) initially developed by Prof. Yury Vinogradov

7 Basin schematization and model parameters
Basin area was divided into three landcover types: Bare rocks Tundra Larch forest Moss and lichen Peat Clay with inclusion of rocks Bedrock Density, kg/m3 500 1720 2610 Porosity, % 90 80 55 35 Water holding capacity, % 60 20-40 13 7 Infiltration coefficient, mm/min 10 0.0005 0.05-1 Heat capacity, J/(kg oC) 1930 840 750 Heat conductivity, W/(m oC) 0.8 1.2 1.5 Wilting point, % 8 6-8 4 2-3

8 Model validation on two adjacent basins
1. Ust’-Timpton (43700 km2), 1970 – 1973 observed simulated

9 Model validation on two adjacent basins
2. Ust’-Baralas (13300 km2), 1970 – 1973 observed simulated

10 Stochastic Weather Generator
Simulation of daily precipitation, temperature and relative humidity Simulation of annual and intra-seasonal variations Temporal correlation of meteorological elements Spatial correlation of meteorological elements Parameters are estimated from observed series of meteorological data Parameters may be modified according to climate change projections

11 Projected scenarios of air temperature (left) and precipitation (right) by changes 2100 (two models, two scenarios) Reference period – CanESM2 model NorESM1-M model

12 Probable Maximum Flooding approach
Main factors of maximum flooding: Snow water equivalent Rain on snow during snowmelt Intensity of air temperature increase during snowmelt Date of the temperature transition from positive to negative values in autumn antecedent year Precipitation of the last warm month of antecedent year The values of 1, 0.1, and 0.01% probability of chosen factors were used to generate artificial meteorological series Generated meteorological data were used as the forcing for the Hydrograph model to simulate probable maximum flood

13 Results – the Kanku hydropower gauge
PMF FA Frequency analysis Probable Maximum Flooding

14 Conclusions Three different approaches were used to access extreme flood characteristics for an ungauged basin in permafrost area. The results of three approaches are highly inconsistent. Probable Maximum Flooding approach relies on estimation of crucial meteorological factors values of low probability. Combination of the latter in a forecast results in significantly overestimated discharge. Conventional frequency analysis is based on the assumption of hydrological processes stationarity, which is undermined by the ongoing environmental change in high latitudes. DS-modelling approach is seen as a preferable tool for the assessment of flood characteristics in ungauged basins. It allows explicitly accounting for the factors causing extreme runoff events.

15 Thank you for attention!


Download ppt "Olga Semenova1,2, Lyudmila Lebedeva3,4, Anatoly Zhirkevich5"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google