Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

A Randomized Multicenter Comparison of Radiofrequency Ablation and Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy as First Line Treatment in 294 Patients with Paroxysmal.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "A Randomized Multicenter Comparison of Radiofrequency Ablation and Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy as First Line Treatment in 294 Patients with Paroxysmal."— Presentation transcript:

1 A Randomized Multicenter Comparison of Radiofrequency Ablation and Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy as First Line Treatment in 294 Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Jens Cosedis Nielsen, Professor, MD, DMSc, Aarhus, Denmark on behalf of the MANTRA-PAF investigators 1

2 MANTRA-PAF Investigators
Arne Johannessen Gentofte University Hospital, CPH, Denmark Pekka Raatikainen Oulu University Hospital, Finland Gerhard Hindricks Leipzig University Hospital, Germany Håkan Walfridsson University Hospital Linköping, Sweden Ole Kongstad Lund University Hospital, Sweden Steen Pehrson Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark Anders Englund University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden Juha Hartikainen Kuipio University Hospital, Finland Leif Spange Mortensen UNI-C, Denmark (Datamanagement and statistics) Peter Steen Hansen Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark (Chair, investigator committee) Jens Cosedis Nielsen Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark (Coordinating investigator) Funding: The trial was supported by unrestricted grants from the Danish Heart Foundation and from Biosense Webster and Johnson&Johnson 2

3 Aim To compare radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with antiarrhythmic drug therapy (AAD) as first-line treatment in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). 3

4 Methods Randomized controlled multicenter trial
Antiarrhythmic drug therapy (Class IC or III) (AAD) versus pulmonary vein isolation (RFA) Power calculation: Assumed freedom from AF after 24 months in 75% (RFA) versus 60% (AAD) of the patients, α=0.05, 1-β=0.80, N=150 patients in each group Follow-up with 7-day Holter recordings after 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months Intention-to-treat analysis 4

5 Endpoints Primary endpoints: Secondary endpoints:
Cumulative burden of AF AF-burden at each 7-day Holter recording Secondary endpoints: Freedom from any AF after 24 months Freedom from symptomatic AF after 24 months Burden of symptomatic AF after 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months Atrial flutter Quality of Life after 12 and 24 months Serious adverse events 5

6 On AAD: N=13/138 (9%) (IC: 10, III: 3) Withdrawn N=5 Died N=3
294 Patients Randomized 146 Assigned to RFA 140 Underwent RFA (96%) 148 Assigned to AAD 146 Started AAD (99%) 69 underwent repeated RFA 665 7D Holter recordings 666 7D Holter recordings Treatment with 1.24±0.48 AAD’s After 24 months N=140; 223 RFA procedures (1.6±0.7) On AAD: N=13/138 (9%) (IC: 10, III: 3) Withdrawn N=5 Died N=3 After 24 months N=54; 87 RFA procedures (1.6±0.7) On AAD: N=100 /137 (73%) (IC: 86, III:14) Withdrawn N=7 Died N=4 6

7 Baseline Characteristics I RFA AAD
146 148 Age (years) 56±9 54±10 Male gender 100 (68%) 106 (72%) Body Mass Index 27±4 Hypertension 43 (29%) 53 (36%) Coronary artery disease 6 (4%) 2 (1%) Valvular disease 7 (5%) 15 (10%) Previous stroke or TIA 5 (3%) Diabetes 10 (7%) Chronic lung disease 8 (5%) Pacemaker Thyroid disease Previous Cardioversions 103 100 1 8 17 2 11 6 3 7 4 >4 15 7

8 Baseline Characteristics II RFA AAD
Duration of usual AF episodes ≤1 hour 27 29 >1 hour, ≤7 hours 57 >7 hours, ≤24 hours 43 45 >24 hours, ≤2 days 14 8 >2 days, ≤7 days 3 7 Average interval between AF episodes 0-7 days 82 87 >7 days, ≤1 month 48 41 >1 month, ≤6 months 18 >6 months 1 Left atrial size (echo), mm 40±6 40±5 Left ventricular ejection fraction >60% 116 121 40-60% 26 Medication last week before randomization Warfarin 69 (47%) 65 (44%) Betablocker 106 (73%) 107 (72%) Calcium channel blocker 28 (19%) 16 (11%) * Digoxin 17 (12%) 13 (9%) * p<0.05 8

9 AF Burden A: RFA D: AAD 9 Mann-Whitney Test
Mean rank P-value 9

10 AF after 24 Months P=0.004 P=0.012 Number of patients 10

11 Quality of Life (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS)
Mental Component Summary (MCS) ns ns p=0.01 p=0.02 Mean values of PCS and MCS 11

12 Atrial Flutter P=0.25 Number of patients 12

13 Serious Adverse Events
RFA AAD Death 3 4 Stroke 1 Transient ischemic attack Pulmonary vein stenosis Tamponade Pericardial effusion, no puncture Suspected perforation at transseptal puncture Atrial flutter, 1:1 AV conduction 2 Atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia Cardiac incompensation Perimyocarditis Bradycardia with need of pacemaker Ventricular tachycardia and need for ICD Hematoma related to anticoagulation Retroperitoneal bleeding, coiling of small artery Chest discomfort Discomfort probably due to medication Cancer 6 Other (Rotator cuff rupture, Arthroscopy, Gallbladder surgery) Total 25 22 13

14 Conclusions At 24 months AF-burden and occurrence of any and symptomatic AF were significantly lower in the RFA group than in the AAD group. No significant difference was observed in the cumulative burden of AF between AAD and RFA. QOL (PCS) better in the RFA group after 12 and 24 months. These data support RFA as a first-line treatment in patients with paroxysmal AF. 14

15 Discussion Selected patient population.
Not an argument for offering all patients with paroxysmal AF radiofrequency ablation! Both strategies should be discussed with the patients and considered by patients and physicians when rhythm control for symptomatic paroxysmal AF is indicated. The results of the MANTRA-PAF trial support the idea of early ablation for AF to avoid progression of AF on the long term. 15


Download ppt "A Randomized Multicenter Comparison of Radiofrequency Ablation and Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy as First Line Treatment in 294 Patients with Paroxysmal."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google