Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Status of the Glutathione Reactivity Database for Skin Sensitization

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Status of the Glutathione Reactivity Database for Skin Sensitization"— Presentation transcript:

1 Status of the Glutathione Reactivity Database for Skin Sensitization
T. W. Schultz Presented at the McKim Conference September 17, 2008

2 The Toxicity Pathway Framework for Predicting Hazard
Speciation, Metabolism Reactivity Etc. Molecular Initiating Events In Vitro and System Effects In Vivo Adverse Outcomes Parent Chemical Up-Stream Down-Stream CHEMISTRY BIOLOGY Structure-Activity Levels of Organization

3 Hazards of Chemicals with Protein-Binding as Molecular Initiating Event
Human Health Hazards Sensitization - skin and respiratory Acute toxicity - inhalation gas or vapors Chromosomal aberrations Developmental toxicity Selected organ-specific effects Aquatic Toxicity Excess toxicity for aquatic organisms

4 Mechanisms of Protein Binding
No consensus in number > 25 < 50 (40) Vary in target moiety Typically 45% -SH and 45% -NH2 Vary in structural domain Simple: isothiocyanate RN=C=S More complex: Michael addition Most complex: SNAr addition

5 Chemical Reactivity in Skin Sensitization
Mechanisms of Protein Binding In Vitro Measurements In Chemico Measurement Hazard Assessment Endpoints In vitro effects Michael addition SN2 SNAr Reactive Potency In vivo sensitization In silico modeling

6 Relative Reactivity Different nucleophiles can differ in their absolute reactivity towards a given electrophile, but relative reactivity is well correlated over a range of nucleophiles within the same mechanism. CH2=CH k(thiol) K(amine) ______________________________________________________ C(=O)OMe C#N C(=O)NH

7 Tiered Approach to Evaluating Protein Binding
In silico; qualitative, pre-screen 1000’s of compounds In chemico; depletion-based quantitative, screen 100’s of compounds Adduct identification; LC-MS-MS, 10’s of compounds

8 In Chemico Reactivity Use in a similar context to in vitro or in silico Quantitative, rapid, inexpensive experiments with model nucleophiles Verify mechanism-based rules of reactivity Define the applicability domain of a reactive mechanism Provides a measure of relative potency

9 In Chemico Thiol Reactivity Assay
Protocol (Schultz et al., 2005) is quantitative, rapid, inexpensive, abiotic, and spectrophotometric-based Depletion method; measures % free thiol with GSH as the model nucleophile Endpoint is RC50 (50% reactive concentration; mM) is calculated by probit analysis of concentrations-response data after 2-hrs

10 Repeatability & Reproducibility of RC50 Values for Acrolein
RC50 (mM) Date Lot Operator _____________________________________________________________ A A B B A A A A C D D

11 + & - of GSH-Based Reactivity Assay
Readily available Concentration can be analyzed by simple methods Odorless, non-hazardous Water soluble but NOT readily soluble in organic solvents Does not lead itself to HPLC

12 Measurements of In Chemico Reactivity
Depletion of reactant or formation of product Full Kinetics- measured at several time intervals with several initial concentrations of electrophile (100 chemicals) Partial Kinetics- measured at several time intervals with one initial concentrations of electrophile Concentration giving 50% reaction in a fixed time- measured at one time with several initial concentrations of electrophile (1000 chemicals) Extent of reaction after a fixed time- measured at one time with one initial concentrations of electrophile

13 Log (RC50) versus log k

14 Group 1 Thiol –Related Mechanisms
highly relevant with complex domains 1) Michael Addition, 2) Nucleophilic substitution (N-sub) of haloaliphatics, 3) N-sub of haloaromatics (SNAr).

15 Base Structure and Special Features
Michael Acceptors Base Structure and Special Features XC=C XC#C X = -CHO, -COR, -CN, etc.

16 GSH & LLNA DATA EC3 = 0.01 RC50 = 0.03 RC50 = 0.05 RC50 = 0.05

17 Structural Variation for Potency of Esters
TYPE STRUCTURE RC50 (mM) Acetylene dicarboxylates RC(=O)C#CC(=O)R Propiolates C#CC(=O)OR trans-Vinylene dicarboxylates RC(=O)C=CC(=O)R Acrylates C=CC(=O)CR cis-Vinylene dicarboxylates RC(=O)C=CC(=O)R Methacrylates C=C(C)C(=O)CR

18 Base Structure and Special Features
N-sub Haloaliphatic Base Structure and Special Features R1C(X)YR2 Y = C6H5 > C#C > C=C, etc X = I > Br > Cl > F R1 = H > CnH(2n +1) R2 no effect

19 Base Structure and Special Features
N-sub Haloaromatic Base Structure and Special Features XC6H3Y2 Y = NO2, > in-ring-N > CHO > CN X = F > Cl > Br > I Position of leaving group in relationship to activity groups effects potency

20 Qualitative Read-Across for SNAr Electrophiles
Substance RC50 (mM) Sensitizer _______________________________________________ 1-F-2,4-dinitrobenzene 1-Cl-2,4-dinitrobenzene 1-Br-2,4-dinitrobenzene 1,3-Cl-4,6-dinitrobenzene 1,5-Cl-2,3-dinitrobenzene 1,2-dinitrobenzene NRAS 2,4-F-1-nitrobenzene NRAS 2,4-Cl-1-nitrobenzene NRAS 1-Br-4-Cl-2-nitrobenzene NRAS 1,2,3-Cl-5-nitrobenzene NRAS

21 Effect of Derivative on RC50 Values

22 Current Status of Work on Group 1 Thiol –Related Mechanisms
1) Michael Addition (largely completed), 2) Pre-Michael Addition (nearly completed), 3) N-sub of Haloaliphatics (largely completed), 4) N-sub of Haloaromatics (just started).

23 Group 2 Thiol –Related Mechanisms
relevant with simple domains 1) disulfide exchange; 2) disulfide formation, 3) O-heterocyclic ring opening, 4) N-sub of alkyl sulfates & sulfonates, 5) nitroso-binding.

24 Preliminary Work Group 2 Thiol –Related Mechanisms
1) disulfide exchange, (5 compounds) 2) disulfide formation, (5 compounds) 3) O-heterocyclic ring opening, (5 compounds) 4) N-sub of alkyl sulfates, (3 compounds) 5) N-sub of alkyl sulfonates, (3 compounds) 6) nitroso-binding (3 compounds). All demonstrate GSH reactivity and are related to sensitization

25 Group 3 Thiol –Related Mechanisms
less relevant 1) arycarboxylate aminolysis, 2) electrostatic interactions, 3) mercury thiolate formation, 4) oxime group condensation, 5) others.

26 OECD QSAR Toolbox Applies computational methods to filling data gaps
By facilitating the selection of chemical analogues and grouping chemicals into categories Integrates (among other things) mechanisms of action with categories Among the best characterized method, which integrates mechanisms of action into grouping chemicals is the profiler bases on Protein-binding.

27 Toolbox Protein-Binding Profiler
Currently covers 38 different mechanism Vary in specificity Vary in completeness Structural Alerts for mechanisms tend to be qualitative in nature Michael addition alerts include the extreme sensitizer p=benzoquinone, the moderate sensitizer ethyl acrylate, and the very weak sensitizer methyl methacrylate.

28 Subcategorization of Michael Acceptors by Reactivity
Extremely fast: quinones, propiolates , 1-alken-3-ones Fast: acrylates, 2-alkenals, 3-alken-2-ones Moderately Fast: alkyl 2-alkynoates Slow: tiglates Very Slow: methacryates Non-Reactive: non-,-unsaturated

29 Application Reactivity to Catgorizing an Inventory
≈ 1500 substances on the List of Flavor and Fragrance Related Substances ≈1300 discrete substances of which: 79 Fast- to moderate-reacting Michael-acceptors; 19 Slow-reacting Michael-acceptors; 57 Schiff-base aldehydes; 29 Acetals; 15 Disulfide formers; 11 Cyclic addition diones; 9 Disulfide exchangers; 3 O-heterocyclic ring openers. >40 pro-electrophiles

30

31

32 Thank you.


Download ppt "Status of the Glutathione Reactivity Database for Skin Sensitization"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google